From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:34:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fffaabbc-dc86-4516-998b-65777ac97372@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12d36f971e2f3d2141a27a00b9b4fc7f44ea1d17.camel@sipsolutions.net>
> They do seem to remove *both* instances, however, modifying the spatch
> to be
>
> @@
> @@
> static inline int
> ieee80211_get_mbssid_beacon_len(...)
> {
> <+...
> -if (rnr_elems) {...}
> ...+>
> }
>
>
> makes both versions process it pretty much instantaneously. :)
Would you like to reconsider source code transformation approaches
any more also with your SmPL script variations?
See also:
Get the non-optional nest construct completely working for SmPL
2017-08-18
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/114
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 9:31 [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:53 ` Victor Gambier
2025-02-06 10:00 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 12:36 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 9:59 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:07 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 10:12 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:34 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-02-06 10:13 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:46 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 13:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 16:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:26 ` [cocci] Checking SmPL test cases? Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:58 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-08 12:51 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 14:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 15:43 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-09 8:42 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:43 ` [cocci] Checking software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:55 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-07 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-07 9:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-11 9:58 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2025-02-11 10:33 ` [cocci] Comparing software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-12 9:52 ` [cocci] Profiling of SmPL code? Markus Elfring
2026-03-27 10:43 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2026-03-27 10:49 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fffaabbc-dc86-4516-998b-65777ac97372@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.