From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/bios: Refactor panel_type code
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:13:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlBDBUiQf5+snxh1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875ynk4wdv.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 08:49:00PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Make the panel type code a bit more abstract along the
> > lines of the source of the panel type. For the moment
> > we have three classes: OpRegion, VBT, fallback.
> > Well introduce another one shortly.
> >
> > We can now also print out all the different panel types,
> > and indicate which one we ultimately selected. Could help
> > with debugging.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index 26839263abf0..feef5aa97398 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -606,25 +606,46 @@ static int vbt_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > return lvds_options->panel_type;
> > }
> >
> > +enum panel_type {
> > + PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION,
> > + PANEL_TYPE_VBT,
> > + PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > + struct {
> > + const char *name;
> > + int panel_type;
> > + } panel_types[] = {
> > + [PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION] = { .name = "OpRegion", .panel_type = -1, },
> > + [PANEL_TYPE_VBT] = { .name = "VBT", .panel_type = -1, },
> > + [PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK] = { .name = "fallback", .panel_type = 0, },
> > + };
> > + int i;
> >
> > - ret = intel_opregion_get_panel_type(i915);
> > - if (ret >= 0) {
> > - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, ret > 0xf);
> > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Panel type: %d (OpRegion)\n", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION].panel_type = intel_opregion_get_panel_type(i915);
> > + panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type = vbt_panel_type(i915);
>
> I'd probably add a function pointer in the array, to be able to call
> these nicely in the loop. Needs a static wrapper function for
> intel_opregion_get_panel_type() in the follow-up to eat the edid
> parameter, but I think it's worth it.
Sure.
>
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(panel_types); i++) {
> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, panel_types[i].panel_type > 0xf);
>
> I know that's loud, but it's kind of annoying that the out of bounds
> value still goes through here.
>
> >
> > - ret = vbt_panel_type(i915);
> > - if (ret >= 0) {
> > - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, ret > 0xf);
> > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Panel type: %d (VBT)\n", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > + if (panel_types[i].panel_type >= 0)
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Panel type (%s): %d\n",
> > + panel_types[i].name, panel_types[i].panel_type);
> > }
> >
> > - return 0; /* fallback */
> > + if (panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION].panel_type >= 0)
> > + i = PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION;
> > + else if (panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type >= 0)
> > + i = PANEL_TYPE_VBT;
> > + else
> > + i = PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK;
>
> At this stage, we could set this in the loop too, but dunno how
> complicated that gets with the pnpid match rules.
I don't think the PNPID stuff really lends itself well to a loop
since it needs to consider both the VBT and PNPID pane types at
the same time.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Selected panel type (%s): %d\n",
> > + panel_types[i].name, panel_types[i].panel_type);
> > +
> > + return panel_types[i].panel_type;
> > }
> >
> > /* Parse general panel options */
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 17:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/22] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the cached BDB version Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:06 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/22] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 10:36 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/22] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 16:21 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/22] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 12:24 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 16:53 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 18:18 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-12 8:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/22] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/22] drm/i915/bios: Assume panel_type==0 if the VBT has bogus data Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:11 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/22] drm/i915/bios: Split parse_driver_features() into two parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/22] drm/i915/bios: Split VBT parsing to global vs. panel specific parts Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/22] drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/22] drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/22] drm/i915/bios: Do panel specific VBT parsing later Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/22] drm/i915/bios: Extract get_panel_type() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:26 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/bios: Refactor panel_type code Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/22] drm/i915/bios: Determine panel type via PNPID match Ville Syrjala
2022-04-06 19:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/22] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 17:56 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/22] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:01 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/22] drm/edid: Extract drm_edid_decode_mfg_id() Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-05 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/22] drm/i915/bios: Dump PNPID and panel name Ville Syrjala
2022-04-07 18:07 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-08 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-05 22:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching Patchwork
2022-04-05 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-04-05 23:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-06 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling and PNPID->panel_type matching (rev6) Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-07 0:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-07 8:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlBDBUiQf5+snxh1@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox