* Testing the next giant release
@ 2015-01-07 14:02 Loic Dachary
[not found] ` <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com>
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamil Muthamizhan; +Cc: Ceph Development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]
Hi Tamil,
I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289
into
http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2
and successfully ran make check on it
http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports
If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: Testing the next giant release [not found] ` <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-01-07 22:28 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-07 22:34 ` Yuri Weinstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tamil Muthamizhan; +Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1775 bytes --] On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: > hi Loic, > > we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. > maybe you can try that to make sure things work. Are these the suites I should try: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) Cheers > > once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. > > Thanks, > Tamil > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: > > Hi Tamil, > > I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 > > into > > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 > > and successfully ran make check on it > > http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports > > If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > > > -- > Regards, > Tamil -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 22:28 ` Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 22:34 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-07 22:53 ` Tamil Muthamizhan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-07 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Tamil Muthamizhan, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Loic, I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. Thx YuriW On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > > > On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >> hi Loic, >> >> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. > > Are these the suites I should try: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw > > any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) > > Cheers > >> >> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. >> >> Thanks, >> Tamil >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Tamil, >> >> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >> >> into >> >> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >> >> and successfully ran make check on it >> >> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >> >> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Tamil > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 22:34 ` Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-07 22:53 ` Tamil Muthamizhan 2015-01-07 23:03 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Tamil Muthamizhan @ 2015-01-07 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Loic Dachary, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org yes, just those suites will do Loic. On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yuri.weinstein@inktank.com> wrote: > Loic, > > I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on > whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. > > Thx > YuriW > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> >> >> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>> hi Loic, >>> >>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >> >> Are these the suites I should try: >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >> >> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) >> >> Cheers >> >>> >>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tamil >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tamil, >>> >>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>> >>> into >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>> >>> and successfully ran make check on it >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>> >>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Tamil >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- Regards, Tamil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 22:53 ` Tamil Muthamizhan @ 2015-01-07 23:03 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-07 23:29 ` Yuri Weinstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tamil Muthamizhan, Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2690 bytes --] Thanks Yuri & Tamil ! One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=giant does not show a run of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of errors I should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ? On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: > yes, just those suites will do Loic. > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein > <yuri.weinstein@inktank.com> wrote: >> Loic, >> >> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on >> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. >> >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>>> hi Loic, >>>> >>>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >>> >>> Are these the suites I should try: >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >>> >>> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> >>>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tamil >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tamil, >>>> >>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>>> >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>>> >>>> into >>>> >>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>>> >>>> and successfully ran make check on it >>>> >>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>>> >>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Tamil >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 23:03 ` Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 23:29 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-07 23:40 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-07 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Tamil Muthamizhan, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/ On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > > Thanks Yuri & Tamil ! > > One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=giant does not show a run of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of errors I should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ? > > > On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >> yes, just those suites will do Loic. >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein >> <yuri.weinstein@inktank.com> wrote: >>> Loic, >>> >>> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on >>> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. >>> >>> Thx >>> YuriW >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>>>> hi Loic, >>>>> >>>>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>>>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >>>> >>>> Are these the suites I should try: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >>>> >>>> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>>> >>>>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tamil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Tamil, >>>>> >>>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>>>> >>>>> into >>>>> >>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>>>> >>>>> and successfully ran make check on it >>>>> >>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>>>> >>>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Tamil >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >> >> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 23:29 ` Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-07 23:40 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-08 15:50 ` new testing lab (was: Re: Testing the next giant release) Ken Dreyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-07 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3369 bytes --] Great, thanks, I did not know about this one :-) On 08/01/2015 00:29, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/ > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks Yuri & Tamil ! >> >> One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=giant does not show a run of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of errors I should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ? >> >> >> On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>> yes, just those suites will do Loic. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein >>> <yuri.weinstein@inktank.com> wrote: >>>> Loic, >>>> >>>> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on >>>> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. >>>> >>>> Thx >>>> YuriW >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>>>>> hi Loic, >>>>>> >>>>>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>>>>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >>>>> >>>>> Are these the suites I should try: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >>>>> >>>>> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e. all os versions etc.) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teuthology for a more elaborate run. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Tamil >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org <mailto:loic@dachary.org>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tamil, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>>>>> >>>>>> into >>>>>> >>>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>>>>> >>>>>> and successfully ran make check on it >>>>>> >>>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>>>>> >>>>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Tamil >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* new testing lab (was: Re: Testing the next giant release) 2015-01-07 23:40 ` Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-08 15:50 ` Ken Dreyer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ken Dreyer @ 2015-01-08 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary, Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 01/07/2015 04:40 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Great, thanks, I did not know about this one :-) > > On 08/01/2015 00:29, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >> Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/ Not everyone in the community is going to know about the Octo lab, and that URL is unavailable outside of Red Hat's network. I want to be sure we're explaining this for everyone's benefit here. In contrast to our "Sepia" lab in Irvine, the "Octo lab" is a new set of hardware in Raleigh that we've been using in order to run some other Teuthology tests. As part of the Inktank acquisition by Red Hat, we've begun migrating some Teuthology tests onto this new hardware. It's simply a matter of the current hardware's old age and the desire to move to "something else" before we find ourselves at point where QA is completely blocked on broken boxes or we're losing data. A side-effect of this change is that some of our Teuthology test runs are currently unavailable to the public. (If you've run across Ceph Redmine tickets recently that mention hostnames like "*.ceph.redhat.com" you'll know what I'm talking about.) Obviously we want to make our tests as public as possible just as we strove to do with the older public "sepia" lab in Irvine. Sandon Van Ness has been working hard to bring up a second Raleigh lab that will feature new Seamicro hardware and be as open to the community as sepia is. Things are still in flux regarding the exact hostnames, but the current plan is to refer to this lab as "typica" to distinguish the Raleigh machines from the "sepia" machines in Irvine. If you're interested in our test labs or other public Ceph infrastructure, we have a public IRC channel, and it's #sepia on OFTC. You're welcome to hang out and watch us discuss teuthology failures :) - Ken ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 14:02 Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary [not found] ` <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-01-08 9:39 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-08 16:10 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-09 11:06 ` Loic Dachary 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-08 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tamil Muthamizhan; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1459 bytes --] Hi, The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports etc. and I scheduled a rbd suite with ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dachary.org --owner loic@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports which shows at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ To be continued ! On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Tamil, > > I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 > > into > > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 > > and successfully ran make check on it > > http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports > > If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-08 9:39 ` Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-08 16:10 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-12 14:23 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-08 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tamil Muthamizhan; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2690 bytes --] Hi Tamil, The test completed with a number of failures. I compared them with the latest giant / rbd run (which is on the red hat private lab). The number of failure is comparable (40 failed out of 102 january 6th 2015). However the failures are mostly different and I'm not sure what to do next. http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-01-06_02:00:01-rbd-giant-distro-basic-magna/ shows Command failed on magna094 with status 1: 'sudo yum install ceph-radosgw-0.87 -y' (a number of times) Command failed on magna065 with status 1: 'adjust-ulimits ceph-coverage /home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/coverage daemon-helper term qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -nographic -m 4096 -drive file=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/base.client.0.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio -cdrom /home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/client.0.iso -fsdev local,id=log,path=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/qemu/client.0,security_model=none -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=log,mount_tag=test_log -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.0:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.1:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough' (a few times). On 08/01/2015 10:39, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi, > > The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight > > http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports > etc. > > and I scheduled a rbd suite with > > ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dachary.org --owner loic@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports > > which shows at > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ > > To be continued ! > > On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Tamil, >> >> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >> >> into >> >> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >> >> and successfully ran make check on it >> >> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >> >> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >> >> Cheers >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-08 16:10 ` Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-12 14:23 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-12 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3248 bytes --] Hi Yuri, I analyzed the errors from the rbd run at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ and summarized my findings in the description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 It would be great if you could let me know if these look familiar. They all seem to relate to something that's not from the backports, except for http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 because it looks new. Cheers On 08/01/2015 17:10, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Tamil, > > The test completed with a number of failures. I compared them with the latest giant / rbd run (which is on the red hat private lab). The number of failure is comparable (40 failed out of 102 january 6th 2015). However the failures are mostly different and I'm not sure what to do next. > > http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-01-06_02:00:01-rbd-giant-distro-basic-magna/ shows > > Command failed on magna094 with status 1: 'sudo yum install ceph-radosgw-0.87 -y' > > (a number of times) > > Command failed on magna065 with status 1: 'adjust-ulimits ceph-coverage /home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/coverage daemon-helper term qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -nographic -m 4096 -drive file=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/base.client.0.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio -cdrom /home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/client.0.iso -fsdev local,id=log,path=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/qemu/client.0,security_model=none -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=log,mount_tag=test_log -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.0:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.1:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough' > > (a few times). > > On 08/01/2015 10:39, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight >> >> http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports >> etc. >> >> and I scheduled a rbd suite with >> >> ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dachary.org --owner loic@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports >> >> which shows at >> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ >> >> To be continued ! >> >> On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Tamil, >>> >>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>> >>> into >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>> >>> and successfully ran make check on it >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>> >>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing the next giant release 2015-01-07 14:02 Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary [not found] ` <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com> 2015-01-08 9:39 ` Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-09 11:06 ` Loic Dachary 2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-09 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tamil Muthamizhan; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1301 bytes --] Hi, The rgw suite was scheduled (same as rbd only changed to rgw): ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rgw --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dachary.org --owner loic@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports it is at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-09_11:38:03-rgw-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ Cheers On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Tamil, > > I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 > > into > > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 > > and successfully ran make check on it > > http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports > > If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ? > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-12 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-07 14:02 Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary
[not found] ` <CAFd2DpShjeBXQ5YPfWLVq2zsSTZDBzyZuvo40kOhzVy2fTdmCA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-07 22:28 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-07 22:34 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-01-07 22:53 ` Tamil Muthamizhan
2015-01-07 23:03 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-07 23:29 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-01-07 23:40 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-08 15:50 ` new testing lab (was: Re: Testing the next giant release) Ken Dreyer
2015-01-08 9:39 ` Testing the next giant release Loic Dachary
2015-01-08 16:10 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-12 14:23 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-09 11:06 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.