From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:37:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFsybn94Z8Rj94s4@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-28-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:50:16PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Take the ww lock around engine_unpark. Because of the
> many many places where rpm is used, I chose the safest option
> and used a trylock to opportunistically take this lock for
> __engine_unpark.
Correct choice, runtime pm resume is on the critical path for dma-fence
(we might need to wake up the device for e.g. atomic modeset commits), so
definitely can't have a dma_resv_lock in here.
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> index 27d9d17b35cb..bddc5c98fb04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> @@ -27,12 +27,16 @@ static void dbg_poison_ce(struct intel_context *ce)
> int type = i915_coherent_map_type(ce->engine->i915);
> void *map;
>
> + if (!i915_gem_object_trylock(obj))
> + return;
> +
> map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
> if (!IS_ERR(map)) {
> memset(map, CONTEXT_REDZONE, obj->base.size);
> i915_gem_object_flush_map(obj);
> i915_gem_object_unpin_map(obj);
> }
> + i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 15:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFsybn94Z8Rj94s4@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox