* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
@ 2020-10-12 8:37 Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-12 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lee, Shawn C @ 2020-10-12 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma; +Cc: Nikula, Jani
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:19AM, Shankar Uma wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
>> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if
>> available
>>
>> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the ACPI
>> OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>
>Looks Good to me.
>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>
>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> goto out_vdd_off;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
>> + intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
>> +
Customer report DUT still get EDID from eDP panel instead of mailbox #5.
After some investigations, this change can retrieve EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
But driver still used panel's EDID to enable eDP display. This is because of drm_get_edid()
was executed after intel_opregion_edid_override(). drm_get_edid() return panel's EDID
and overwrite mailbox #5's.
We try to move drm_get_edid() before intel_opregion_edid_override().
The test result is positive, mailbox #5 EDID will substitute for panel's.
It seems we may need some additional change for this patch. Thanks!
Best regards,
Shawn
>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
>> if (edid) {
>> --
>> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-10-12 8:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available Lee, Shawn C
@ 2020-10-12 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-13 9:56 ` Lee, Shawn C
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-10-12 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 20200828061941.17051-2-jani.nikula@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:19AM, Shankar Uma wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
>>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
>>> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if
>>> available
>>>
>>> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the ACPI
>>> OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>>
>>Looks Good to me.
>>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>
>>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>>> *intel_dp,
>>> goto out_vdd_off;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
>>> +intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
>>> +
>
> Customer report DUT still get EDID from eDP panel instead of mailbox #5.
> After some investigations, this change can retrieve EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
> But driver still used panel's EDID to enable eDP display. This is because of drm_get_edid()
> was executed after intel_opregion_edid_override(). drm_get_edid() return panel's EDID
> and overwrite mailbox #5's.
In recent kernels, drm_get_edid() respects EDID override, and calling
drm_get_edid() will return the override EDID from mailbox #5 instead of
retrieving the actual EDID.
Check the kernel version they're using and the drm_get_edid()
implementation.
BR,
Jani.
>
> We try to move drm_get_edid() before intel_opregion_edid_override().
> The test result is positive, mailbox #5 EDID will substitute for panel's.
> It seems we may need some additional change for this patch. Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Shawn
>
>>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>>> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
>>> if (edid) {
>>> --
>>> 2.20.1
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-10-12 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2020-10-13 9:56 ` Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-13 11:03 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lee, Shawn C @ 2020-10-13 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:09 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:19AM, Shankar Uma wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
>>>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
>>>> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for
>>>> eDP, if available
>>>>
>>>> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in
>>>> the ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>>>
>>>Looks Good to me.
>>>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>
>>>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct
>>>> intel_dp *intel_dp, goto out_vdd_off; }
>>>>
>>>> +/* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
>>>> +intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
>>>> +
>>
>> Customer report DUT still get EDID from eDP panel instead of mailbox #5.
>> After some investigations, this change can retrieve EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
>> But driver still used panel's EDID to enable eDP display. This is
>> because of drm_get_edid() was executed after
>> intel_opregion_edid_override(). drm_get_edid() return panel's EDID and overwrite mailbox #5's.
>
>In recent kernels, drm_get_edid() respects EDID override, and calling
>drm_get_edid() will return the override EDID from mailbox #5 instead of retrieving the actual EDID.
>
>Check the kernel version they're using and the drm_get_edid() implementation.
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
Just confirm customer is using kernel v5.8. Seems drm_edid.c already include
the change for override_edid.
BTW. override_edid should be "true" and used to over EDID in intel_opregion_edid_override() in patch 1. Right?
But it is "false" in the patch 1.
+ connector->override_edid = false;
Best regards,
Shawn
>
>>
>> We try to move drm_get_edid() before intel_opregion_edid_override().
>> The test result is positive, mailbox #5 EDID will substitute for panel's.
>> It seems we may need some additional change for this patch. Thanks!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Shawn
>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>>>> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc); if (edid) {
>>>> --
>>>> 2.20.1
>
>--
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-10-13 9:56 ` Lee, Shawn C
@ 2020-10-13 11:03 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-14 14:11 ` Lee, Shawn C
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-10-13 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 20200828061941.17051-2-jani.nikula@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:09 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:19AM, Shankar Uma wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
>>>>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
>>>>> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for
>>>>> eDP, if available
>>>>>
>>>>> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in
>>>>> the ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>>>>
>>>>Looks Good to me.
>>>>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct
>>>>> intel_dp *intel_dp, goto out_vdd_off; }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
>>>>> +intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
>>>>> +
>>>
>>> Customer report DUT still get EDID from eDP panel instead of mailbox #5.
>>> After some investigations, this change can retrieve EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
>>> But driver still used panel's EDID to enable eDP display. This is
>>> because of drm_get_edid() was executed after
>>> intel_opregion_edid_override(). drm_get_edid() return panel's EDID and overwrite mailbox #5's.
>>
>>In recent kernels, drm_get_edid() respects EDID override, and calling
>>drm_get_edid() will return the override EDID from mailbox #5 instead of retrieving the actual EDID.
>>
>>Check the kernel version they're using and the drm_get_edid() implementation.
>>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>>
>
> Just confirm customer is using kernel v5.8. Seems drm_edid.c already include
> the change for override_edid.
>
> BTW. override_edid should be "true" and used to over EDID in intel_opregion_edid_override() in patch 1. Right?
> But it is "false" in the patch 1.
>
> +connector->override_edid = false;
>
+
+ connector->override_edid = false;
+ ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
+ if (ret)
+ return;
+
+ connector->override_edid = true;
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Using OpRegion EDID for [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
+ connector->base.id, connector->name);
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831083657.15600-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
BR,
Jani.
> Best regards,
> Shawn
>
>>
>>>
>>> We try to move drm_get_edid() before intel_opregion_edid_override().
>>> The test result is positive, mailbox #5 EDID will substitute for panel's.
>>> It seems we may need some additional change for this patch. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>>>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>>>>> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc); if (edid) {
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.20.1
>>
>>--
>>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>>_______________________________________________
>>Intel-gfx mailing list
>>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-10-13 11:03 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2020-10-14 14:11 ` Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-14 14:14 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lee, Shawn C @ 2020-10-14 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikula, Jani, 20200828061941.17051-2-jani.nikula@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:05 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:09 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:19AM, Shankar Uma wrote:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
>>>>>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
>>>>>> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for
>>>>>> eDP, if available
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in
>>>>>> the ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks Good to me.
>>>>>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct
>>>>>> intel_dp *intel_dp, goto out_vdd_off; }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
>>>>>> +intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
>>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Customer report DUT still get EDID from eDP panel instead of mailbox #5.
>>>> After some investigations, this change can retrieve EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
>>>> But driver still used panel's EDID to enable eDP display. This is
>>>> because of drm_get_edid() was executed after
>>>> intel_opregion_edid_override(). drm_get_edid() return panel's EDID and overwrite mailbox #5's.
>>>
>>>In recent kernels, drm_get_edid() respects EDID override, and calling
>>>drm_get_edid() will return the override EDID from mailbox #5 instead of retrieving the actual EDID.
>>>
>>>Check the kernel version they're using and the drm_get_edid() implementation.
>>>
>>>BR,
>>>Jani.
>>>
>>
>> Just confirm customer is using kernel v5.8. Seems drm_edid.c already
>> include the change for override_edid.
>>
>> BTW. override_edid should be "true" and used to over EDID in intel_opregion_edid_override() in patch 1. Right?
>> But it is "false" in the patch 1.
>>
>> +connector->override_edid = false;
>>
>
>
>+
>+ connector->override_edid = false;
>+ ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
>+ if (ret)
>+ return;
>+
>+ connector->override_edid = true;
>+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Using OpRegion EDID for [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>+ connector->base.id, connector->name);
>
>
>http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831083657.15600-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
I think I got the problem now. The patch you attached is correct.
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831083657.15600-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
But customer refer to below patch without "override_edid = true".
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/388309/?series=81121&rev=1
This is why they can't get EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
Best regards,
Shawn
>
>
>> Best regards,
>> Shawn
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We try to move drm_get_edid() before intel_opregion_edid_override().
>>>> The test result is positive, mailbox #5 EDID will substitute for panel's.
>>>> It seems we may need some additional change for this patch. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Shawn
>>>>
>>>>>> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>>>>>> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc); if (edid) {
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.20.1
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>--
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-10-14 14:11 ` Lee, Shawn C
@ 2020-10-14 14:14 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-10-14 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee, Shawn C, 20200828061941.17051-2-jani.nikula@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Shankar, Uma
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> I think I got the problem now. The patch you attached is correct.
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831083657.15600-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
>
> But customer refer to below patch without "override_edid = true".
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/388309/?series=81121&rev=1
>
> This is why they can't get EDID from mailbox #5 properly.
Yeah, there was that bug in v1 of the patch.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID
@ 2020-08-28 6:19 Jani Nikula
2020-08-28 6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-08-28 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula
The ACPI OpRegion Mailbox #5 ASLE extension may contain an EDID to be
used for the embedded display. Add support for using it via the EDID
override mechanism.
Note that the override EDID may be later reset or changed via debugfs,
as usual.
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h | 8 ++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
index de995362f428..13485969fafa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
@@ -196,6 +196,8 @@ struct opregion_asle_ext {
#define ASLE_IUER_WINDOWS_BTN (1 << 1)
#define ASLE_IUER_POWER_BTN (1 << 0)
+#define ASLE_PHED_EDID_VALID_MASK 0x3
+
/* Software System Control Interrupt (SWSCI) */
#define SWSCI_SCIC_INDICATOR (1 << 0)
#define SWSCI_SCIC_MAIN_FUNCTION_SHIFT 1
@@ -909,8 +911,10 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
opregion->asle->ardy = ASLE_ARDY_NOT_READY;
}
- if (mboxes & MBOX_ASLE_EXT)
+ if (mboxes & MBOX_ASLE_EXT) {
drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "ASLE extension supported\n");
+ opregion->asle_ext = base + OPREGION_ASLE_EXT_OFFSET;
+ }
if (intel_load_vbt_firmware(dev_priv) == 0)
goto out;
@@ -1041,6 +1045,45 @@ intel_opregion_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return ret - 1;
}
+void intel_opregion_edid_override(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
+{
+ struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->dev);
+ struct intel_opregion *opregion = &i915->opregion;
+ const void *in_edid;
+ const struct edid *edid;
+ int len, ret;
+
+ if (!opregion->asle_ext)
+ return;
+
+ in_edid = opregion->asle_ext->bddc;
+
+ /* Validity corresponds to number of 128-byte blocks */
+ len = (opregion->asle_ext->phed & ASLE_PHED_EDID_VALID_MASK) * 128;
+ if (!len || !memchr_inv(in_edid, 0, len))
+ return;
+
+ edid = in_edid;
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: Might also check drm_edid_is_valid(edid) here but that
+ * requires mutable edid.
+ */
+ if (len < EDID_LENGTH * (1 + edid->extensions)) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Invalid EDID in ACPI OpRegion (Mailbox #5)\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ connector->override_edid = false;
+ ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
+ if (ret)
+ return;
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Using OpRegion EDID for [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
+ connector->base.id, connector->name);
+}
+
void intel_opregion_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_opregion *opregion = &i915->opregion;
@@ -1131,6 +1174,7 @@ void intel_opregion_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
opregion->acpi = NULL;
opregion->swsci = NULL;
opregion->asle = NULL;
+ opregion->asle_ext = NULL;
opregion->vbt = NULL;
opregion->lid_state = NULL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
index 4aa68ffbd30e..b407a0744c40 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
@@ -29,12 +29,14 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
struct drm_i915_private;
+struct intel_connector;
struct intel_encoder;
struct opregion_header;
struct opregion_acpi;
struct opregion_swsci;
struct opregion_asle;
+struct opregion_asle_ext;
struct intel_opregion {
struct opregion_header *header;
@@ -43,6 +45,7 @@ struct intel_opregion {
u32 swsci_gbda_sub_functions;
u32 swsci_sbcb_sub_functions;
struct opregion_asle *asle;
+ struct opregion_asle_ext *asle_ext;
void *rvda;
void *vbt_firmware;
const void *vbt;
@@ -71,6 +74,7 @@ int intel_opregion_notify_encoder(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
int intel_opregion_notify_adapter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
pci_power_t state);
int intel_opregion_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void intel_opregion_edid_override(struct intel_connector *connector);
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI*/
@@ -117,6 +121,10 @@ static inline int intel_opregion_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev)
return -ENODEV;
}
+void intel_opregion_edid_override(struct intel_connector *connector)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
#endif
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-08-28 6:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID Jani Nikula
@ 2020-08-28 6:19 ` Jani Nikula
2020-08-31 7:59 ` Shankar, Uma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-08-28 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula
If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the
ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
goto out_vdd_off;
}
+ /* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
+ intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
+
mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
if (edid) {
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available
2020-08-28 6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available Jani Nikula
@ 2020-08-31 7:59 ` Shankar, Uma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shankar, Uma @ 2020-08-31 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; +Cc: Nikula, Jani
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 11:50 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma
> <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if
> available
>
> If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the ACPI
> OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
Looks Good to me.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index c57ac83bf563..d1307be196a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -8114,6 +8114,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> goto out_vdd_off;
> }
>
> + /* Set up override EDID, if any, from ACPI OpRegion */
> + intel_opregion_edid_override(intel_connector);
> +
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
> if (edid) {
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-14 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-12 8:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-12 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-13 9:56 ` Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-13 11:03 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-14 14:11 ` Lee, Shawn C
2020-10-14 14:14 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-28 6:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID Jani Nikula
2020-08-28 6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: use opregion mailbox #5 EDID for eDP, if available Jani Nikula
2020-08-31 7:59 ` Shankar, Uma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox