From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Restructure probe to handle multi-tile platforms
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:12:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee8pxgvs.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211008215635.2026385-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, 08 Oct 2021, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On a multi-tile platform, each tile has its own registers + GGTT space,
> and BAR 0 is extended to cover all of them. Upcoming patches will start
> exposing the tiles as multiple GTs within a single PCI device. In
> preparation for supporting such setups, restructure the driver's probe
> code a bit.
>
> Only the primary/root tile is initialized for now; the other tiles will
> be detected and plugged in by future patches once the necessary
> infrastructure is in place to handle them.
>
> Original-author: Abdiel Janulgue
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c | 9 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 5 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 20 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 12 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 3 +-
> 7 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> index 1cb1948ac959..f4bea1f1de77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> @@ -900,6 +900,51 @@ u32 intel_gt_read_register_fw(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg)
> return intel_uncore_read_fw(gt->uncore, reg);
> }
>
> +static int
> +tile_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int id, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + intel_uncore_init_early(gt->uncore, gt->i915);
> +
> + ret = intel_uncore_setup_mmio(gt->uncore, phys_addr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + gt->phys_addr = phys_addr;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tile_cleanup(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + intel_uncore_cleanup_mmio(gt->uncore);
> +}
> +
> +int intel_probe_gts(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> + unsigned int mmio_bar;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mmio_bar = GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 2 ? 1 : 0;
> + phys_addr = pci_resource_start(pdev, mmio_bar);
> +
> + /* We always have at least one primary GT on any device */
> + ret = tile_setup(&i915->gt, 0, phys_addr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* TODO: add more tiles */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_gts_release(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + tile_cleanup(&i915->gt);
> +}
Please call the functions intel_gt_*.
BR,
Jani.
> +
> void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info,
> struct drm_printer *p)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> index 74e771871a9b..f4f35a70cbe4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static inline bool intel_gt_needs_read_steering(struct intel_gt *gt,
>
> u32 intel_gt_read_register_fw(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg);
>
> +int intel_probe_gts(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +void intel_gts_release(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
> void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info,
> struct drm_printer *p);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> index 524eaf678790..76f498edb0d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,14 @@ static const struct intel_wakeref_ops wf_ops = {
>
> void intel_gt_pm_init_early(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> - intel_wakeref_init(>->wakeref, gt->uncore->rpm, &wf_ops);
> + /*
> + * We access the runtime_pm structure via gt->i915 here rather than
> + * gt->uncore as we do elsewhere in the file because gt->uncore is not
> + * yet initialized for all tiles at this point in the driver startup.
> + * runtime_pm is per-device rather than per-tile, so this is still the
> + * correct structure.
> + */
> + intel_wakeref_init(>->wakeref, >->i915->runtime_pm, &wf_ops);
> seqcount_mutex_init(>->stats.lock, >->wakeref.mutex);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> index 14216cc471b1..66143316d92e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,11 @@ struct intel_gt {
>
> const struct intel_mmio_range *steering_table[NUM_STEERING_TYPES];
>
> + /*
> + * Base of per-tile GTTMMADR where we can derive the MMIO and the GGTT.
> + */
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> +
> struct intel_gt_info {
> intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 7f96d26c012a..51234fd1349b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -312,8 +312,8 @@ static int i915_driver_early_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_device_info_subplatform_init(dev_priv);
> intel_step_init(dev_priv);
>
> + /* All tiles share a single mmio_debug */
> intel_uncore_mmio_debug_init_early(&dev_priv->mmio_debug);
> - intel_uncore_init_early(&dev_priv->uncore, dev_priv);
>
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->gpu_error.lock);
> @@ -415,13 +415,9 @@ static int i915_driver_mmio_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = intel_uncore_setup_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto err_bridge;
> -
> ret = intel_uncore_init_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_mmio;
> + return ret;
>
> /* Try to make sure MCHBAR is enabled before poking at it */
> intel_setup_mchbar(dev_priv);
> @@ -439,9 +435,6 @@ static int i915_driver_mmio_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> err_uncore:
> intel_teardown_mchbar(dev_priv);
> intel_uncore_fini_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> -err_mmio:
> - intel_uncore_cleanup_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> -err_bridge:
> pci_dev_put(dev_priv->bridge_dev);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -455,7 +448,6 @@ static void i915_driver_mmio_release(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> intel_teardown_mchbar(dev_priv);
> intel_uncore_fini_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> - intel_uncore_cleanup_mmio(&dev_priv->uncore);
> pci_dev_put(dev_priv->bridge_dev);
> }
>
> @@ -844,10 +836,14 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>
> intel_vgpu_detect(i915);
>
> - ret = i915_driver_mmio_probe(i915);
> + ret = intel_probe_gts(i915);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_runtime_pm_put;
>
> + ret = i915_driver_mmio_probe(i915);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_tiles_cleanup;
> +
> ret = i915_driver_hw_probe(i915);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_cleanup_mmio;
> @@ -904,6 +900,8 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> i915_ggtt_driver_late_release(i915);
> out_cleanup_mmio:
> i915_driver_mmio_release(i915);
> +out_tiles_cleanup:
> + intel_gts_release(i915);
> out_runtime_pm_put:
> enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&i915->runtime_pm);
> i915_driver_late_release(i915);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index a308e86c9d9f..8a0a0676d67a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -2020,14 +2020,11 @@ static int i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> +int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
> - int mmio_bar;
> int mmio_size;
>
> - mmio_bar = GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 2 ? 1 : 0;
> /*
> * Before gen4, the registers and the GTT are behind different BARs.
> * However, from gen4 onwards, the registers and the GTT are shared
> @@ -2044,7 +2041,7 @@ int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> else
> mmio_size = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
>
> - uncore->regs = pci_iomap(pdev, mmio_bar, mmio_size);
> + uncore->regs = ioremap(phys_addr, mmio_size);
> if (uncore->regs == NULL) {
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "failed to map registers\n");
> return -EIO;
> @@ -2055,9 +2052,8 @@ int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>
> void intel_uncore_cleanup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(uncore->i915->drm.dev);
> -
> - pci_iounmap(pdev, uncore->regs);
> + if (uncore->regs)
> + iounmap(uncore->regs);
> }
>
> void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> index d1d17b04e29f..83a455aa8374 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
> #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> #include "i915_reg.h"
>
> @@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ void
> intel_uncore_mmio_debug_init_early(struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug);
> void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> -int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore);
> +int intel_uncore_setup_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore, phys_addr_t phys_addr);
> int intel_uncore_init_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore);
> void intel_uncore_prune_engine_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> struct intel_gt *gt);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 21:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] i915: Initial multi-tile support Matt Roper
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: rework some irq functions to take intel_gt as argument Matt Roper
2021-10-27 6:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-28 14:13 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: split general MMIO setup from per-GT uncore init Matt Roper
2021-10-27 6:26 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-28 14:17 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Restructure probe to handle multi-tile platforms Matt Roper
2021-10-13 12:12 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-10-27 6:57 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-27 7:58 ` Jani Nikula
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Store backpointer to GT in uncore Matt Roper
2021-10-28 14:26 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Prepare for multiple gts Matt Roper
2021-10-27 7:01 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Initial support for per-tile uncore Matt Roper
2021-10-28 15:41 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/xehp: Determine which tile raised an interrupt Matt Roper
2021-10-08 23:48 ` Matt Roper
2021-10-13 0:55 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-27 7:13 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/xehp: Make IRQ reset and postinstall multi-tile aware Matt Roper
2021-10-28 16:30 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-28 23:20 ` Matt Roper
2021-10-29 0:16 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/guc: Update CT debug macro for multi-tile Matt Roper
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Release per-gt resources allocated Matt Roper
2021-10-28 16:33 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Initialize multi-tiles Matt Roper
2021-10-08 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Matt Roper
2021-10-11 7:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-12 23:11 ` Andi Shyti
2021-10-08 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Initial multi-tile support Patchwork
2021-10-08 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-09 0:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Initial multi-tile support (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-09 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-09 2:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915: Initial multi-tile support Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee8pxgvs.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox