From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:36:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7755gfi.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405173410.11436-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 05 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently get_lvds_fp_timing() still returns a pointer to the original
> data block rather than our copy. Let's convert the data pointer offsets
> to be relative to the data block rather than the whole BDB. With that
> we can make get_lvds_fp_timing() return a pointer to the copy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 2e9f639d092e..000544280c35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,29 @@ static const struct {
> .min_size = sizeof(struct bdb_generic_dtd), },
> };
>
> +/* make the data table offsets relative to the data block */
> +static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
> +{
> + struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs = ptrs_block;
> + u32 offset;
> + int i;
> +
> + offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||
> + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset < offset ||
> + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset < offset)
> + return false;
> +
> + ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset -= offset;
> + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset -= offset;
> + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset -= offset;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void
> init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id,
> @@ -217,6 +240,13 @@ init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found BDB block %d (size %zu, min size %zu)\n",
> section_id, block_size, min_size);
>
> + if (section_id == BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS &&
> + !fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, entry->data + 3)) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "VBT has malformed LFP data table pointers\n");
> + kfree(entry);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> list_add_tail(&entry->node, &i915->vbt.bdb_blocks);
> }
>
> @@ -312,22 +342,19 @@ get_lvds_dvo_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *lvds_lfp_data,
> * this function may return NULL if the corresponding entry is invalid
> */
> static const struct lvds_fp_timing *
> -get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_header *bdb,
> - const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> +get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs,
> int index)
> {
> - size_t data_ofs = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> u16 data_size = ((const u16 *)data)[-1]; /* stored in header */
> size_t ofs;
>
> if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(ptrs->ptr))
> return NULL;
> ofs = ptrs->ptr[index].fp_timing.offset;
> - if (ofs < data_ofs ||
> - ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_ofs + data_size)
> + if (ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_size)
> return NULL;
> - return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)bdb + ofs);
> + return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)data + ofs);
> }
>
> /* Parse general panel options */
> @@ -426,7 +453,7 @@ parse_lfp_panel_dtd(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> "Found panel mode in BIOS VBT legacy lfp table: " DRM_MODE_FMT "\n",
> DRM_MODE_ARG(panel_fixed_mode));
>
> - fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(bdb, lvds_lfp_data,
> + fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(lvds_lfp_data,
> lvds_lfp_data_ptrs,
> panel_type);
> if (fp_timing) {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 17:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/22] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the cached BDB version Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:06 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:36 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/22] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:21 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/22] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 12:24 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 16:53 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 18:18 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-12 8:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/22] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/22] drm/i915/bios: Assume panel_type==0 if the VBT has bogus data Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:11 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/22] drm/i915/bios: Split parse_driver_features() into two parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/22] drm/i915/bios: Split VBT parsing to global vs. panel specific parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/22] drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/22] drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/22] drm/i915/bios: Do panel specific VBT parsing later Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/22] drm/i915/bios: Extract get_panel_type() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:26 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/bios: Refactor panel_type code Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/22] drm/i915/bios: Determine panel type via PNPID match Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/22] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:56 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/22] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:01 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/22] drm/edid: Extract drm_edid_decode_mfg_id() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/22] drm/i915/bios: Dump PNPID and panel name Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 22:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Patchwork
2022-04-05 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev6) Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 8:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7755gfi.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox