* Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.
2003-05-03 0:52 [LARTC] Traffic priority Alexandru Coseru
@ 2003-05-03 10:00 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-03 13:53 ` Alexandru Coseru
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-05-03 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Saturday 03 May 2003 02:52, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> Hello..
>
> Can somebody show me an example of how can I make prioritys for my traffic
> ? Like putting www & pop3 on priority 1 , ftp on priority 2 and the bulk
> traffic to priority 3?
>
>
> I've searched at lartc.org , but I can not find something like that....
Take a look at the wondershaper (can be found on lartc.org) and I collected
some info on www.docum.org.
But what do you want do? Do you want to priorize or do you want to shape? I
think it's better you shape the traffic so you can give www&pop3 70% of your
link, ftp, 20% and bulk the rest.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.
2003-05-03 0:52 [LARTC] Traffic priority Alexandru Coseru
2003-05-03 10:00 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-05-03 13:53 ` Alexandru Coseru
2003-05-04 9:59 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-09 15:27 ` Kjell Chris Flor
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexandru Coseru @ 2003-05-03 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I cannot shape because I have no fixed bandwith..
I mean right now my download goes with 10 kbytes/sec , an hour ago it was
around 50 kbytes/sec...
I have a special kind of deal with my ISP... it all depends on how loaded
my ISP is...
So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for me...
I hope you can understand me....
Thanks
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Alexandru Coseru" <alexcos@home.ro>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.
> On Saturday 03 May 2003 02:52, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> > Hello..
> >
> > Can somebody show me an example of how can I make prioritys for my
traffic
> > ? Like putting www & pop3 on priority 1 , ftp on priority 2 and the
bulk
> > traffic to priority 3?
> >
> >
> > I've searched at lartc.org , but I can not find something like that....
> Take a look at the wondershaper (can be found on lartc.org) and I
collected
> some info on www.docum.org.
> But what do you want do? Do you want to priorize or do you want to shape?
I
> think it's better you shape the traffic so you can give www&pop3 70% of
your
> link, ftp, 20% and bulk the rest.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.
2003-05-03 0:52 [LARTC] Traffic priority Alexandru Coseru
2003-05-03 10:00 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-03 13:53 ` Alexandru Coseru
@ 2003-05-04 9:59 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-09 15:27 ` Kjell Chris Flor
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-05-04 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Saturday 03 May 2003 15:53, Alexandru Coseru wrote:
> I cannot shape because I have no fixed bandwith..
You still can shape if you don't have a fixed bandwidth.
> I mean right now my download goes with 10 kbytes/sec , an hour ago it was
> around 50 kbytes/sec...
> I have a special kind of deal with my ISP... it all depends on how loaded
> my ISP is...
Same for me.
> So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for me...
>
> I hope you can understand me....
Yes.
But still it can be done. You can create a setup for 10kb/s, but if there is
more bandwidth, it will use more. But the 70% for www will always be valid.
It is better if you know your maximum speed, but if you don't, you still can
shape.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] Traffic priority.
2003-05-03 0:52 [LARTC] Traffic priority Alexandru Coseru
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-05-04 9:59 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-05-09 15:27 ` Kjell Chris Flor
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kjell Chris Flor @ 2003-05-09 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> > So , I can't put 70% for www , cause I don't know what 100% means for
me...
> >
> > I hope you can understand me....
> Yes.
> But still it can be done. You can create a setup for 10kb/s, but if there
is
> more bandwidth, it will use more. But the 70% for www will always be
valid.
> It is better if you know your maximum speed, but if you don't, you still
can
> shape.
This is new to me. Could you explain to me with a small example?
Kjell
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread