From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:11:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFsQQfwwyZhq5BBF@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79e6f35b-0df6-0f45-e349-8f49529f7382@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 23-03-2021 om 18:30 schreef Matthew Auld:
> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 15:51, Maarten Lankhorst
> > <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
> >> when it starts taking it.
> >>
> >> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
> >> by retrieving it from the obj.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 7 ++++---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 1 +
> >> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 21 +++++++++++++++----
> >> .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 8 ++++---
> >> .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen7_renderclear.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_renderstate.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 2 +-
> >> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c | 7 ++++---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.h | 3 ++-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c | 10 ++++-----
> >> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c | 6 +++---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 2 +-
> >> 24 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> >> index dcfcae9c841b..73dd2a7673f5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> >> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
> >> if (err)
> >> goto err_pool;
> >>
> >> - cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
> >> + cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, &eb->ww, pool->type);
> >> if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
> >> err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
> >> goto err_pool;
> >> @@ -2489,7 +2489,8 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
> >> goto err_shadow;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - pw->shadow_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(shadow->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
> >> + pw->shadow_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(shadow->obj, &eb->ww,
> >> + I915_MAP_WB);
> >> if (IS_ERR(pw->shadow_map)) {
> >> err = PTR_ERR(pw->shadow_map);
> >> goto err_trampoline;
> >> @@ -2500,7 +2501,7 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
> >>
> >> pw->batch_map = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >> if (needs_clflush && i915_has_memcpy_from_wc())
> >> - pw->batch_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch, I915_MAP_WC);
> >> + pw->batch_map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch, &eb->ww, I915_MAP_WC);
> >>
> >> if (IS_ERR(pw->batch_map)) {
> >> err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(batch);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> >> index 2561a2f1e54f..edac8ee3be9a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> >> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ vm_access(struct vm_area_struct *area, unsigned long addr,
> >> goto out;
> >>
> >> /* As this is primarily for debugging, let's focus on simplicity */
> >> - vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_FORCE_WC);
> >> + vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, &ww, I915_MAP_FORCE_WC);
> >> if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
> >> err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
> >> goto out;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> >> index 1a8ec4035112..9bd9b47dcc8d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> >> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> >> * ERR_PTR() on error.
> >> */
> >> void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
> >> enum i915_map_type type);
> >>
> >> void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> >> index df8e8c18c6c9..fae18622d2da 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> >> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_emit_vma_fill_blt(struct intel_context *ce,
> >> /* we pinned the pool, mark it as such */
> >> intel_gt_buffer_pool_mark_used(pool);
> >>
> >> - cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
> >> + cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, ww, pool->type);
> >> if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
> >> err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
> >> goto out_unpin;
> >> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_emit_vma_copy_blt(struct intel_context *ce,
> >> /* we pinned the pool, mark it as such */
> >> intel_gt_buffer_pool_mark_used(pool);
> >>
> >> - cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, pool->type);
> >> + cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, ww, pool->type);
> >> if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
> >> err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
> >> goto out_unpin;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> >> index 58e222030e10..232832398457 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> >> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static void *i915_gem_object_map_pfn(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >>
> >> /* get, pin, and map the pages of the object into kernel space */
> >> void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
> >> enum i915_map_type type)
> >> {
> >> enum i915_map_type has_type;
> >> @@ -408,13 +409,25 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> void *i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> enum i915_map_type type)
> >> {
> >> + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
> >> void *ret;
> >> + int err;
> >>
> >> - i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
> >> - ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
> >> - i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
> >> + i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
> >> +retry:
> >> + err = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
> >> + if (!err)
> >> + ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, &ww, type);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(ret))
> > This looks a little dodgy, since ret might not be initialized here,
> > say if we encounter an error when grabbing the lock?
> >
> > Also maybe s/ret/ptr/? Seeing ret makes me think it's a plain integer.
>
> Ack, good catch!
>
> Will send a new version to fix it.
Can you pls just update this patch with in-reply-to? I'm starting to
apply.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 15:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-25 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-25 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-03-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFsQQfwwyZhq5BBF@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox