From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:28:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arFpUtyq7sphiJzw@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-6-oupton@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 11:41:44AM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Pass sufficient context to the stage-2 PTW such that access-dependent
> features like FEAT_HAFDBS can determine the correct behavior of the
> walk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/at.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 10 +++++-----
> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 7fe6fb56c187..71814c4aac3e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -105,7 +105,20 @@ static inline bool kvm_has_xnx(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, XNX, IMP);
> }
>
> -extern int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t gipa,
> +struct kvm_walk_access {
> + enum {
> + WALK_ACCESS_IFETCH,
> + WALK_ACCESS_LDST,
> + WALK_ACCESS_CMO,
> + WALK_ACCESS_AT,
> + WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
> + } type;
> +
> + u64 ia;
> + bool write;
> +};
> +
> +extern int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *access,
> struct kvm_s2_trans *result);
> extern int kvm_s2_handle_perm_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_s2_trans *trans);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> index 7a84495a2e6d..083014e9d86a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -483,7 +483,19 @@ static int walk_s1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
> ipa = baddr | index;
>
> if (wi->s2) {
> - ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, ipa, &s2_trans);
> + struct kvm_walk_access s2_access = {
> + .type = WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
> + .ia = ipa,
> +
> + /*
> + * R_JCXVS, stage-2 dirty state can be updated
> + * for an S1PTW even if the stage-1 descriptor
> + * isn't updated.
> + */
> + .write = wi->ha,
> + };
> +
> + ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, &s2_access, &s2_trans);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1597,8 +1609,9 @@ int __kvm_at_s1e2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr)
>
> int __kvm_at_s12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr)
> {
> + struct kvm_walk_access access = {};
> struct kvm_s2_trans out = {};
> - u64 ipa, par;
> + u64 par;
> bool write;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1642,9 +1655,11 @@ int __kvm_at_s12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr)
> return 0;
>
> /* Do the stage-2 translation */
> - ipa = (par & GENMASK_ULL(47, 12)) | (vaddr & GENMASK_ULL(11, 0));
> + access.type = WALK_ACCESS_AT;
> + access.ia = (par & GENMASK_ULL(47, 12)) | (vaddr & GENMASK_ULL(11, 0));
What does this mask represent?
Looking into PAR_EL1 in sysreg.h I can find:
SYS_PAR_EL1_PA which is GENMASK_ULL(51, 12), and looks to match what you
ia means here.
Are you using the mask manually because you want to make sure and
filter-out bits 48-51? Is there a reason?
> out.esr = 0;
> - ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, ipa, &out);
> +
> + ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, &access, &out);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index f35c4ce95473..88998195274b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2313,9 +2313,23 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> if (kvm_is_nested_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm,vcpu->arch.hw_mmu) &&
> vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->nested_stage2_enabled) {
> + struct kvm_walk_access access = {
> + .ia = fault_ipa,
> + };
> u32 esr;
>
> - ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, fault_ipa, &nested_trans);
> + if (kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu))
> + access.type = WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW;
> + else if (is_iabt)
> + access.type = WALK_ACCESS_IFETCH;
> + else if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(vcpu))
> + access.type = WALK_ACCESS_CMO;
> + else
> + access.type = WALK_ACCESS_LDST;
> +
> + access.write = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
> +
> + ret = kvm_walk_nested_s2(vcpu, &access, &nested_trans);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> ret = 1;
> goto out_unlock;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index dcc7d0cc7c95..c2fb7290f0c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void compute_s2_permissions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *w
> *
> * Must be called with the kvm->srcu read lock held
> */
> -static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t ipa,
> +static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *access,
> struct s2_walk_info *wi, struct kvm_s2_trans *out)
> {
> int first_block_level, stride, input_size, base_lower_bound;
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t ipa,
> phys_addr_t index;
>
> addr_bottom = (3 - ws.level) * stride + wi->pgshift;
> - index = (ipa & GENMASK_ULL(addr_top, addr_bottom))
> + index = (access->ia & GENMASK_ULL(addr_top, addr_bottom))
> >> (addr_bottom - 3);
>
> ws.desc_pa = base_addr | index;
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int walk_nested_s2_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t ipa,
>
> /* Calculate and return the result */
> out->output = (ws.desc & GENMASK_ULL(47, addr_bottom)) |
> - (ipa & GENMASK_ULL(addr_bottom - 1, 0));
> + (access->ia & GENMASK_ULL(addr_bottom - 1, 0));
> out->block_size = 1UL << ((3 - ws.level) * stride + wi->pgshift);
> compute_s2_permissions(vcpu, wi, &ws, out);
> out->level = ws.level;
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static void setup_s2_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi)
> wi->be = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL2) & SCTLR_ELx_EE;
> }
>
> -int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t gipa,
> +int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_walk_access *access,
> struct kvm_s2_trans *result)
> {
> struct s2_walk_info wi;
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ int kvm_walk_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t gipa,
>
> setup_s2_walk(vcpu, &wi);
>
> - ret = walk_nested_s2_pgd(vcpu, gipa, &wi, result);
> + ret = walk_nested_s2_pgd(vcpu, access, &wi, result);
> if (ret)
> result->esr |= (kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ~ESR_ELx_FSC);
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
IIUC, in general terms most of the changes are adapting the typing on
kvm_walk_nested_s2() & co to make use of the new struct kvm_walk_access
instead of just a PA.
I also see that flags & write are also added here, but not used anywhere.
Maybe it would be worth moving them to the patch that makes use of them,
instead leaving them here?
Other than that, seems ok.
Thanks!
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 11:30 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 13:46 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-21 21:28 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 16:18 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 16:51 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-21 21:39 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 17:28 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-09-21 21:45 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-22 14:24 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-09-22 16:14 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-22 16:31 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08 7:35 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 14:09 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 16:46 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 14:38 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 17:16 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-24 17:22 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 15:47 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 16:21 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 20:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 11:10 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 17:03 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 20:23 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 11:20 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 14:35 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:49 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-25 15:07 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 15:18 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 15:51 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 15:53 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:33 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 14:40 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 16:01 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 17:06 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 6:50 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-28 17:21 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-18 14:55 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arFpUtyq7sphiJzw@LeoBrasDK \
--to=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.