From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm/i915: Compute CMRR and calculate vtotal
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:04:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d3e0a8c-7bd8-426c-bcac-93ad38af2227@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240524102432.2499104-4-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
On 5/24/2024 3:54 PM, Mitul Golani wrote:
> Compute Fixed Average Vtotal/CMRR with resepect to
> userspace VRR enablement. Also calculate required
> parameters in case of CMRR is enabled. During
> intel_vrr_compute_config, CMRR is getting enabled
> based on userspace has enabled Variable refresh mode
> with VRR timing generator or not. Make CMRR as small subset of
> FAVT mode, when Panel is running on Fixed refresh rate
> and on VRR framework then only enable CMRR to match with
> actual refresh rate.
>
> --v2:
> - Update is_cmrr_frac_required function return as bool, not int. [Jani]
> - Use signed int math instead of unsigned in cmrr_get_vtotal2. [Jani]
> - Fix typo and usage of camel case in cmrr_get_vtotal. [Jani]
> - Use do_div in cmrr_get_vtotalwhile calculating cmrr_m. [ Jani]
> - Simplify cmrr and vrr compute config in intel_vrr_compute_config. [Jani]
> - Correct valiable name usage in is_cmrr_frac_required. [Ville]
>
> --v3:
> - Removing RFC tag.
>
> --v4:
> - Added edp check to address edp usecase for now. (ville)
> - Updated is_cmrr_fraction_required to more simplified calculation.
> - on longterm goal to be worked upon uapi as suggestion from ville.
>
> --v5:
> - Correct vtotal paramas accuracy and add 2 digit precision.
> - Avoid using DIV_ROUND_UP and improve scanline precision.
>
> --v6:
> - Make CMRR a small subset of FAVT mode.
>
> --v7:
> - Update commit message to avoid confusion with Legacy VRR (Ankit).
> - Add cmrr.enable in last, so remove from this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 803360fcb0cc..f7e82d1e2bf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5437,6 +5437,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vsync_end);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_LLI(cmrr.cmrr_m);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_LLI(cmrr.cmrr_n);
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(cmrr.enable);
> }
>
> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> index 17ddf82f0b6e..b372b1acc19b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
> BIT(trans)) != 0)
> #define HAS_VRR(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> #define HAS_AS_SDP(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13)
> +#define HAS_CMRR(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20)
> #define INTEL_NUM_PIPES(i915) (hweight8(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->pipe_mask))
> #define I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_hotplug)
> #define OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->overlay_needs_physical)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> index 3b250e92af98..3fbedd7366bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
> #include "intel_vrr_reg.h"
> #include "intel_dp.h"
>
> +#define FIXED_POINT_PRECISION 100
> +#define CMRR_PRECISION_TOLERANCE 10
> +
> bool intel_vrr_is_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->base.display_info;
> @@ -107,6 +110,59 @@ int intel_vrr_vmax_vblank_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> return crtc_state->vrr.vmax - intel_vrr_vblank_exit_length(crtc_state);
> }
>
> +static bool
> +is_cmrr_frac_required(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool is_edp)
> +{
> + int calculated_refresh_k, actual_refresh_k, pixel_clock_per_line;
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> +
> + if (!(HAS_CMRR(i915) && is_edp))
> + return false;
> +
> + actual_refresh_k =
> + drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode) * FIXED_POINT_PRECISION;
> + pixel_clock_per_line =
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock * 1000 / adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal;
> + calculated_refresh_k =
> + pixel_clock_per_line * FIXED_POINT_PRECISION / adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal;
> +
> + if ((actual_refresh_k - calculated_refresh_k) < CMRR_PRECISION_TOLERANCE)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int
> +cmrr_get_vtotal(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + int multiplier_m = 1, multiplier_n = 1, vtotal;
> + int actual_refresh_rate, desired_refresh_rate;
> + long long actual_pixel_rate, adjusted_pixel_rate, pixel_clock_per_line;
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +
> + pixel_clock_per_line =
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock * 1000 / adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal;
> + actual_refresh_rate =
> + pixel_clock_per_line * FIXED_POINT_PRECISION / adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal;
> + desired_refresh_rate = drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode);
> + actual_pixel_rate = actual_refresh_rate * adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal;
> + actual_pixel_rate =
> + (actual_pixel_rate * adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal) / FIXED_POINT_PRECISION;
I am still not clear about this part. isnt actual_pixel_rate simply
adjusted_mode->crtc_clock?
> +
> + multiplier_m = 1001;
> + multiplier_n = 1000;
> +
> + crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n =
> + ((desired_refresh_rate * adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal * multiplier_n) / multiplier_m);
> + crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n *= multiplier_n;
This seems wrong: As per bspec:68925 this should be just:
crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n = ((desired_refresh_rate *
adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal * multiplier_n);
> + vtotal = (actual_pixel_rate * multiplier_n) / crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n;
> + adjusted_pixel_rate = actual_pixel_rate * multiplier_m;
> + crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_m = do_div(adjusted_pixel_rate, crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n);
> +
> + return vtotal;
> +}
> +
> void
> intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> @@ -116,6 +172,7 @@ intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct intel_connector *connector =
> to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> + bool is_edp = intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp);
> struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->base.display_info;
> int vmin, vmax;
> @@ -160,18 +217,10 @@ intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> crtc_state->vrr.flipline = crtc_state->vrr.vmin + 1;
>
> /*
> - * For XE_LPD+, we use guardband and pipeline override
> - * is deprecated.
> + * When panel is VRR capable and userspace has
> + * not enabled adaptive sync mode then Fixed Average
> + * Vtotal mode should be enabled.
> */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13) {
> - crtc_state->vrr.guardband =
> - crtc_state->vrr.vmin + 1 - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> - } else {
> - crtc_state->vrr.pipeline_full =
> - min(255, crtc_state->vrr.vmin - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start -
> - crtc_state->framestart_delay - 1);
> - }
> -
> if (crtc_state->uapi.vrr_enabled) {
> crtc_state->vrr.enable = true;
> crtc_state->mode_flags |= I915_MODE_FLAG_VRR;
> @@ -183,6 +232,25 @@ intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal -
> crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.vsync_end);
> }
> + } else if (is_cmrr_frac_required(crtc_state, is_edp)) {
> + crtc_state->vrr.enable = true;
I think it will be better to add crtc_state->cmrr.enable = true; here
instead of a separate patch.
> + crtc_state->vrr.vmax = cmrr_get_vtotal(crtc_state);
> + crtc_state->vrr.vmin = crtc_state->vrr.vmax;
> + crtc_state->vrr.flipline = crtc_state->vrr.vmin;
> + crtc_state->mode_flags |= I915_MODE_FLAG_VRR;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For XE_LPD+, we use guardband and pipeline override
> + * is deprecated.
> + */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13) {
> + crtc_state->vrr.guardband =
> + crtc_state->vrr.vmin + 1 - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> + } else {
> + crtc_state->vrr.pipeline_full =
> + min(255, crtc_state->vrr.vmin - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start -
> + crtc_state->framestart_delay - 1);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -323,7 +391,14 @@ void intel_vrr_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> trans_vrr_ctl = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> TRANS_VRR_CTL(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
>
> - crtc_state->vrr.enable = trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE;
> + if (HAS_CMRR(dev_priv)) {
> + crtc_state->cmrr.enable = (trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE) &&
> + (trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE);
> + crtc_state->vrr.enable = trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE &&
> + !(trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE);
Since vrr.enable and cmrr.enable are not mutually exclusive, this simple
can be:
crtc_state->vrr.enable = trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE;
if (HAS_CMRR(dev_priv)
crtc_state->cmrr.enable = trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE;
Regards,
Ankit
> + } else {
> + crtc_state->vrr.enable = trans_vrr_ctl & VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE;
> + }
>
> if (crtc_state->cmrr.enable) {
> crtc_state->cmrr.cmrr_n =
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 10:24 [PATCH v9 0/8] Implement CMRR Support Mitul Golani
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] drm/i915: Define and compute Transcoder CMRR registers Mitul Golani
2024-05-27 10:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-27 10:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] drm/i915: Update trans_vrr_ctl flag when cmrr is computed Mitul Golani
2024-05-28 9:06 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] drm/i915: Compute CMRR and calculate vtotal Mitul Golani
2024-05-28 9:34 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-05-29 11:43 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] Add refresh rate divider to struct representing AS SDP Mitul Golani
2024-05-28 9:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] drm/i915/display: Add support for pack and unpack Mitul Golani
2024-05-28 9:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] drm/i915/display: Compute Adaptive sync SDP params Mitul Golani
2024-05-28 9:39 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] drm/i915/display: Compute vrr vsync params Mitul Golani
2024-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] drm/i915/display: Compute cmrr.enable flag Mitul Golani
2024-05-24 11:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Implement CMRR Support (rev9) Patchwork
2024-05-24 11:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-05-24 11:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-05-27 10:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-05-27 15:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d3e0a8c-7bd8-426c-bcac-93ad38af2227@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox