From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 5 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 20 ++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 34 ++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 10 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 6083b9c14be6..821cb40f8d73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops,
struct lock_class_key *key, unsigned flags)
{
- __mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock, ops->name ?: "obj->mm.lock", key);
+ mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock);
spin_lock_init(&obj->vma.lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->vma.list);
@@ -86,9 +86,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_page.lock);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.lock);
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj))
- fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&obj->mm.lock);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index b5af9c440ac5..a0e1c4ff0de4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -372,27 +372,10 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
-enum i915_mm_subclass { /* lockdep subclass for obj->mm.lock/struct_mutex */
- I915_MM_NORMAL = 0,
- /*
- * Only used by struct_mutex, when called "recursively" from
- * direct-reclaim-esque. Safe because there is only every one
- * struct_mutex in the entire system.
- */
- I915_MM_SHRINKER = 1,
- /*
- * Used for obj->mm.lock when allocating pages. Safe because the object
- * isn't yet on any LRU, and therefore the shrinker can't deadlock on
- * it. As soon as the object has pages, obj->mm.lock nests within
- * fs_reclaim.
- */
- I915_MM_GET_PAGES = 1,
-};
-
static inline int __must_check
i915_gem_object_pin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
- might_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+ might_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))
return 0;
@@ -436,6 +419,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
}
int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index e7d7650072c5..e947d4c0da1f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
int err;
- err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+ err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -196,21 +196,13 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
return pages;
}
-int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct sg_table *pages;
- int err;
if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
return -EBUSY;
- /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
- mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
- if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))) {
- err = -EBUSY;
- goto unlock;
- }
-
i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj);
/*
@@ -226,14 +218,22 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
* get_pages backends we should be better able to handle the
* cancellation of the async task in a more uniform manner.
*/
- if (!pages)
- pages = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
- if (!IS_ERR(pages))
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages);
- err = 0;
-unlock:
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ /* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
+ mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
+ err = __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj);
mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
return err;
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
!i915_gem_object_type_has(obj, I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM))
return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
- err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+ err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
if (err)
return ERR_PTR(err);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
index 06c481ff79d8..44329c435cf1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align)
if (err)
return err;
- err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+ err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
if (err)
goto err_unlock;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index b64a0788381f..3052ef5ad89d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ static bool unsafe_drop_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
flags = I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_TEST;
if (i915_gem_object_unbind(obj, flags) == 0)
- __i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
+ return true;
- return !i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj);
+ return false;
}
static void try_to_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
@@ -200,10 +200,10 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags);
- if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink)) {
+ if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink) &&
+ mutex_trylock(&obj->mm.lock)) {
/* May arrive from get_pages on another bo */
- mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
- if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
+ if (!__i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj)) {
try_to_writeback(obj, shrink);
count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 1e42fbc68697..503325e74eff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_userptr_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool
if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)))
return -EBUSY;
- mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+ mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj);
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
--
2.31.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 15:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-03-24 11:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox