From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:43:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <566716CE.5080405@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-22-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM PMU. Implement
> the kvm_device_ops for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt | 16 +++++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 +
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++
> 6 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5121f1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +ARM Virtual Performance Monitor Unit (vPMU)
> +===========================================
> +
> +Device types supported:
> + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 ARM Performance Monitor Unit v3
> +
> +Instantiate one PMU instance for per VCPU through this API.
> +
> +Groups:
> + KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ
> + Attributes:
> + A value describing the interrupt number of PMU overflow interrupt. This
> + interrupt should be a PPI.
> +
> + Errors:
> + -EINVAL: Value set is out of the expected range (from 16 to 31)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 2d4ca4b..568afa2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL 4
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT 0
>
> +/* Device Control API: ARM PMU */
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ 0
> +
> /* KVM_IRQ_LINE irq field index values */
> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT 24
> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK 0xff
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index c923350..608dea6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_mpic_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_xics_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops;
> +extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_pmu_ops;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 03f3618..4ba6fdd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,8 @@ enum kvm_device_type {
> #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC
> KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3,
> #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3 KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3
> + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3,
> +#define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3
> KVM_DEV_TYPE_MAX,
> };
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index f8007c7..a84a4d7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -19,10 +19,13 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>
> +#include "vgic.h"
> +
> /**
> * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> @@ -438,3 +441,93 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
>
> pmc->perf_event = event;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_pmu_initialized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != -1;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
> +{
> + int j;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(j, vcpu, kvm) {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +
> + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_initialized(vcpu))
> + kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", irq);
> + pmu->irq_num = irq;
Missing braces? Also, you should consider returning an error if it has
been initialized twice.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm *kvm = dev->kvm;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +
> + memset(pmu, 0, sizeof(*pmu));
> + kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> + pmu->irq_num = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_arm_pmu_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
> +{
> + kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> + switch (attr->group) {
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ: {
> + int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + int reg;
> +
> + if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (reg < VGIC_NR_SGIS || reg >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(dev->kvm, reg);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
Shouldn't you be able to retrieve the configured interrupt?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> + switch (attr->group) {
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_pmu_ops = {
> + .name = "kvm-arm-pmu",
> + .create = kvm_arm_pmu_create,
> + .destroy = kvm_arm_pmu_destroy,
> + .set_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_set_attr,
> + .get_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_get_attr,
> + .has_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_has_attr,
> +};
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 484079e..81a42cc 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2647,6 +2647,10 @@ static struct kvm_device_ops *kvm_device_ops_table[KVM_DEV_TYPE_MAX] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XICS
> [KVM_DEV_TYPE_XICS] = &kvm_xics_ops,
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> + [KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3] = &kvm_arm_pmu_ops,
> +#endif
> };
>
> int kvm_register_device_ops(struct kvm_device_ops *ops, u32 type)
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:43:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <566716CE.5080405@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-22-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM PMU. Implement
> the kvm_device_ops for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt | 16 +++++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 +
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++
> 6 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5121f1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +ARM Virtual Performance Monitor Unit (vPMU)
> +===========================================
> +
> +Device types supported:
> + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 ARM Performance Monitor Unit v3
> +
> +Instantiate one PMU instance for per VCPU through this API.
> +
> +Groups:
> + KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ
> + Attributes:
> + A value describing the interrupt number of PMU overflow interrupt. This
> + interrupt should be a PPI.
> +
> + Errors:
> + -EINVAL: Value set is out of the expected range (from 16 to 31)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 2d4ca4b..568afa2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL 4
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT 0
>
> +/* Device Control API: ARM PMU */
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ 0
> +
> /* KVM_IRQ_LINE irq field index values */
> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT 24
> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK 0xff
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index c923350..608dea6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_mpic_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_xics_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops;
> extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops;
> +extern struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_pmu_ops;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 03f3618..4ba6fdd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,8 @@ enum kvm_device_type {
> #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC
> KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3,
> #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3 KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3
> + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3,
> +#define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3
> KVM_DEV_TYPE_MAX,
> };
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index f8007c7..a84a4d7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -19,10 +19,13 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>
> +#include "vgic.h"
> +
> /**
> * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> @@ -438,3 +441,93 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
>
> pmc->perf_event = event;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_pmu_initialized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != -1;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
> +{
> + int j;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(j, vcpu, kvm) {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +
> + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_initialized(vcpu))
> + kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", irq);
> + pmu->irq_num = irq;
Missing braces? Also, you should consider returning an error if it has
been initialized twice.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm *kvm = dev->kvm;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +
> + memset(pmu, 0, sizeof(*pmu));
> + kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> + pmu->irq_num = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_arm_pmu_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
> +{
> + kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> + switch (attr->group) {
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ: {
> + int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + int reg;
> +
> + if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (reg < VGIC_NR_SGIS || reg >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(dev->kvm, reg);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
Shouldn't you be able to retrieve the configured interrupt?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> + switch (attr->group) {
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_PMU_GRP_IRQ:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_pmu_ops = {
> + .name = "kvm-arm-pmu",
> + .create = kvm_arm_pmu_create,
> + .destroy = kvm_arm_pmu_destroy,
> + .set_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_set_attr,
> + .get_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_get_attr,
> + .has_attr = kvm_arm_pmu_has_attr,
> +};
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 484079e..81a42cc 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2647,6 +2647,10 @@ static struct kvm_device_ops *kvm_device_ops_table[KVM_DEV_TYPE_MAX] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XICS
> [KVM_DEV_TYPE_XICS] = &kvm_xics_ops,
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> + [KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3] = &kvm_arm_pmu_ops,
> +#endif
> };
>
> int kvm_register_device_ops(struct kvm_device_ops *ops, u32 type)
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 12:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVTYPERn and PMCCFILTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVCNTRn and PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=566716CE.5080405@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.