Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_init_cdclk
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:44:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190910124429.GN7482@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190907002143.22591-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:21:43PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> The BXT and CNL functions were already basically identical, whereas
> ICL's function tried to do its own sanitization rather than calling
> bxt_sanitize_cdclk.
> 
> This should actually fix a bug in our ICL initialization where it would
> consider the /2 CD2X divider invalid and force an unnecessary
> sanitization (we now have valid clock frequencies that use this
> divider).
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 65 +---------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 356495591cf9..0ad83d67932d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1719,63 +1719,6 @@ static void bxt_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
>  }
>  
> -static void icl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> -	struct intel_cdclk_state sanitized_state;
> -	u32 val;
> -
> -	/* This sets dev_priv->cdclk.hw. */
> -	intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> -	intel_dump_cdclk_state(&dev_priv->cdclk.hw, "Current CDCLK");
> -
> -	/* This means CDCLK disabled. */
> -	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk == dev_priv->cdclk.hw.bypass)
> -		goto sanitize;
> -
> -	val = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> -
> -	if ((val & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK) != 0)
> -		goto sanitize;
> -
> -	if ((val & CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK) !=
> -	    skl_cdclk_decimal(dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk))
> -		goto sanitize;
> -
> -	return;
> -
> -sanitize:
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitizing cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
> -
> -	sanitized_state.ref = dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref;
> -	sanitized_state.cdclk = calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
> -	sanitized_state.vco = calc_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv,
> -						 sanitized_state.cdclk);
> -	sanitized_state.voltage_level =
> -		dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level(sanitized_state.cdclk);
> -
> -	bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> -}
> -
> -static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> -	struct intel_cdclk_state cdclk_state;
> -
> -	bxt_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv);
> -
> -	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk != 0 &&
> -	    dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0)
> -		return;
> -
> -	cdclk_state = dev_priv->cdclk.hw;
> -
> -	cdclk_state.cdclk = calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
> -	cdclk_state.vco = calc_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
> -	cdclk_state.voltage_level =
> -		dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> -
> -	bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * intel_cdclk_init - Initialize CDCLK
>   * @i915: i915 device
> @@ -1787,14 +1730,10 @@ static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   */
>  void intel_cdclk_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11)
> -		icl_init_cdclk(i915);
> -	else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
> -		cnl_init_cdclk(i915);
> +	if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915) || INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 10)
> +		bxt_init_cdclk(i915);
>  	else if (IS_GEN9_BC(i915))
>  		skl_init_cdclk(i915);
> -	else if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
> -		bxt_init_cdclk(i915);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.20.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-10 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-07  0:21 [PATCH 0/8] cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Matt Roper
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Consolidate bxt/cnl/icl cdclk readout Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:27   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Use literal representation of cdclk tables Matt Roper
2019-09-08  2:57   ` Matt Roper
2019-09-08  4:05     ` Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:56       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Combine bxt_set_cdclk and cnl_set_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:35   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Kill cnl_sanitize_cdclk() Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:37   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_uninit_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:39   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add calc_voltage_level display vfunc Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Enhance cdclk sanitization Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:42   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07  0:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_init_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:44   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-09-07  0:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Patchwork
2019-09-07  1:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-09-08  3:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev2) Patchwork
2019-09-08  4:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev3) Patchwork
2019-09-08  4:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-08  5:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190910124429.GN7482@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox