From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:32:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225171125.28885-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Make life a bit simpler by sticking a sentinel at the end of
> the dbuf slice arrays. This way we don't need to pass in the
> size. Also unify the types (u8 vs. u32) for active_pipes.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index abeb4b19071f..a2e78969c0df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3843,7 +3843,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> }
>
> static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - u32 active_pipes);
> + u8 active_pipes);
>
> static void
> skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -4228,6 +4228,7 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry icl_allowed_dbufs[] =
> [PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
> },
> },
> + {}
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -4350,16 +4351,15 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry tgl_allowed_dbufs[] =
> [PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
> },
> },
> + {}
> };
>
> -static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> - u32 active_pipes,
> - const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices,
> - int size)
> +static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes,
> + const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes; i++) {
> if (dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes == active_pipes)
> return dbuf_slices[i].dbuf_mask[pipe];
> }
> @@ -4371,8 +4371,7 @@ static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> * returns correspondent DBuf slice mask as stated in BSpec for particular
> * platform.
> */
> -static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> - u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
> {
> /*
> * FIXME: For ICL this is still a bit unclear as prev BSpec revision
> @@ -4386,32 +4385,25 @@ static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> * still here - we will need it once those additional constraints
> * pop up.
> */
> - return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> - icl_allowed_dbufs,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(icl_allowed_dbufs));
> + return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, icl_allowed_dbufs);
> }
>
> -static u32 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> - u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
> {
> - return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> - tgl_allowed_dbufs,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_allowed_dbufs));
> + return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, tgl_allowed_dbufs);
> }
>
> static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - u32 active_pipes)
> + u8 active_pipes)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>
> if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12))
> - return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> - active_pipes);
> + return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
> else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11))
> - return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> - active_pipes);
> + return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
> /*
> * For anything else just return one slice yet.
> * Should be extended for other platforms.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 17:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/i915: Handle some leftover s/intel_crtc/crtc/ Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/i915: Remove garbage WARNs Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/i915: Add missing commas to dbuf tables Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 9:32 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/i915: Make skl_compute_dbuf_slices() behave consistently for all platforms Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:30 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-02 14:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 15:50 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 7:52 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/i915: Polish some dbuf debugs Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 16:29 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 9:53 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:56 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 17:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 17:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 8:28 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:01 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 8:46 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:43 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01 8:13 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Nuke skl_ddb_get_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:40 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/i915: Move the dbuf pre/post plane update Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:38 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/i915: Clean up dbuf debugs during .atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 8:41 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/i915: Move pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-27 16:50 ` Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:55 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:57 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/i915: Check slice mask for holes Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:47 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-26 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-29 2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox