Re: [PATCH 2/8] um: Do not use SUBARCH

[Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>]

Am 26.09.2013 18:06, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> And, of course, this makes your patch valid.
>> Can you also please ensure that your new defconfigs are minimal?
> 
> Yeah, it's close to a minimal configuration for the 3.10 kernel
> (latest at the time of patch submission). I was aiming to minimize the
> diff between the current defconfig and the two new defconfigs in
> configs/. The slim diffstat does the talking:
> 
>  arch/um/Kconfig.common                          |   5 -
>  arch/um/Makefile                                |  11 ++
>  arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig}   | 209 +++++++++++++-------
>  arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} | 250 +++++++++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/um/Kconfig                             |   5 +
>  5 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
>  copy arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} (86%)
>  rename arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} (83%)
> 
> If we find some deficiencies, we can always update it. For now, please
> commit these two patches.

Please resend them with savedefconfig applied.
There is no need to have three commits for that.

Thanks,
//richard