From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Combine bxt_set_cdclk and cnl_set_cdclk
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:35:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190910123528.GI7482@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190907002143.22591-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:21:38PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> We'd previously combined ICL/TGL logic into the cnl_set_cdclk function,
> but BXT is pretty similar as well. Roll the cnl/icl/tgl logic back into
> the bxt function; the only things we really need to handle separately
> are punit notification and calling different functions to enable/disable
> the cdclk PLL.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Not sure if all the ifs are getting out of hand or not. But I guess
it's still legible.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 267 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 8ac31f8775f0..6b5b1328a3fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1449,6 +1449,39 @@ static void bxt_de_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
> dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = vco;
> }
>
> +static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE);
> + val &= ~BXT_DE_PLL_PLL_ENABLE;
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> +
> + /* Timeout 200us */
> + if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) == 0, 1))
> + DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for CDCLK PLL unlock\n");
> +
> + dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
> +{
> + int ratio = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = CNL_CDCLK_PLL_RATIO(ratio);
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> +
> + val |= BXT_DE_PLL_PLL_ENABLE;
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> +
> + /* Timeout 200us */
> + if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) != 0, 1))
> + DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for CDCLK PLL lock\n");
> +
> + dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = vco;
> +}
> +
> static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state,
> enum pipe pipe)
> @@ -1458,6 +1491,27 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u32 val, divider;
> int ret;
>
> + /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> + ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> + SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
> + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> + else
> + /*
> + * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
> + * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
> + */
> + ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
> + HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> + 0x80000000, 150, 2);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> + ret, cdclk);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* cdclk = vco / 2 / div{1,1.5,2,4} */
> switch (DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, cdclk)) {
> default:
> @@ -1468,63 +1522,82 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1;
> break;
> case 3:
> - WARN(IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv), "Unsupported divider\n");
> + WARN(IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10,
> + "Unsupported divider\n");
> divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1_5;
> break;
> case 4:
> divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2;
> break;
> case 8:
> + WARN(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10, "Unsupported divider\n");
> divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4;
> break;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. BSpec
> - * requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to timeouts;
> - * the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
> - */
> - ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
> - HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> - 0x80000000, 150, 2);
> - if (ret) {
> - DRM_ERROR("PCode CDCLK freq change notify failed (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> - ret, cdclk);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) {
> + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> + dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> + cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
>
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> - bxt_de_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> + cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
>
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> - bxt_de_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
> + } else {
> + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> + dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> + bxt_de_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> +
> + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> + bxt_de_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
> + }
>
> val = divider | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
> - if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> - val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> - else
> - val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> + if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> + val |= TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> + else
> + val |= TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> + if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> + val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> + else
> + val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> + } else {
> + if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> + val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> + else
> + val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Disable SSA Precharge when CD clock frequency < 500 MHz,
> * enable otherwise.
> */
> - if (cdclk >= 500000)
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && cdclk >= 500000)
> val |= BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE;
> I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
>
> if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
> intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>
> - /*
> - * The timeout isn't specified, the 2ms used here is based on
> - * experiment.
> - * FIXME: Waiting for the request completion could be delayed until
> - * the next PCODE request based on BSpec.
> - */
> - ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
> - HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> - cdclk_state->voltage_level, 150, 2);
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) {
> + ret = sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> + cdclk_state->voltage_level);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * The timeout isn't specified, the 2ms used here is based on
> + * experiment.
> + * FIXME: Waiting for the request completion could be delayed
> + * until the next PCODE request based on BSpec.
> + */
> + ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
> + HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> + cdclk_state->voltage_level,
> + 150, 2);
> + }
> +
> if (ret) {
> DRM_ERROR("PCode CDCLK freq set failed, (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> ret, cdclk);
> @@ -1532,6 +1605,13 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> + /*
> + * Can't read out the voltage level :(
> + * Let's just assume everything is as expected.
> + */
> + dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage_level = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
> }
>
> static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1617,115 +1697,6 @@ static void bxt_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> -static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - u32 val;
> -
> - val = I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE);
> - val &= ~BXT_DE_PLL_PLL_ENABLE;
> - I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> -
> - /* Timeout 200us */
> - if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) == 0, 1))
> - DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for CDCLK PLL unlock\n");
> -
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
> -{
> - int ratio = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref);
> - u32 val;
> -
> - val = CNL_CDCLK_PLL_RATIO(ratio);
> - I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> -
> - val |= BXT_DE_PLL_PLL_ENABLE;
> - I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, val);
> -
> - /* Timeout 200us */
> - if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) != 0, 1))
> - DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for CDCLK PLL lock\n");
> -
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = vco;
> -}
> -
> -static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state,
> - enum pipe pipe)
> -{
> - int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> - int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> - u32 val, divider;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> - SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
> - SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> - SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> - if (ret) {
> - DRM_ERROR("Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (%d)\n",
> - ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* cdclk = vco / 2 / div{1,2} */
> - switch (DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(vco, cdclk)) {
> - default:
> - WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.bypass);
> - WARN_ON(vco != 0);
> - /* fall through */
> - case 2:
> - divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_1;
> - break;
> - case 4:
> - divider = BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> - cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> -
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> - cnl_cdclk_pll_enable(dev_priv, vco);
> -
> - val = divider | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
> -
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> - if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> - val |= TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> - else
> - val |= TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> - } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> - if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> - val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> - else
> - val |= ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> - } else {
> - if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
> - val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
> - else
> - val |= BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
> - }
> - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
> -
> - if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
> - intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
> -
> - /* inform PCU of the change */
> - sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> - cdclk_state->voltage_level);
> -
> - intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> -
> - /*
> - * Can't read out the voltage level :(
> - * Let's just assume everything is as expected.
> - */
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage_level = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
> -}
> -
> static void cnl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> u32 cdctl, expected;
> @@ -1806,7 +1777,7 @@ static void icl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> sanitized_state.voltage_level =
> icl_calc_voltage_level(sanitized_state.cdclk);
>
> - cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> + bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> static void icl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1822,7 +1793,7 @@ static void icl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> cdclk_state.voltage_level =
> icl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> - cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> + bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1841,7 +1812,7 @@ static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> cdclk_state.vco = calc_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
> cdclk_state.voltage_level = cnl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> - cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> + bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> static void cnl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1852,7 +1823,7 @@ static void cnl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> cdclk_state.voltage_level = cnl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> - cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> + bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2655,12 +2626,12 @@ void intel_update_rawclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> - dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
> + dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk;
> dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk = icl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> dev_priv->cdclk.table = icl_cdclk_table;
> dev_priv->cdclk.table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_cdclk_table);
> } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> - dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
> + dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk;
> dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk = cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> dev_priv->cdclk.table = cnl_cdclk_table;
> dev_priv->cdclk.table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(cnl_cdclk_table);
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-07 0:21 [PATCH 0/8] cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Matt Roper
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Consolidate bxt/cnl/icl cdclk readout Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Use literal representation of cdclk tables Matt Roper
2019-09-08 2:57 ` Matt Roper
2019-09-08 4:05 ` Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Combine bxt_set_cdclk and cnl_set_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:35 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Kill cnl_sanitize_cdclk() Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_uninit_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add calc_voltage_level display vfunc Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Enhance cdclk sanitization Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_init_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Patchwork
2019-09-07 1:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-09-08 3:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev2) Patchwork
2019-09-08 4:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev3) Patchwork
2019-09-08 4:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-08 5:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190910123528.GI7482@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox