Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:31:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79e6f35b-0df6-0f45-e349-8f49529f7382@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0jSHPL44qRd7dybPmmEz-8pr8xS0d9VXhRYm8iNj3YyX7h-A@mail.gmail.com>

Op 23-03-2021 om 18:30 schreef Matthew Auld:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 15:51, Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
>> when it starts taking it.
>>
>> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
>> by retrieving it from the obj.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  7 ++++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c      |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  1 +
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c    |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c     | 21 +++++++++++++++----
>>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c |  8 ++++---
>>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen7_renderclear.c    |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c           |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_renderstate.c   |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c          |  2 +-
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c   |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c      |  7 ++++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.h      |  3 ++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c   |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c         |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c        |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c        | 10 ++++-----
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c    |  6 +++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c         |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c              |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c  |  2 +-
>>  24 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>> index dcfcae9c841b..73dd2a7673f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>>         if (err)
>>                 goto err_pool;
>>
>> -       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
>> +       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, &eb->ww, pool->type);
>>         if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
>>                 err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
>>                 goto err_pool;
>> @@ -2489,7 +2489,8 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>>                         goto err_shadow;
>>         }
>>
>> -       pw->shadow_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(shadow->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
>> +       pw->shadow_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(shadow->obj, &eb->ww,
>> +                                                I915_MAP_WB);
>>         if (IS_ERR(pw->shadow_map)) {
>>                 err = PTR_ERR(pw->shadow_map);
>>                 goto err_trampoline;
>> @@ -2500,7 +2501,7 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>>
>>         pw->batch_map = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>         if (needs_clflush && i915_has_memcpy_from_wc())
>> -               pw->batch_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch, I915_MAP_WC);
>> +               pw->batch_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch, &eb->ww, I915_MAP_WC);
>>
>>         if (IS_ERR(pw->batch_map)) {
>>                 err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(batch);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> index 2561a2f1e54f..edac8ee3be9a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ vm_access(struct vm_area_struct *area, unsigned long addr,
>>                 goto out;
>>
>>         /* As this is primarily for debugging, let's focus on simplicity */
>> -       vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_FORCE_WC);
>> +       vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, &ww, I915_MAP_FORCE_WC);
>>         if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
>>                 err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>>                 goto out;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
>> index 1a8ec4035112..9bd9b47dcc8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
>> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>>   * ERR_PTR() on error.
>>   */
>>  void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> +                                          struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
>>                                            enum i915_map_type type);
>>
>>  void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
>> index df8e8c18c6c9..fae18622d2da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_emit_vma_fill_blt(struct intel_context *ce,
>>         /* we pinned the pool, mark it as such */
>>         intel_gt_buffer_pool_mark_used(pool);
>>
>> -       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
>> +       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, ww, pool->type);
>>         if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
>>                 err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
>>                 goto out_unpin;
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_emit_vma_copy_blt(struct intel_context *ce,
>>         /* we pinned the pool, mark it as such */
>>         intel_gt_buffer_pool_mark_used(pool);
>>
>> -       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
>> +       cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, ww, pool->type);
>>         if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
>>                 err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
>>                 goto out_unpin;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
>> index 58e222030e10..232832398457 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
>> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static void *i915_gem_object_map_pfn(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>
>>  /* get, pin, and map the pages of the object into kernel space */
>>  void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> +                             struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
>>                               enum i915_map_type type)
>>  {
>>         enum i915_map_type has_type;
>> @@ -408,13 +409,25 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>  void *i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>                                        enum i915_map_type type)
>>  {
>> +       struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
>>         void *ret;
>> +       int err;
>>
>> -       i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
>> -       ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
>> -       i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
>> +       i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
>> +retry:
>> +       err = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
>> +       if (!err)
>> +               ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, &ww, type);
>> +       if (IS_ERR(ret))
> This looks a little dodgy, since ret might not be initialized here,
> say if we encounter an error when grabbing the lock?
>
> Also maybe s/ret/ptr/? Seeing ret makes me think it's a plain integer.

Ack, good catch!

Will send a new version to fix it.

~Maarten

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23 15:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25  9:23       ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25  9:55         ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:58         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24  9:31     ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-03-24 10:11       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:54         ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79e6f35b-0df6-0f45-e349-8f49529f7382@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.william.auld@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox