From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:57:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210121125708.GB29064@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225171125.28885-20-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Readout the dbuf related stuff during driver init/resume and
> stick it into our dbuf state.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index e3df43f3932d..21ad1adcc1eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -17475,14 +17475,10 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state =
> to_intel_cdclk_state(i915->cdclk.obj.state);
> - struct intel_dbuf_state *dbuf_state =
> - to_intel_dbuf_state(i915->dbuf.obj.state);
>
> intel_update_cdclk(i915);
> intel_dump_cdclk_config(&i915->cdclk.hw, "Current CDCLK");
> cdclk_state->logical = cdclk_state->actual = i915->cdclk.hw;
> -
> - dbuf_state->enabled_slices = i915->dbuf.enabled_slices;
> }
>
> static int sanitize_watermarks_add_affected(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index c11508fb3fac..7edac506d343 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5363,6 +5363,18 @@ static inline bool skl_ddb_entries_overlap(const struct skl_ddb_entry *a,
> return a->start < b->end && b->start < a->end;
> }
>
> +static void skl_ddb_entry_union(struct skl_ddb_entry *a,
> + const struct skl_ddb_entry *b)
> +{
> + if (a->end && b->end) {
> + a->start = min(a->start, b->start);
> + a->end = max(a->end, b->end);
> + } else if (b->end) {
> + a->start = b->start;
> + a->end = b->end;
> + }
> +}
> +
> bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb,
> const struct skl_ddb_entry *entries,
> int num_entries, int ignore_idx)
> @@ -5857,14 +5869,46 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> + struct intel_dbuf_state *dbuf_state =
> + to_intel_dbuf_state(dev_priv->dbuf.obj.state);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>
> for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
> - crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> + enum plane_id plane_id;
>
> skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(crtc, &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal);
> +
> + memset(&dbuf_state->ddb[pipe], 0, sizeof(dbuf_state->ddb[pipe]));
> +
> + for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> + struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_y =
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> + struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_uv =
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
> +
> + skl_ddb_get_hw_plane_state(dev_priv, crtc->pipe,
> + plane_id, ddb_y, ddb_uv);
> +
> + skl_ddb_entry_union(&dbuf_state->ddb[pipe], ddb_y);
> + skl_ddb_entry_union(&dbuf_state->ddb[pipe], ddb_uv);
> + }
> +
> + dbuf_state->slices[pipe] =
> + skl_compute_dbuf_slices(crtc, dbuf_state->active_pipes);
> +
> + dbuf_state->weight[pipe] = intel_crtc_ddb_weight(crtc_state);
> +
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "[CRTC:%d:%s] dbuf slices 0x%x, ddb (%d - %d), active pipes 0x%x\n",
> + crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
> + dbuf_state->slices[pipe], dbuf_state->ddb[pipe].start,
> + dbuf_state->ddb[pipe].end, dbuf_state->active_pipes);
> }
> +
> + dbuf_state->enabled_slices = dev_priv->dbuf.enabled_slices;
> }
>
> static void ilk_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 17:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/i915: Handle some leftover s/intel_crtc/crtc/ Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/i915: Remove garbage WARNs Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/i915: Add missing commas to dbuf tables Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/i915: Make skl_compute_dbuf_slices() behave consistently for all platforms Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:30 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-02 14:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 15:50 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 7:52 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/i915: Polish some dbuf debugs Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 16:29 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 9:53 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:56 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 17:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 17:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 8:28 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:01 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 8:46 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:43 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 8:13 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Nuke skl_ddb_get_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:40 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/i915: Move the dbuf pre/post plane update Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:38 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/i915: Clean up dbuf debugs during .atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 8:41 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/i915: Move pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-27 16:50 ` Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:55 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:57 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/i915: Check slice mask for holes Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:47 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-26 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-29 2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210121125708.GB29064@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox