Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Add ddb allocation support
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 20:10:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210515031035.2561658-12-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210515031035.2561658-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

From: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>

On adlp the two mbuses have two display pipes and
two DBUFS, Pipe A and D on Mbus1 and Pipe B and C on
Mbus2. The Mbus can be joined and all the DBUFS can be
used on Pipe A or B.

Bspec: 49255
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |  22 ++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 65af0d84d75b..47be6054d480 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -7308,7 +7308,7 @@ enum {
 
 #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_B			0x7127c
 #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_2_B			0x7137c
-#define  DDB_ENTRY_MASK				0x7FF /* skl+: 10 bits, icl+ 11 bits */
+#define  DDB_ENTRY_MASK				0xFFF /* skl+: 10 bits, icl+ 11 bits, adlp+ 12 bits */
 #define  DDB_ENTRY_END_SHIFT			16
 #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1(pipe)	\
 	_PIPE(pipe, _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_A, _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_B)
@@ -8145,9 +8145,23 @@ enum {
 #define  DISP_DATA_PARTITION_5_6	(1 << 6)
 #define  DISP_IPC_ENABLE		(1 << 3)
 
-#define _DBUF_CTL_S1				0x45008
-#define _DBUF_CTL_S2				0x44FE8
-#define DBUF_CTL_S(slice)			_MMIO(_PICK_EVEN(slice, _DBUF_CTL_S1, _DBUF_CTL_S2))
+/*
+ * The below are numbered starting from "S1" on gen11/gen12, but starting
+ * with gen13 display, the bspec switches to a 0-based numbering scheme
+ * (although the addresses stay the same so new S0 = old S1, new S1 = old S2).
+ * We'll just use the 0-based numbering here for all platforms since it's the
+ * way things will be named by the hardware team going forward, plus it's more
+ * consistent with how most of the rest of our registers are named.
+ */
+#define _DBUF_CTL_S0				0x45008
+#define _DBUF_CTL_S1				0x44FE8
+#define _DBUF_CTL_S2				0x44300
+#define _DBUF_CTL_S3				0x44304
+#define DBUF_CTL_S(slice)			_MMIO(_PICK(slice, \
+							    _DBUF_CTL_S0, \
+							    _DBUF_CTL_S1, \
+							    _DBUF_CTL_S2, \
+							    _DBUF_CTL_S3))
 #define  DBUF_POWER_REQUEST			REG_BIT(31)
 #define  DBUF_POWER_STATE			REG_BIT(30)
 #define  DBUF_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE_MASK	REG_GENMASK(23, 19)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 95fda20d5547..411ec468d02a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4558,6 +4558,118 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry tgl_allowed_dbufs[] =
 	{}
 };
 
+static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry adlp_allowed_dbufs[] = {
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_C),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_C),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.active_pipes = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D),
+		.dbuf_mask = {
+			[PIPE_A] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+			[PIPE_B] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S3) | BIT(DBUF_S4),
+			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2),
+		},
+	},
+	{}
+
+};
+
 static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes,
 			      const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices)
 {
@@ -4597,12 +4709,19 @@ static u8 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
 	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, tgl_allowed_dbufs);
 }
 
+static u32 adlp_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u32 active_pipes)
+{
+	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, adlp_allowed_dbufs);
+}
+
 static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(struct intel_crtc *crtc, u8 active_pipes)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
 	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 12)
+	if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
+		return adlp_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
+	else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 12)
 		return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
 	else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11)
 		return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
-- 
2.25.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-15  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-15  3:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/23] Alder Lake-P Support Matt Roper
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 01/23] drm/i915/xelpd: Enhanced pipe underrun reporting Matt Roper
2021-05-17  6:52   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 02/23] drm/i915/xelpd: Support DP1.4 compression BPPs Matt Roper
2021-05-17 15:18   ` Jani Nikula
2021-05-18  6:33     ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 03/23] drm/i915/xelpd: Calculate VDSC RC parameters Matt Roper
2021-05-18 18:06   ` Navare, Manasi
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 04/23] drm/i915/xelpd: Add rc_qp_table for rcparams calculation Matt Roper
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 05/23] drm/i915/xelpd: Add VRR guardband for VRR CTL Matt Roper
2021-05-24 13:40   ` Aditya Swarup
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 06/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Add dedicated SAGV watermarks Matt Roper
2021-05-17  6:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 07/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Setup ports/phys Matt Roper
2021-05-17 18:01   ` Imre Deak
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 08/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Handle TC cold Matt Roper
2021-05-17 14:53   ` Imre Deak
2021-05-17 23:15     ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-17 23:22       ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 09/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Implement TC sequences Matt Roper
2021-05-17 15:12   ` Imre Deak
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Don't config MBUS and DBUF during display initialization Matt Roper
2021-05-18 11:58   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-05-15  3:10 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2021-05-18 12:22   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Add ddb allocation support Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 12/23] drm/i915: Introduce MBUS relative dbuf offsets Matt Roper
2021-05-17  6:38   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 13/23] drm/i915/adl_p: MBUS programming Matt Roper
2023-07-17 10:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 14/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Tx escape clock with DSI Matt Roper
2021-05-17  7:36   ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 15/23] drm/i915/display: Replace dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct Matt Roper
2021-05-17  6:39   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 16/23] drm/i915/display: Remove a redundant function argument from intel_psr_enable_source() Matt Roper
2021-05-19  6:49   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 17/23] drm/i915/display: Add PSR interrupt error check function Matt Roper
2021-05-17 17:03   ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 18/23] drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function Matt Roper
2021-05-17 16:58   ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-18  9:33     ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2021-05-18 11:06       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-05-21 10:58         ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2021-05-21 21:52           ` Souza, Jose
2021-06-01 10:23             ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 19/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Define and use ADL-P specific DP translation tables Matt Roper
2021-05-17 23:02   ` Clint Taylor
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 20/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Add PLL Support Matt Roper
2021-05-17 21:55   ` Clint Taylor
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 21/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Program DP/HDMI link rate to DDI_BUF_CTL Matt Roper
2021-05-17 17:01   ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 22/23] drm/i915/adlp: Add PIPE_MISC2 programming Matt Roper
2021-05-17 21:46   ` Clint Taylor
2021-05-15  3:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 23/23] drm/i915/adl_p: Update memory bandwidth parameters Matt Roper
2021-05-17 17:02   ` Souza, Jose
2021-05-15  4:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Alder Lake-P Support (rev3) Patchwork
2021-05-15  4:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-15  5:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-05-17 23:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Alder Lake-P Support (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210515031035.2561658-12-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox