Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:32:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225171125.28885-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Make life a bit simpler by sticking a sentinel at the end of
> the dbuf slice arrays. This way we don't need to pass in the
> size. Also unify the types (u8 vs. u32) for active_pipes.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index abeb4b19071f..a2e78969c0df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3843,7 +3843,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  }
>  
>  static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -				  u32 active_pipes);
> +				  u8 active_pipes);
>  
>  static void
>  skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -4228,6 +4228,7 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry icl_allowed_dbufs[] =
>  			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{}
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -4350,16 +4351,15 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry tgl_allowed_dbufs[] =
>  			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{}
>  };
>  
> -static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -			      u32 active_pipes,
> -			      const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices,
> -			      int size)
> +static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes,
> +			      const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes; i++) {
>  		if (dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes == active_pipes)
>  			return dbuf_slices[i].dbuf_mask[pipe];
>  	}
> @@ -4371,8 +4371,7 @@ static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
>   * returns correspondent DBuf slice mask as stated in BSpec for particular
>   * platform.
>   */
> -static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -				   u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME: For ICL this is still a bit unclear as prev BSpec revision
> @@ -4386,32 +4385,25 @@ static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
>  	 * still here - we will need it once those additional constraints
>  	 * pop up.
>  	 */
> -	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> -				   icl_allowed_dbufs,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(icl_allowed_dbufs));
> +	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, icl_allowed_dbufs);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -				   u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
>  {
> -	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> -				   tgl_allowed_dbufs,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_allowed_dbufs));
> +	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, tgl_allowed_dbufs);
>  }
>  
>  static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -				  u32 active_pipes)
> +				  u8 active_pipes)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  
>  	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12))
> -		return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> -					       active_pipes);
> +		return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
>  	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11))
> -		return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> -					       active_pipes);
> +		return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
>  	/*
>  	 * For anything else just return one slice yet.
>  	 * Should be extended for other platforms.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-25 17:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/i915: Handle some leftover s/intel_crtc/crtc/ Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:29   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/i915: Remove garbage WARNs Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/i915: Add missing commas to dbuf tables Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:32   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/i915: Make skl_compute_dbuf_slices() behave consistently for all platforms Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:30   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-02 14:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 15:50       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01  7:52       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/i915: Polish some dbuf debugs Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 16:29   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:26     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05  9:53       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:46         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:56           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 17:14   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 17:23   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:30     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05  8:28       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:37         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:01           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05  8:46   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:43   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01  8:13   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Nuke skl_ddb_get_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:40   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/i915: Move the dbuf pre/post plane update Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:38   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/i915: Clean up dbuf debugs during .atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  8:41   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/i915: Move pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-27 16:50   ` Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:55   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:57   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/i915: Check slice mask for holes Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:47   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-26 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-29  2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox