From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, wei@redhat.com,
cov@codeaurora.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org,
peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56670865.2050705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-13-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMCNTENSET or PMCNTENCLR register.
>
> When writing to PMCNTENSET, call perf_event_enable to enable the perf
> event. When writing to PMCNTENCLR, call perf_event_disable to disable
> the perf event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 ++++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 2304937..a780cb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,21 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case PMCNTENSET_EL0: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> +
> + /* accessing PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case PMCR_EL0: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -817,10 +832,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b010),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -1137,6 +1152,20 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case c9_PMCNTENSET: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENSET */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENCLR */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case c9_PMCR: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1220,8 +1249,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> /* PMU */
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMCR },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 36bde48..e731656 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 15babf1..45586d2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,53 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> }
>
> /**
> + * kvm_pmu_enable_counter - enable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENSET register
> + * @all_enable: the value of PMCR.E
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_enable to start counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + if (!all_enable)
> + return;
You have the vcpu. Can you move the check for PMCR_EL0.E here instead of
having it in both of the callers?
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
Nonononono... If you must have to use a long, use a long. Don't cast it
to a different type (hint: big endian).
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event) {
> + perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> + if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_disable_counter - disable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENCLR register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_disable to stop counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
Why are enable and disable asymmetric (handling of PMCR.E)?
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event)
> + perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56670865.2050705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-13-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMCNTENSET or PMCNTENCLR register.
>
> When writing to PMCNTENSET, call perf_event_enable to enable the perf
> event. When writing to PMCNTENCLR, call perf_event_disable to disable
> the perf event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 ++++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 2304937..a780cb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,21 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case PMCNTENSET_EL0: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> +
> + /* accessing PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case PMCR_EL0: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -817,10 +832,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b010),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -1137,6 +1152,20 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case c9_PMCNTENSET: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENSET */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENCLR */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case c9_PMCR: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1220,8 +1249,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> /* PMU */
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMCR },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 36bde48..e731656 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 15babf1..45586d2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,53 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> }
>
> /**
> + * kvm_pmu_enable_counter - enable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENSET register
> + * @all_enable: the value of PMCR.E
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_enable to start counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + if (!all_enable)
> + return;
You have the vcpu. Can you move the check for PMCR_EL0.E here instead of
having it in both of the callers?
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
Nonononono... If you must have to use a long, use a long. Don't cast it
to a different type (hint: big endian).
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event) {
> + perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> + if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_disable_counter - disable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENCLR register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_disable to stop counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
Why are enable and disable asymmetric (handling of PMCR.E)?
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event)
> + perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 12:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVTYPERn and PMCCFILTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVCNTRn and PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56670865.2050705@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hangaohuai@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.