Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Workaround updates

[Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>]

On 26/12/2019 19:39, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 09:31:29PM +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>> On 24/12/2019 03:20, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> A quick drive-by update for some workarounds I noticed that were
>>> added/extended to additional platforms.
>>>
>>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Matt Roper (3):
>>>     drm/i915: Extend WaDisableDARBFClkGating to icl,ehl,tgl
>>>     drm/i915: Add Wa_1408615072 and Wa_1407596294 to icl,ehl
>>>     drm/i915/tgl: Extend Wa_1408615072 to tgl
>>>
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  7 +++++--
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              |  7 ++++++-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>    3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> What do you think about Wa_1407352427 for ICL?
>>
>> Sounds like it could fix some 3D hangs too.
> Yeah, looks like we need to add that one for ICL/EHL.  I'll send a
> separate patch for that one since this series is ready to merge once CI
> results come back.  Thanks for pointing it out!
>
>
> Matt


Thanks for taking that on.


One question though about those workarounds, we probably need to have 
them applied to older kernels with ICL support right?

Should they be Cc stable?


Cheers,


-Lionel


>
>>
>> -Lionel
>>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx