From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Store the m2 divider as a whole in bxt_clk_div
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:36:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfry2blw.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301173128.6988-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 01 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Get rid of the pointless m2 int vs. frac split in bxt_clk_div
> and just store the whole divider as one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 33 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 899aa42a858f..4a82e630cbec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2085,8 +2085,7 @@ struct bxt_clk_div {
> int clock;
> u32 p1;
> u32 p2;
> - u32 m2_int;
> - u32 m2_frac;
> + u32 m2;
> u32 n;
>
> int vco;
> @@ -2094,13 +2093,20 @@ struct bxt_clk_div {
>
> /* pre-calculated values for DP linkrates */
> static const struct bxt_clk_div bxt_dp_clk_val[] = {
> - { .clock = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 27, .m2_frac = 0, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 27, .m2_frac = 0, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 24, .m2_frac = 1258291, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> - { .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> + { .clock = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> + { .clock = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac = 0 */ },
> + { .clock = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac = 0 */ },
> + { .clock = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> + { .clock = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x6133333 /* .m2_int = 24, m2_frac = 1258291 */ },
> + { .clock = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> + { .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> + .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
Mmh, I guess here I would've added some macros to construct m2 from
m2_int and m2_frac.
#define M2_INT_SHIFT 22
#define M2_FRAC_MASK 0x3fffff
#define M2(int, frac) ((int) << M2_INT_SHIFT) | (frac))
And you get this:
{ .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .m2 = M2(32, 1677722), .n = 1, },
No need to retain the int/frac in comments. Can also use
REG_FIELD_PREP/GET if you want to over-engineer...
> };
>
> static bool
> @@ -2127,8 +2133,7 @@ bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> clk_div->p2 = best_clock.p2;
> drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, best_clock.m1 != 2);
> clk_div->n = best_clock.n;
> - clk_div->m2_int = best_clock.m2 >> 22;
> - clk_div->m2_frac = best_clock.m2 & ((1 << 22) - 1);
> + clk_div->m2 = best_clock.m2;
>
> clk_div->vco = best_clock.vco;
>
> @@ -2197,11 +2202,11 @@ static bool bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> lanestagger = 0x02;
>
> dpll_hw_state->ebb0 = PORT_PLL_P1(clk_div->p1) | PORT_PLL_P2(clk_div->p2);
> - dpll_hw_state->pll0 = clk_div->m2_int;
> + dpll_hw_state->pll0 = clk_div->m2 >> 22;
> dpll_hw_state->pll1 = PORT_PLL_N(clk_div->n);
> - dpll_hw_state->pll2 = clk_div->m2_frac;
> + dpll_hw_state->pll2 = clk_div->m2 & 0x3fffff;
>
> - if (clk_div->m2_frac)
> + if (clk_div->m2 & 0x3fffff)
> dpll_hw_state->pll3 = PORT_PLL_M2_FRAC_ENABLE;
Also could reuse the shift and mask macros here.
Other than that, the direction seems good.
BR,
Jani.
>
> dpll_hw_state->pll6 = prop_coef | PORT_PLL_INT_COEFF(int_coef);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 17:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Clean up some dpll stuff Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Nuke skl_wrpll_context_init() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Move a bunch of stuff into rodata from the stack Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:13 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Clean up some struct/array initializers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Store the /5 target clock in sturct dpll on vlv/chv Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Remove bxt m2_frac_en Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:19 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Use designated initializers for bxt_dp_clk_val[] Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:20 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Store the m2 divider as a whole in bxt_clk_div Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:36 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-07 18:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Replace bxt_clk_div with struct dpll Ville Syrjala
2022-03-04 11:41 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Replace hand rolled bxt vco calculation with chv_calc_dpll_params() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Populate bxt/glk DPLL clock limits a bit more Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Remove struct dp_link_dpll Ville Syrjala
2022-03-01 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Clean up some dpll stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-02 3:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfry2blw.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox