From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_init_cdclk
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:44:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190910124429.GN7482@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190907002143.22591-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:21:43PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> The BXT and CNL functions were already basically identical, whereas
> ICL's function tried to do its own sanitization rather than calling
> bxt_sanitize_cdclk.
>
> This should actually fix a bug in our ICL initialization where it would
> consider the /2 CD2X divider invalid and force an unnecessary
> sanitization (we now have valid clock frequencies that use this
> divider).
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 65 +---------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 356495591cf9..0ad83d67932d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1719,63 +1719,6 @@ static void bxt_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> }
>
> -static void icl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - struct intel_cdclk_state sanitized_state;
> - u32 val;
> -
> - /* This sets dev_priv->cdclk.hw. */
> - intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> - intel_dump_cdclk_state(&dev_priv->cdclk.hw, "Current CDCLK");
> -
> - /* This means CDCLK disabled. */
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk == dev_priv->cdclk.hw.bypass)
> - goto sanitize;
> -
> - val = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> -
> - if ((val & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK) != 0)
> - goto sanitize;
> -
> - if ((val & CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK) !=
> - skl_cdclk_decimal(dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk))
> - goto sanitize;
> -
> - return;
> -
> -sanitize:
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitizing cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
> -
> - sanitized_state.ref = dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref;
> - sanitized_state.cdclk = calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
> - sanitized_state.vco = calc_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv,
> - sanitized_state.cdclk);
> - sanitized_state.voltage_level =
> - dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level(sanitized_state.cdclk);
> -
> - bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &sanitized_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> -}
> -
> -static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - struct intel_cdclk_state cdclk_state;
> -
> - bxt_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv);
> -
> - if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk != 0 &&
> - dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0)
> - return;
> -
> - cdclk_state = dev_priv->cdclk.hw;
> -
> - cdclk_state.cdclk = calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
> - cdclk_state.vco = calc_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
> - cdclk_state.voltage_level =
> - dev_priv->display.calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> -
> - bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * intel_cdclk_init - Initialize CDCLK
> * @i915: i915 device
> @@ -1787,14 +1730,10 @@ static void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> void intel_cdclk_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11)
> - icl_init_cdclk(i915);
> - else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
> - cnl_init_cdclk(i915);
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915) || INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 10)
> + bxt_init_cdclk(i915);
> else if (IS_GEN9_BC(i915))
> skl_init_cdclk(i915);
> - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
> - bxt_init_cdclk(i915);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-07 0:21 [PATCH 0/8] cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Matt Roper
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Consolidate bxt/cnl/icl cdclk readout Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Use literal representation of cdclk tables Matt Roper
2019-09-08 2:57 ` Matt Roper
2019-09-08 4:05 ` Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Combine bxt_set_cdclk and cnl_set_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Kill cnl_sanitize_cdclk() Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_uninit_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add calc_voltage_level display vfunc Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Enhance cdclk sanitization Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-07 0:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Consolidate {bxt, cnl, icl}_init_cdclk Matt Roper
2019-09-10 12:44 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-09-07 0:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL Patchwork
2019-09-07 1:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-09-08 3:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev2) Patchwork
2019-09-08 4:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for cdclk consolidation and rework for BXT-TGL (rev3) Patchwork
2019-09-08 4:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-08 5:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190910124429.GN7482@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox