[LARTC] Traffic priority.

[LARTC] Traffic priority.

[Alexandru Coseru]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 359 bytes --]

Hello..

Can somebody show me an example of how can I make prioritys for my traffic ?
Like putting www & pop3 on priority 1  , ftp on priority 2 and the bulk traffic to priority 3?


I've searched at lartc.org , but I can not find something like that....




Thanks in advance....


                                                        Alex

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1545 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.

[Stef Coene]

On Saturday 03 May 2003 02:52, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> Hello..
>
> Can somebody show me an example of how can I make prioritys for my traffic
> ? Like putting www & pop3 on priority 1  , ftp on priority 2 and the bulk
> traffic to priority 3?
>
>
> I've searched at lartc.org , but I can not find something like that....
Take a look at the wondershaper (can be found on lartc.org) and I collected 
some info on www.docum.org.
But what do you want do?  Do you want to priorize or do you want to shape?  I 
think it's better you shape the traffic so you can give www&pop3 70% of your 
link, ftp, 20% and bulk the rest.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.

[Alexandru Coseru]

I cannot shape because I have no fixed bandwith..

I mean right now my download goes with 10 kbytes/sec   , an hour ago it was
around 50 kbytes/sec...
I have a special kind of deal with my ISP...   it all depends on how loaded
my ISP is...


So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for me...

I hope you can understand me....

                                                Thanks

Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Alexandru Coseru" <alexcos@home.ro>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.


> On Saturday 03 May 2003 02:52, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> > Hello..
> >
> > Can somebody show me an example of how can I make prioritys for my
traffic
> > ? Like putting www & pop3 on priority 1  , ftp on priority 2 and the
bulk
> > traffic to priority 3?
> >
> >
> > I've searched at lartc.org , but I can not find something like that....
> Take a look at the wondershaper (can be found on lartc.org) and I
collected
> some info on www.docum.org.
> But what do you want do?  Do you want to priorize or do you want to shape?
I
> think it's better you shape the traffic so you can give www&pop3 70% of
your
> link, ftp, 20% and bulk the rest.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.

[Stef Coene]

On Saturday 03 May 2003 15:53, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> I cannot shape because I have no fixed bandwith..
You still can shape if you don't have a fixed bandwidth.

> I mean right now my download goes with 10 kbytes/sec   , an hour ago it was
> around 50 kbytes/sec...
> I have a special kind of deal with my ISP...   it all depends on how loaded
> my ISP is...
Same for me.

> So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for me...
>
> I hope you can understand me....
Yes.
But still it can be done.  You can create a setup for 10kb/s, but if there is 
more bandwidth, it will use more.  But the 70% for www will always be valid.  
It is better if you know your maximum speed, but if you don't, you still can 
shape.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.

[Kjell Chris Flor]

> > So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for
me...
> >
> > I hope you can understand me....
> Yes.
> But still it can be done.  You can create a setup for 10kb/s, but if there
is
> more bandwidth, it will use more.  But the 70% for www will always be
valid.
> It is better if you know your maximum speed, but if you don't, you still
can
> shape.

This is new to me. Could you explain to me with a small example?

Kjell


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/