From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:14:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bda3246008504c979c6322e7ff68e43d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225171125.28885-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8854 bytes --]
>- /* If 2nd DBuf slice required, enable it here */
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && slices_union != hw_enabled_slices)
>- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, slices_union);
>+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, slices_union);
>}
> static void icl_dbuf_slice_post_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>@@ -15307,9 +15306,8 @@ static void icl_dbuf_slice_post_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask;
> u8 required_slices = state->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask;
>- /* If 2nd DBuf slice is no more required disable it */
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices != hw_enabled_slices)
>- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices);
>+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices);
Doesn't make much sense. Just look - previously we were checking if INTEL_GEN is >= than 11(which _is_ ICL)
and now we still _do_ check if INTEL_GEN is >= 11, but... call now function renamed to gen9
I guess you either need to change INTEL_GEN check to be >=9 to at least look somewhat consistent
or leave it as is. Or at least rename icl_ prefix to gen11_ otherwise that looks inconsistent, i.e
you are now checking that gen is >= 11 and then OK - now let's call gen 9! :)
Stan
________________________________
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 7:11:12 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
The low level dbuf slice code is rather inconsitent with its
functiona naming and organization. Make it more consistent.
Also share the enable/disable functions between all platforms
since the same code works just fine for all of them.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 +--
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 44 ++++++++-----------
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 6 +--
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 3031e64ee518..6952c398cc43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -15296,9 +15296,8 @@ static void icl_dbuf_slice_pre_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
u8 required_slices = state->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask;
u8 slices_union = hw_enabled_slices | required_slices;
- /* If 2nd DBuf slice required, enable it here */
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && slices_union != hw_enabled_slices)
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, slices_union);
+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, slices_union);
}
static void icl_dbuf_slice_post_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
@@ -15307,9 +15306,8 @@ static void icl_dbuf_slice_post_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask;
u8 required_slices = state->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask;
- /* If 2nd DBuf slice is no more required disable it */
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices != hw_enabled_slices)
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices);
+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices);
}
static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index e81e561e8ac0..ce3bbc4c7a27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -4433,15 +4433,18 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
}
-static void intel_dbuf_slice_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- enum dbuf_slice slice, bool enable)
+static void gen9_dbuf_slice_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ enum dbuf_slice slice, bool enable)
{
i915_reg_t reg = DBUF_CTL_S(slice);
bool state;
u32 val;
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg);
- val = enable ? (val | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST) : (val & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
+ if (enable)
+ val |= DBUF_POWER_REQUEST;
+ else
+ val &= ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST;
intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, val);
intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, reg);
udelay(10);
@@ -4452,18 +4455,8 @@ static void intel_dbuf_slice_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
slice, enable ? "enable" : "disable");
}
-static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, BIT(DBUF_S1));
-}
-
-static void gen9_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, 0);
-}
-
-void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- u8 req_slices)
+void gen9_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ u8 req_slices)
{
int num_slices = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_supported_dbuf_slices;
struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
@@ -4486,28 +4479,29 @@ void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
for (slice = DBUF_S1; slice < num_slices; slice++)
- intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, slice,
- req_slices & BIT(slice));
+ gen9_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, slice, req_slices & BIT(slice));
dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask = req_slices;
mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
}
-static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv);
+ dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask =
+ intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_mask(dev_priv);
+
/*
* Just power up at least 1 slice, we will
* figure out later which slices we have and what we need.
*/
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask |
- BIT(DBUF_S1));
+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, BIT(DBUF_S1) |
+ dev_priv->enabled_dbuf_slices_mask);
}
-static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+static void gen9_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, 0);
+ gen9_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, 0);
}
static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -5067,7 +5061,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
intel_cdclk_init_hw(dev_priv);
/* 5. Enable DBUF. */
- icl_dbuf_enable(dev_priv);
+ gen9_dbuf_enable(dev_priv);
/* 6. Setup MBUS. */
icl_mbus_init(dev_priv);
@@ -5090,7 +5084,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
/* 1. Disable all display engine functions -> aready done */
/* 2. Disable DBUF */
- icl_dbuf_disable(dev_priv);
+ gen9_dbuf_disable(dev_priv);
/* 3. Disable CD clock */
intel_cdclk_uninit_hw(dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
index 601e000ffd0d..1a275611241e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
@@ -312,13 +312,13 @@ enum dbuf_slice {
DBUF_S2,
};
+void gen9_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ u8 req_slices);
+
#define with_intel_display_power(i915, domain, wf) \
for ((wf) = intel_display_power_get((i915), (domain)); (wf); \
intel_display_power_put_async((i915), (domain), (wf)), (wf) = 0)
-void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- u8 req_slices);
-
void chv_phy_powergate_lanes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
bool override, unsigned int mask);
bool chv_phy_powergate_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy,
--
2.24.1
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 22168 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 17:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/i915: Handle some leftover s/intel_crtc/crtc/ Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/i915: Remove garbage WARNs Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/i915: Add missing commas to dbuf tables Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/i915: Make skl_compute_dbuf_slices() behave consistently for all platforms Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:30 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-02 14:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 15:50 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 7:52 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/i915: Polish some dbuf debugs Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 16:29 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 9:53 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:56 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 17:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2020-03-04 17:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 8:28 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:01 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 8:46 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:43 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 8:13 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Nuke skl_ddb_get_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:40 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/i915: Move the dbuf pre/post plane update Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:38 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/i915: Clean up dbuf debugs during .atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 8:41 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/i915: Move pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-27 16:50 ` Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:55 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:57 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/i915: Check slice mask for holes Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:47 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-26 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-29 2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bda3246008504c979c6322e7ff68e43d@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox