Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display/dp: Compute VRR state in atomic_check
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:47:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8k5sd2l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022222709.29386-6-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> This forces a complete modeset if vrr drm crtc state goes
> from enabled to disabled and vice versa.
> This patch also computes vrr state variables from the mode timings
> and based on the vrr property set by userspace as well as hardware's
> vrr capability.
>
> v2:
> *Rebase
> v3:
> * Vmin = max (vtotal, vmin) (Manasi)
> v4:
> * set crtc_state->vrr.enable = 0 for disable request
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  7 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h     |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index f41b6f8b5618..f70cc3b2a1a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14213,6 +14213,10 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>  
>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(mst_master_transcoder);
>  
> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(vrr.enable);
> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vtotalmin);
> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vtotalmax);
> +
>  #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X
>  #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I
>  #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL
> @@ -15202,7 +15206,8 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
>  					    new_crtc_state, i) {
> -		if (new_crtc_state->inherited != old_crtc_state->inherited)
> +		if (new_crtc_state->inherited != old_crtc_state->inherited ||
> +		    new_crtc_state->uapi.vrr_enabled != old_crtc_state->uapi.vrr_enabled)

Somehow this feels like a really specific check to add considering the
abstraction level of the function in general.

>  			new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 3794b8f35edc..3185c4ca523d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>  		intel_dp_set_clock(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
> +	intel_vrr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>  	intel_psr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>  	intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config, output_bpp,
>  				     constant_n);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> index 0c8a91fabb64..56114f535f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> @@ -26,3 +26,41 @@ bool intel_is_vrr_capable(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  		info->monitor_range.max_vfreq - info->monitor_range.min_vfreq > 10;
>  }
>  
> +void
> +intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +			 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
> +	struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +	const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->display_info;
> +
> +	if (!intel_is_vrr_capable(connector))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!crtc_state->uapi.vrr_enabled) {
> +		drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,
> +			"VRR disable requested by Userspace\n");

drm_dbg_kms, though is this useful information? Quite a bit of log spam
I'd think.

> +		crtc_state->vrr.enable = false;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	crtc_state->vrr.enable = true;
> +	crtc_state->vrr.vtotalmin =
> +		max_t(u16, adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal,
> +		      DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock * 1000,
> +					adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal *
> +					info->monitor_range.max_vfreq));
> +	crtc_state->vrr.vtotalmax =
> +		max_t(u16, adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal,
> +		      DIV_ROUND_UP(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock * 1000,
> +				   adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal *
> +				   info->monitor_range.min_vfreq));
> +
> +	drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,

drm_dbg_kms

> +		"VRR Config: Enable = %s Vtotal Min = %d Vtotal Max = %d\n",
> +		 yesno(crtc_state->vrr.enable), crtc_state->vrr.vtotalmin,
> +		 crtc_state->vrr.vtotalmax);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> index 755746c7525c..1e6fe8fe92ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> @@ -15,5 +15,7 @@ struct intel_encoder;
>  struct intel_dp;
>  
>  bool intel_is_vrr_capable(struct drm_connector *connector);
> +void intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +			      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_VRR_H__ */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 22:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] VRR/Adaptive Sync enabling in i915 Manasi Navare
2020-10-22 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Add REG_FIELD_PREP to VRR register def Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:13   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:41     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/display/vrr: Create VRR file and add VRR capability check Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:39   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:21     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-02 22:40       ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 16:35         ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-03 19:38           ` Navare, Manasi
2020-11-10 16:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-11-10 18:48     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display/dp: Attach and set drm connector VRR property Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:41   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:46     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 16:37       ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-03 19:37         ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/display/dp: Add VRR crtc state variables Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:41   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:49     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display/dp: Compute VRR state in atomic_check Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:47   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-12-01 22:52     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-02 22:38       ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 16:39         ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-03 19:36           ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/display/dp: Do not enable PSR if VRR is enabled Manasi Navare
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/display/vrr: Configure and enable VRR in modeset enable Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:56   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:56     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 16:40       ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/display/vrr: Send VRR push to flip the frame Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 10:59   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:57     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 19:58       ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/display/vrr: Disable VRR in modeset disable path Manasi Navare
2020-11-10 11:01   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-01 22:34     ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/display/vrr: Set IGNORE_MSA_PAR state in DP Sink Manasi Navare
2020-12-01 22:59   ` Navare, Manasi
2020-12-03 16:49     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-03 19:33       ` Navare, Manasi
2020-10-22 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/display: Add HW state readout for VRR Manasi Navare
2020-10-23 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2020-10-22 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for VRR/Adaptive Sync enabling in i915 Patchwork
2020-10-23 17:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for VRR/Adaptive Sync enabling in i915 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-10-23 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-10-23 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-23 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8k5sd2l.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox