public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
@ 2016-03-01 16:04 Maarten Lankhorst
  2016-03-01 16:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
  2016-03-01 17:27 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2016-03-01 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

This fixes the IGT test, which interprets unknown status as failed to
acquire load detect pipe.

Cc: Gabriel Feceoru <gabriel.feceoru@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
index 505fc5cf26f8..4b2dfa1bb00e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
@@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ intel_crt_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
 		else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
 			status = intel_crt_load_detect(crt,
 				to_intel_crtc(connector->state->crtc)->pipe);
+		else if (i915.load_detect_test)
+			status = connector_status_disconnected;
 		else
 			status = connector_status_unknown;
 		intel_release_load_detect_pipe(connector, &tmp, &ctx);
-- 
2.1.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
  2016-03-01 16:04 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2016-03-01 16:32 ` Patchwork
  2016-03-01 17:27 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-03-01 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3978/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Series 3978v1 drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3978/revisions/1/mbox/

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
                dmesg-warn -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
Test kms_force_connector_basic:
        Subgroup force-load-detect:
                fail       -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
                fail       -> PASS       (snb-dellxps)
                fail       -> PASS       (ilk-hp8440p)
                skip       -> PASS       (ivb-t430s)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
Test pm_rpm:
        Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)

bdw-nuci7        total:169  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11 
bdw-ultra        total:169  pass:155  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
bsw-nuc-2        total:169  pass:136  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:30 
byt-nuc          total:169  pass:144  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:25 
hsw-brixbox      total:169  pass:153  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
hsw-gt2          total:169  pass:159  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10 
ilk-hp8440p      total:169  pass:117  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:50 
ivb-t430s        total:169  pass:154  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
skl-i5k-2        total:169  pass:153  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16 
skl-i7k-2        total:169  pass:153  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16 
snb-dellxps      total:169  pass:144  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23 

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1505/

bb25273010c1ea81428ad36a53058ef286653283 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-03m-01d-15h-09m-38s UTC integration manifest
54419dbfc2c03e8b5150ac1b76a5c20f540b9dfc drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
  2016-03-01 16:04 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested Maarten Lankhorst
  2016-03-01 16:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-03-01 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
  2016-03-01 17:46   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-03-01 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:04:01PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This fixes the IGT test, which interprets unknown status as failed to
> acquire load detect pipe.

Change the expectation of the test?

But more importantly, how can it fail to find a pipe when there's
kmstest_unset_all_crtcs() in the test?

> 
> Cc: Gabriel Feceoru <gabriel.feceoru@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> index 505fc5cf26f8..4b2dfa1bb00e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> @@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ intel_crt_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>  		else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
>  			status = intel_crt_load_detect(crt,
>  				to_intel_crtc(connector->state->crtc)->pipe);
> +		else if (i915.load_detect_test)
> +			status = connector_status_disconnected;
>  		else
>  			status = connector_status_unknown;
>  		intel_release_load_detect_pipe(connector, &tmp, &ctx);
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
  2016-03-01 17:27 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
@ 2016-03-01 17:46   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  2016-03-01 18:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2016-03-01 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx

Op 01-03-16 om 18:27 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:04:01PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> This fixes the IGT test, which interprets unknown status as failed to
>> acquire load detect pipe.
> Change the expectation of the test?
>
> But more importantly, how can it fail to find a pipe when there's
> kmstest_unset_all_crtcs() in the test?
>
It finds a pipe, but because status is connector_status_unknown without this patch it still treats it as failed.

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested.
  2016-03-01 17:46   ` Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2016-03-01 18:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-03-01 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:46:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 01-03-16 om 18:27 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:04:01PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> This fixes the IGT test, which interprets unknown status as failed to
> >> acquire load detect pipe.
> > Change the expectation of the test?
> >
> > But more importantly, how can it fail to find a pipe when there's
> > kmstest_unset_all_crtcs() in the test?
> >
> It finds a pipe, but because status is connector_status_unknown without this patch it still treats it as failed.

Ah, seems I misunderstand everything today. Yeah that makes sense. We
need to distinguish between the failed to get a pipe vs. failed to
detect anything even when we found a pipe.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-01 18:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-01 16:04 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not return unknown status when load detection is tested Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-01 16:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-03-01 17:27 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-01 17:46   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-01 18:01     ` Ville Syrjälä

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox