From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Replace bxt_clk_div with struct dpll
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:41:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmn22be4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301173128.6988-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 01 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> bxt_clk_div is basically the same as struct dpll. Just use the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 50 ++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 4a82e630cbec..58e9d5960bc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2080,75 +2080,57 @@ static bool bxt_ddi_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* bxt clock parameters */
> -struct bxt_clk_div {
> - int clock;
> - u32 p1;
> - u32 p2;
> - u32 m2;
> - u32 n;
> -
> - int vco;
> -};
> -
> /* pre-calculated values for DP linkrates */
> -static const struct bxt_clk_div bxt_dp_clk_val[] = {
> - { .clock = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> +static const struct dpll bxt_dp_clk_val[] = {
> + { .dot = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> - { .clock = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac = 0 */ },
> - { .clock = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac = 0 */ },
> - { .clock = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> - { .clock = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x6133333 /* .m2_int = 24, m2_frac = 1258291 */ },
> - { .clock = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> - { .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + { .dot = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> };
>
> static bool
> bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct bxt_clk_div *clk_div)
> + struct dpll *clk_div)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> - struct dpll best_clock;
>
> /* Calculate HDMI div */
> /*
> * FIXME: tie the following calculation into
> * i9xx_crtc_compute_clock
> */
> - if (!bxt_find_best_dpll(crtc_state, &best_clock)) {
> + if (!bxt_find_best_dpll(crtc_state, clk_div)) {
> drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "no PLL dividers found for clock %d pipe %c\n",
> crtc_state->port_clock,
> pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> return false;
> }
>
> - clk_div->p1 = best_clock.p1;
> - clk_div->p2 = best_clock.p2;
> - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, best_clock.m1 != 2);
> - clk_div->n = best_clock.n;
> - clk_div->m2 = best_clock.m2;
> -
> - clk_div->vco = best_clock.vco;
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, clk_div->m1 != 2);
>
> return true;
> }
>
> static void bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct bxt_clk_div *clk_div)
> + struct dpll *clk_div)
> {
> int clock = crtc_state->port_clock;
> int i;
>
> *clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[0];
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_dp_clk_val); ++i) {
> - if (bxt_dp_clk_val[i].clock == clock) {
> + if (bxt_dp_clk_val[i].dot == clock) {
> *clk_div = bxt_dp_clk_val[i];
> break;
> }
> @@ -2158,7 +2140,7 @@ static void bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> }
>
> static bool bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - const struct bxt_clk_div *clk_div)
> + const struct dpll *clk_div)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
> @@ -2230,7 +2212,7 @@ static bool bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> static bool
> bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - struct bxt_clk_div clk_div = {};
> + struct dpll clk_div = {};
>
> bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
>
> @@ -2240,7 +2222,7 @@ bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> static bool
> bxt_ddi_hdmi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - struct bxt_clk_div clk_div = {};
> + struct dpll clk_div = {};
>
> bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 17:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Clean up some dpll stuff Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Nuke skl_wrpll_context_init() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Move a bunch of stuff into rodata from the stack Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Clean up some struct/array initializers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Store the /5 target clock in sturct dpll on vlv/chv Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Remove bxt m2_frac_en Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:19 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Use designated initializers for bxt_dp_clk_val[] Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:20 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Store the m2 divider as a whole in bxt_clk_div Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:36 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-07 18:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Replace bxt_clk_div with struct dpll Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:41 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Replace hand rolled bxt vco calculation with chv_calc_dpll_params() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Populate bxt/glk DPLL clock limits a bit more Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Remove struct dp_link_dpll Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Clean up some dpll stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-02 3:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmn22be4.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox