Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:16:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFtz/KiStRF3uQUc@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFtzuLjmMAU030wn@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:15:36PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:00:12PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:50:52PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > We get a lockdep splat when the reset mutex is held, because it can be
> > > taken from fence_wait. This conflicts with the mmu notifier we have,
> > > because we recurse between reset mutex and mmap lock -> mmu notifier.
> > > 
> > > Remove this recursion by calling revoke_mmaps before taking the lock.
> > > 
> > > The reset code still needs fixing, as taking mmap locks during reset
> > > is not allowed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> > > index 990cb4adbb9a..447f589750c2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> > > @@ -970,8 +970,6 @@ static int do_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, intel_engine_mask_t stalled_mask)
> > >  {
> > >  	int err, i;
> > >  
> > > -	gt_revoke(gt);
> > > -
> > >  	err = __intel_gt_reset(gt, ALL_ENGINES);
> > >  	for (i = 0; err && i < RESET_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
> > >  		msleep(10 * (i + 1));
> > > @@ -1026,6 +1024,9 @@ void intel_gt_reset(struct intel_gt *gt,
> > >  
> > >  	might_sleep();
> > >  	GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_RESET_BACKOFF, &gt->reset.flags));
> > > +
> > 
> > I've added a FIXME comment here just so we don't totally forget. This will
> > also blow up again when we wrap the entire reset path into a dma_fence
> > critical section annotation (at least going forward, we can't do that on
> > hw that needs display reset with the current code unfortunately).
> > 
> > But I did look at the code which originally added this in
> > 
> > commit 2caffbf1176256cc4f8d4e5c3c524fc689cb9876
> > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Date:   Fri Feb 8 15:37:03 2019 +0000
> > 
> >     drm/i915: Revoke mmaps and prevent access to fence registers across reset
> > 
> > and noped right out.
> > 
> > I think this complexity needs to go entirely, and instead we just protect
> > the fence register state to make sure that after reset they are all good
> > again:
> > - add a new mutex for low level fence register state
> > - hold that mutex around fence register writes (really just the low level
> >   fence writes)
> > - hold it in the reset path when we restore fence registers
> > 
> > This means that a global reset also thrashes mmaps, but it's a global
> > reset we're talking about here, everything is thrash anyway. Plus/minus
> > fenced gtt mmaps really doesn't change the tally.
> 
> My recollection is that GPU reset doesn't actually clobber the fence 
> registers. Though not 100% sure I can trust my brain on this. Also
> dunno if it actually matter here or not, but figured I'd point it out.

I think on gen2/3 it does, because there everything goes over. But yeah
maybe on gen4+ it's all fine, would be worth to check that.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23 15:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25  9:23       ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25  9:55         ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16       ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-03-24 17:58         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24  9:31     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 10:11       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:54         ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFtz/KiStRF3uQUc@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox