From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Victor Gambier <victor.gambier@inria.fr>, cocci@inria.fr
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e422c52-814f-4ac8-9a6b-2acd41e28c08@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ed80c12-f83f-4d4f-aac9-166218943535@inria.fr>
>> I stand corrected, I wasn't patient enough. On a machine _much_ faster
>> than my laptop (server CPU), it finished (with warnings about
>> inconsistent modifications) after a bit more than 10 minutes.
>
> Glad to hear! We know there's been a performance regression in 1.2 and we are looking into it. It's a little faster in 1.3.0, but still slower than 1.1.1. It's unclear at the moment to what extent the performance has been degraded because of necessary fixes that perform unavoidable additional work.
Thanks for such background information.
How do you think about to improve measurement approaches
for questionable software run time characteristics?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 9:31 [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:53 ` Victor Gambier
2025-02-06 10:00 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 12:36 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-02-06 9:59 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:07 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 10:12 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:34 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 10:13 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:46 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 13:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 16:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:26 ` [cocci] Checking SmPL test cases? Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:58 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-08 12:51 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 14:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 15:43 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-09 8:42 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:43 ` [cocci] Checking software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:55 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-07 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-07 9:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-11 9:58 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2025-02-11 10:33 ` [cocci] Comparing software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-12 9:52 ` [cocci] Profiling of SmPL code? Markus Elfring
2026-03-27 10:43 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2026-03-27 10:49 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e422c52-814f-4ac8-9a6b-2acd41e28c08@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=victor.gambier@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.