From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/22] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:29:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yk7ZOul4XBowgzVv@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6cx5bf4.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 03:24:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Modern VBTs no longer contain the LFP data table pointers
> > block (41). We are expecting to have one in order to be able
> > to parse the LFP data block (42), so let's make one up.
>
> Bspec says, "These fields are used by the BMP tool to locate the tables
> in block 42 and present in its GUI."
>
> Sounds like an alternative would be to always just parse block 42
> directly instead of validating/generating block 41 for that?
We can't since the fp_timing table entries don't have a fixed size.
Well, maybe we could for some modern VBTs where we perhaps can assume
a fixed size. But then we'd have two totally different ways to parse
block 42 which I don't like.
>
> Maybe it's easier to go with what you've done here now, and reconsider
> in the future. *shrug*.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> > Since the fp_timing table has variable size we must somehow
> > determine its size. Rather than just hardcode it we look for
> > the terminator bytes (0xffff) to figure out where each table
> > entry starts. dvo_timing, panel_pnp_id, and panel_name are
> > expected to have fixed size.
> >
> > This has been observed on various machines, eg. TGL with BDB
> > version 240, CML with BDB version 231, etc. The most recent
> > VBT I've observed that still had block 41 had BDB version
> > 228. So presumably the cutoff (if an exact cutoff even exists)
> > is somewhere around BDB version 229-231.
> >
> > v2: kfree the thing we allocated, not the thing+3 bytes
> > v3: Do the debugprint only if we found the LFP data block
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index 8b118c54314d..d32091dad1b0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -310,16 +310,146 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
> > return validate_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, ptrs);
> > }
> >
> > +static const void *find_fp_timing_terminator(const u8 *data, int size)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!data)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < size - 1; i++) {
> > + if (data[i] == 0xff && data[i+1] == 0xff)
> > + return &data[i];
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int make_lfp_data_ptr(struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *table,
> > + int table_size, int total_size)
> > +{
> > + if (total_size < table_size)
> > + return total_size;
> > +
> > + table->table_size = table_size;
> > + table->offset = total_size - table_size;
> > +
> > + return total_size - table_size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void next_lfp_data_ptr(struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *next,
> > + const struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *prev,
> > + int size)
> > +{
> > + next->table_size = prev->table_size;
> > + next->offset = prev->offset + size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void *generate_lfp_data_ptrs(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + const void *bdb)
> > +{
> > + int i, size, table_size, block_size, offset;
> > + const void *t0, *t1, *block;
> > + struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs;
> > + void *ptrs_block;
> > +
> > + block = find_raw_section(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> > + if (!block)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Generating LFP data table pointers\n");
> > +
> > + block_size = get_blocksize(block);
> > +
> > + size = block_size;
> > + t0 = find_fp_timing_terminator(block, size);
> > +
> > + size -= t0 - block - 2;
> > + t1 = find_fp_timing_terminator(t0 + 2, size);
> > +
> > + if (!t0 || !t1)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + size = t1 - t0;
> > + if (size * 16 > block_size)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + ptrs_block = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptrs) + 3, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ptrs_block)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + *(u8 *)(ptrs_block + 0) = BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS;
> > + *(u16 *)(ptrs_block + 1) = sizeof(*ptrs);
> > + ptrs = ptrs_block + 3;
> > +
> > + table_size = sizeof(struct lvds_pnp_id);
> > + size = make_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[0].panel_pnp_id, table_size, size);
> > +
> > + table_size = sizeof(struct lvds_dvo_timing);
> > + size = make_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[0].dvo_timing, table_size, size);
> > +
> > + table_size = t0 - block + 2;
> > + size = make_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[0].fp_timing, table_size, size);
> > +
> > + if (ptrs->ptr[0].fp_timing.table_size)
> > + ptrs->lvds_entries++;
> > + if (ptrs->ptr[0].dvo_timing.table_size)
> > + ptrs->lvds_entries++;
> > + if (ptrs->ptr[0].panel_pnp_id.table_size)
> > + ptrs->lvds_entries++;
> > +
> > + if (size != 0 || ptrs->lvds_entries != 3) {
> > + kfree(ptrs);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + size = t1 - t0;
> > + for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
> > + next_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing, &ptrs->ptr[i-1].fp_timing, size);
> > + next_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing, &ptrs->ptr[i-1].dvo_timing, size);
> > + next_lfp_data_ptr(&ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id, &ptrs->ptr[i-1].panel_pnp_id, size);
> > + }
> > +
> > + size = t1 - t0;
> > + table_size = sizeof(struct lvds_lfp_panel_name);
> > +
> > + if (16 * (size + table_size) <= block_size) {
> > + ptrs->panel_name.table_size = table_size;
> > + ptrs->panel_name.offset = size * 16;
> > + }
> > +
> > + offset = block - bdb;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> > + ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset += offset;
> > + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset += offset;
> > + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset += offset;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ptrs->panel_name.table_size)
> > + ptrs->panel_name.offset += offset;
> > +
> > + return ptrs_block;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id,
> > size_t min_size)
> > {
> > struct bdb_block_entry *entry;
> > + void *temp_block = NULL;
> > const void *block;
> > size_t block_size;
> >
> > block = find_raw_section(bdb, section_id);
> > +
> > + /* Modern VBTs lack the LFP data table pointers block, make one up */
> > + if (!block && section_id == BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS) {
> > + temp_block = generate_lfp_data_ptrs(i915, bdb);
> > + if (temp_block)
> > + block = temp_block + 3;
> > + }
> > if (!block)
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -330,12 +460,16 @@ init_bdb_block(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >
> > entry = kzalloc(struct_size(entry, data, max(min_size, block_size) + 3),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!entry)
> > + if (!entry) {
> > + kfree(temp_block);
> > return;
> > + }
> >
> > entry->section_id = section_id;
> > memcpy(entry->data, block - 3, block_size + 3);
> >
> > + kfree(temp_block);
> > +
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found BDB block %d (size %zu, min size %zu)\n",
> > section_id, block_size, min_size);
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 17:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/22] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the cached BDB version Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:06 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:36 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/22] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:21 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/22] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 12:24 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:29 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-04-07 16:53 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 18:18 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-12 8:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/22] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/22] drm/i915/bios: Assume panel_type==0 if the VBT has bogus data Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:11 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/22] drm/i915/bios: Split parse_driver_features() into two parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/22] drm/i915/bios: Split VBT parsing to global vs. panel specific parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/22] drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/22] drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/22] drm/i915/bios: Do panel specific VBT parsing later Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/22] drm/i915/bios: Extract get_panel_type() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:26 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/bios: Refactor panel_type code Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/22] drm/i915/bios: Determine panel type via PNPID match Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/22] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:56 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/22] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:01 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/22] drm/edid: Extract drm_edid_decode_mfg_id() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/22] drm/i915/bios: Dump PNPID and panel name Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 22:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Patchwork
2022-04-05 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev6) Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 8:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yk7ZOul4XBowgzVv@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox