* Should LDM check be less aggressive?
@ 2012-11-21 2:58 Andrey Borzenkov
2012-11-21 21:23 ` Phillip Susi
2013-01-20 21:58 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Borzenkov @ 2012-11-21 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grub-devel
There are multiple reports of GRUB2 refusing to install on disk which
was used for LDM in the past. Example is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1061255
I tested behavior of Windows and Linux on a disk with valid LDM
signature but manually modified partition table. Both ignore LDM labels
if disk does not contain SFS partition (0x42) and treat is as pure MBR
disk. This differs from GRUB2 behavior which always checks for LDM
label whether SFS partition exists or not.
Would the following be appropriate? It adds additional check for
partition 0x42 before checking for LDM labels.
-andrey
Index: grub-2.00/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
===================================================================
--- grub-2.00.orig/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
+++ grub-2.00/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <grub/err.h>
#include <grub/misc.h>
#include <grub/diskfilter.h>
+#include <grub/msdos_partition.h>
#include <grub/gpt_partition.h>
#include <grub/i18n.h>
@@ -103,6 +104,34 @@ read_int (grub_uint8_t *in, grub_size_t
return ret;
}
+static int
+msdos_has_ldm_partition (grub_disk_t dsk)
+{
+ grub_err_t err;
+ int has_sfs = 0;
+ auto int hook (grub_disk_t disk, const grub_partition_t p);
+ int hook (grub_disk_t disk __attribute__ ((unused)), const grub_partition_t p)
+ {
+ if (p->number >= 4)
+ return 1;
+ if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
+ {
+ has_sfs = 1;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ err = grub_partition_msdos_iterate (dsk, hook);
+ if (err)
+ {
+ grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return has_sfs;
+}
+
static const grub_gpt_part_type_t ldm_type = GRUB_GPT_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM;
static grub_disk_addr_t
@@ -756,17 +785,20 @@ grub_ldm_detect (grub_disk_t disk,
{
int i;
+ int has_sfs = msdos_has_ldm_partition (disk);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
grub_disk_addr_t sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
switch (i)
{
case 0:
+ if (!has_sfs)
+ continue;
sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
break;
case 1:
/* LDM is never inside a partition. */
- if (disk->partition)
+ if (!has_sfs || disk->partition)
continue;
sector = grub_disk_get_size (disk);
if (sector == GRUB_DISK_SIZE_UNKNOWN)
@@ -867,6 +899,7 @@ int
grub_util_is_ldm (grub_disk_t disk)
{
int i;
+ int has_sfs = msdos_has_ldm_partition (disk);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
grub_disk_addr_t sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
@@ -876,11 +909,13 @@ grub_util_is_ldm (grub_disk_t disk)
switch (i)
{
case 0:
+ if (!has_sfs)
+ continue;
sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
break;
case 1:
/* LDM is never inside a partition. */
- if (disk->partition)
+ if (!has_sfs || disk->partition)
continue;
sector = grub_disk_get_size (disk);
if (sector == GRUB_DISK_SIZE_UNKNOWN)
Index: grub-2.00/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
===================================================================
--- grub-2.00.orig/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
+++ grub-2.00/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_FAT16_LBA 0xe
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_WIN95_EXTENDED 0xf
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_PLAN9 0x39
+#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS 0x42
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_EZD 0x55
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_MINIX 0x80
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LINUX_MINIX 0x81
Index: grub-2.00/Makefile.util.def
===================================================================
--- grub-2.00.orig/Makefile.util.def
+++ grub-2.00/Makefile.util.def
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ library = {
common = grub-core/disk/ldm.c;
common = grub-core/disk/diskfilter.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/gpt.c;
+ common = grub-core/partmap/msdos.c;
};
library = {
@@ -109,7 +110,6 @@ library = {
common = grub-core/partmap/acorn.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/amiga.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/apple.c;
- common = grub-core/partmap/msdos.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/sun.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/plan.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/dvh.c;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
2012-11-21 2:58 Should LDM check be less aggressive? Andrey Borzenkov
@ 2012-11-21 21:23 ` Phillip Susi
2013-01-20 21:58 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Susi @ 2012-11-21 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The development of GNU GRUB; +Cc: Andrey Borzenkov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2012 9:58 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> There are multiple reports of GRUB2 refusing to install on disk
> which was used for LDM in the past. Example is:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1061255
>
> I tested behavior of Windows and Linux on a disk with valid LDM
> signature but manually modified partition table. Both ignore LDM
> labels if disk does not contain SFS partition (0x42) and treat is
> as pure MBR disk. This differs from GRUB2 behavior which always
> checks for LDM label whether SFS partition exists or not.
>
> Would the following be appropriate? It adds additional check for
> partition 0x42 before checking for LDM labels.
Looks nice to me. The kernel has this requirement so grub should as well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQrUZhAAoJEJrBOlT6nu759uEH/RuU97hAKP2GcAHTkKjvcZqg
Jih1USVExNW/CYzXglXXg8KjYOv7J5xQsj00KZ8LW8f0X+ns76kV1NsrraeJFETI
repkr9FX55+qvUYzbl7PiykoWnC3RUp+TUzZYotZcfc0j1YraDzhAtNsZmDPfvwq
n9Ljo0py/HBPrWU6rjE31voVA8tkYOUz6ztldghDT3x+OJI7w5KnXJgXEOYxqVoJ
Sx9dHsCd/AKO68CwCjVuRHUeQQV1EIlVDKX0ZG21ZM2q79YEJnIChXVSvxbaySRD
yB6W9BNg7hOtFPkJs9pr81qWu3YE9RwyreOLfgGR4qzPpMBQkGsdEMJqlQytq4k=
=2Eyx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
2012-11-21 2:58 Should LDM check be less aggressive? Andrey Borzenkov
2012-11-21 21:23 ` Phillip Susi
@ 2013-01-20 21:58 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2013-01-21 18:50 ` Andrey Borzenkov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko @ 2013-01-20 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The development of GNU GRUB
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]
On 21.11.2012 03:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> + if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
SFS is confusing as the partition in question isn't SFS, it just happens
that LDM and SFS ids collide.
Also another problem is that of booting in case of corrupted msdos table
if LDM is intact but given that the kernels won't be able to recognize
such a case anyway it's a minor one. Could you update the patch not to
mention SFS?
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 294 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
2013-01-20 21:58 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
@ 2013-01-21 18:50 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2013-05-28 14:34 ` Phillip Susi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Borzenkov @ 2013-01-21 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grub-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5404 bytes --]
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:58:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> пишет:
> On 21.11.2012 03:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > + if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
>
> SFS is confusing as the partition in question isn't SFS, it just happens
> that LDM and SFS ids collide.
> Also another problem is that of booting in case of corrupted msdos table
> if LDM is intact but given that the kernels won't be able to recognize
> such a case anyway it's a minor one. Could you update the patch not to
> mention SFS?
>
Done. Also updated for new hook API.
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] check for LDM partition before checking LDM label
There are several reports of leftover LDM label at the end of disk
blocking installation of grub. Check for existence of LDM partition
before checking for LDM label validity. This is the same check as
done by Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
Makefile.util.def | 2 +-
grub-core/disk/ldm.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/grub/msdos_partition.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 32b891a..dccdcc1 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2013-01-21 Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
+
+ * Makefile.util.def: add partmap/msdos.c to common library
+ * include/grub/msdos_partition.h: add GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM
+ * grub-core/disk/ldm.c: check for existence of
+ GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM
+
2013-01-21 Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Make color variables global instead of it being per-terminal.
diff --git a/Makefile.util.def b/Makefile.util.def
index 3ee5e4e..1ccf390 100644
--- a/Makefile.util.def
+++ b/Makefile.util.def
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ library = {
common = grub-core/disk/ldm.c;
common = grub-core/disk/diskfilter.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/gpt.c;
+ common = grub-core/partmap/msdos.c;
};
library = {
@@ -110,7 +111,6 @@ library = {
common = grub-core/partmap/acorn.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/amiga.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/apple.c;
- common = grub-core/partmap/msdos.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/sun.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/plan.c;
common = grub-core/partmap/dvh.c;
diff --git a/grub-core/disk/ldm.c b/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
index b92433d..a2e26b2 100644
--- a/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
+++ b/grub-core/disk/ldm.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <grub/err.h>
#include <grub/misc.h>
#include <grub/diskfilter.h>
+#include <grub/msdos_partition.h>
#include <grub/gpt_partition.h>
#include <grub/i18n.h>
@@ -103,6 +104,37 @@ read_int (grub_uint8_t *in, grub_size_t s)
return ret;
}
+static int
+check_ldm_partition (grub_disk_t disk __attribute__ ((unused)), const grub_partition_t p, void *data)
+{
+ int *has_ldm = data;
+
+ if (p->number >= 4)
+ return 1;
+ if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM)
+ {
+ *has_ldm = 1;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+msdos_has_ldm_partition (grub_disk_t dsk)
+{
+ grub_err_t err;
+ int has_ldm = 0;
+
+ err = grub_partition_msdos_iterate (dsk, check_ldm_partition, &has_ldm);
+ if (err)
+ {
+ grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return has_ldm;
+}
+
static const grub_gpt_part_type_t ldm_type = GRUB_GPT_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM;
/* Helper for gpt_ldm_sector. */
@@ -760,17 +792,20 @@ grub_ldm_detect (grub_disk_t disk,
{
int i;
+ int has_ldm = msdos_has_ldm_partition (disk);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
grub_disk_addr_t sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
switch (i)
{
case 0:
+ if (!has_ldm)
+ continue;
sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
break;
case 1:
/* LDM is never inside a partition. */
- if (disk->partition)
+ if (!has_ldm || disk->partition)
continue;
sector = grub_disk_get_size (disk);
if (sector == GRUB_DISK_SIZE_UNKNOWN)
@@ -871,6 +906,7 @@ int
grub_util_is_ldm (grub_disk_t disk)
{
int i;
+ int has_ldm = msdos_has_ldm_partition (disk);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
grub_disk_addr_t sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
@@ -880,11 +916,13 @@ grub_util_is_ldm (grub_disk_t disk)
switch (i)
{
case 0:
+ if (!has_ldm)
+ continue;
sector = LDM_LABEL_SECTOR;
break;
case 1:
/* LDM is never inside a partition. */
- if (disk->partition)
+ if (!has_ldm || disk->partition)
continue;
sector = grub_disk_get_size (disk);
if (sector == GRUB_DISK_SIZE_UNKNOWN)
diff --git a/include/grub/msdos_partition.h b/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
index 1e9b65e..92f8539 100644
--- a/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
+++ b/include/grub/msdos_partition.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_FAT16_LBA 0xe
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_WIN95_EXTENDED 0xf
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_PLAN9 0x39
+#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM 0x42
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_EZD 0x55
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_MINIX 0x80
#define GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LINUX_MINIX 0x81
--
tg: (812be57..) fu/tighten-LDM-check (depends on: master)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
2013-01-21 18:50 ` Andrey Borzenkov
@ 2013-05-28 14:34 ` Phillip Susi
2013-05-28 15:05 ` Andrey Borzenkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Susi @ 2013-05-28 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The development of GNU GRUB
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Did this ever get applied?
On 1/21/2013 1:50 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:58:26 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
> Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> пишет:
>
>> On 21.11.2012 03:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>>> + if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
>>
>> SFS is confusing as the partition in question isn't SFS, it just
>> happens that LDM and SFS ids collide. Also another problem is
>> that of booting in case of corrupted msdos table if LDM is intact
>> but given that the kernels won't be able to recognize such a case
>> anyway it's a minor one. Could you update the patch not to
>> mention SFS?
>>
>
> Done. Also updated for new hook API.
>
>
> From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] check
> for LDM partition before checking LDM label
>
> There are several reports of leftover LDM label at the end of disk
> blocking installation of grub. Check for existence of LDM
> partition before checking for LDM label validity. This is the same
> check as done by Linux kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
>
> --- ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ Makefile.util.def
> | 2 +- grub-core/disk/ldm.c | 42
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/grub/msdos_partition.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 49
> insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 32b891a..dccdcc1 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2013-01-21
> Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> + + * Makefile.util.def: add
> partmap/msdos.c to common library + *
> include/grub/msdos_partition.h: add GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM + *
> grub-core/disk/ldm.c: check for existence of +
> GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRpMB/AAoJEJrBOlT6nu75QfQH+gI7iPowpcB9UbPWHT2aOWkb
3mjdKlBkZVJbZOm2jn1kMBiNutxcVlNiuE4XT2oiaCWhWI2q6yqBbkXXHUqE+uif
huSPxm/czh8mVz7FNSxmos8pJjsXFQ7tX1jI6ByoDqLjwTvnXXYfxgY6L5t/Bo1P
+tFrdUBC0rAwFq99tKXkQQ802YbJ+eiLMehn0CQu2GggVsvnXGZkWb4trYr99ySw
/eFQjW8mCVarbV1YH3MpLG/Jdevs0war0VmB5BrsxQ1pARiMI5aLhDENGGTJwc6X
ucSJYplHdBRjSCr4ukdQNOzr3s/5wPwK9ZDaeOYkVDClnDK54fM8QBya+y6ZKAg=
=rKy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
2013-05-28 14:34 ` Phillip Susi
@ 2013-05-28 15:05 ` Andrey Borzenkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Borzenkov @ 2013-05-28 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phillip Susi
Cc: The development of GNU GRUB,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
В Tue, 28 May 2013 10:34:39 -0400
Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com> пишет:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Did this ever get applied?
>
Yes
> On 1/21/2013 1:50 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:58:26 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
> > Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> пишет:
> >
> >> On 21.11.2012 03:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> >>
> >>> + if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
> >>
> >> SFS is confusing as the partition in question isn't SFS, it just
> >> happens that LDM and SFS ids collide. Also another problem is
> >> that of booting in case of corrupted msdos table if LDM is intact
> >> but given that the kernels won't be able to recognize such a case
> >> anyway it's a minor one. Could you update the patch not to
> >> mention SFS?
> >>
> >
> > Done. Also updated for new hook API.
> >
> >
> > From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] check
> > for LDM partition before checking LDM label
> >
> > There are several reports of leftover LDM label at the end of disk
> > blocking installation of grub. Check for existence of LDM
> > partition before checking for LDM label validity. This is the same
> > check as done by Linux kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
> >
> > --- ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ Makefile.util.def
> > | 2 +- grub-core/disk/ldm.c | 42
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > include/grub/msdos_partition.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 49
> > insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 32b891a..dccdcc1 100644
> > --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2013-01-21
> > Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> + + * Makefile.util.def: add
> > partmap/msdos.c to common library + *
> > include/grub/msdos_partition.h: add GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM + *
> > grub-core/disk/ldm.c: check for existence of +
> > GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_LDM
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRpMB/AAoJEJrBOlT6nu75QfQH+gI7iPowpcB9UbPWHT2aOWkb
> 3mjdKlBkZVJbZOm2jn1kMBiNutxcVlNiuE4XT2oiaCWhWI2q6yqBbkXXHUqE+uif
> huSPxm/czh8mVz7FNSxmos8pJjsXFQ7tX1jI6ByoDqLjwTvnXXYfxgY6L5t/Bo1P
> +tFrdUBC0rAwFq99tKXkQQ802YbJ+eiLMehn0CQu2GggVsvnXGZkWb4trYr99ySw
> /eFQjW8mCVarbV1YH3MpLG/Jdevs0war0VmB5BrsxQ1pARiMI5aLhDENGGTJwc6X
> ucSJYplHdBRjSCr4ukdQNOzr3s/5wPwK9ZDaeOYkVDClnDK54fM8QBya+y6ZKAg=
> =rKy2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlGkx6cACgkQR6LMutpd94yrxQCgwlcSMgwqlno8mywJ3fjX0RvU
AcUAn2redHsk3y/qly1UzlXv8mRQuZRi
=nlEF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-28 15:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-21 2:58 Should LDM check be less aggressive? Andrey Borzenkov
2012-11-21 21:23 ` Phillip Susi
2013-01-20 21:58 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2013-01-21 18:50 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2013-05-28 14:34 ` Phillip Susi
2013-05-28 15:05 ` Andrey Borzenkov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.