From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/alpm: Move port alpm configuration
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 14:30:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eae1ec28-109a-41c6-a17e-3a45b50e6a0e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250502085902.154740-8-jouni.hogander@intel.com>
On 5/2/2025 2:28 PM, Jouni Högander wrote:
> It is specified in Bspec where port alpm configuration is supposed to be
> performed. Change accordingly.
>
> HAS: 14012758795
Lets drop references to HAS and add Bspec: 68849
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 53 +++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 6 +++
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 4a8d4b34fa89e..857ce83075d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> - enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.port;
> u32 alpm_ctl;
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20 || (!intel_psr_needs_alpm(intel_dp, crtc_state) &&
> @@ -374,23 +373,6 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> pr_alpm_ctl);
> }
>
> - intel_de_write(display,
> - PORT_ALPM_CTL(port),
> - PORT_ALPM_CTL_ALPM_AUX_LESS_ENABLE |
> - PORT_ALPM_CTL_MAX_PHY_SWING_SETUP(15) |
> - PORT_ALPM_CTL_MAX_PHY_SWING_HOLD(0) |
> - PORT_ALPM_CTL_SILENCE_PERIOD(
> - intel_dp->alpm_parameters.silence_period_sym_clocks));
> -
> - intel_de_write(display,
> - PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL(port),
> - PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT(10) |
> - PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> - intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms) |
> - PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_FIRST_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> - intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms) |
> - PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LAST_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> - intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms));
> } else {
> alpm_ctl = ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_ENABLE |
> ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_TIME(intel_dp->alpm_parameters.fast_wake_lines);
> @@ -414,6 +396,41 @@ void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> intel_dp->alpm_parameters.transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * intel_alpm_port_configure - Port ALPM configuration
> + * @intel_dp: Intel DP
> + * @crtc_state: CRTC state
> + *
> + * Perfrom port ALPM configuration based on crtc_state setup. This is called as
> + * a part of link training preparation.
> + */
> +void intel_alpm_port_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> + enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.port;
> + u32 alpm_ctl_val = 0, lfps_ctl_val = 0;
> +
> + if (intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> + alpm_ctl_val = PORT_ALPM_CTL_ALPM_AUX_LESS_ENABLE |
> + PORT_ALPM_CTL_MAX_PHY_SWING_SETUP(15) |
> + PORT_ALPM_CTL_MAX_PHY_SWING_HOLD(0) |
> + PORT_ALPM_CTL_SILENCE_PERIOD(
> + intel_dp->alpm_parameters.silence_period_sym_clocks);
> + lfps_ctl_val = PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT(10) |
> + PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> + intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms) |
> + PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_FIRST_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> + intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms) |
> + PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL_LAST_LFPS_HALF_CYCLE_DURATION(
> + intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms);
> + }
> +
> + intel_de_write(display, PORT_ALPM_CTL(port), alpm_ctl_val);
> +
> + intel_de_write(display, PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL(port), lfps_ctl_val);
> +}
> +
> void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> index 83bbe0b7ff100..c9ddb2113fe0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_alpm_port_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *connector);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index b09f724c3046b..1318886e34dd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #include "i915_reg.h"
> #include "i915_utils.h"
> +#include "intel_alpm.h"
> #include "intel_cx0_phy.h"
> #include "intel_cx0_phy_regs.h"
> #include "intel_ddi.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 74132c1d63858..ce7a4765b10ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3743,6 +3743,12 @@ static void mtl_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>
> intel_ddi_buf_enable(encoder, intel_dp->DP);
> intel_dp->DP |= DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * 6.k If AUX-Less ALPM is going to be enabled
> + * i. Configure PORT_ALPM_CTL and PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL here
> + */
> + intel_alpm_port_configure(intel_dp, crtc_state);
I think we should add a check to ensure this code runs only on LNL+
platforms (which supports ALPM).
Otherwise, we might end up writing
|PORT_ALPM_CTL|and|PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL| that are not defined on earlier
platforms, which could lead to unintended behavior.
Regards,
Ankit
> }
>
> static void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 8:58 [PATCH 00/11] Panel Replay + Adaptive sync Jouni Högander
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/dp: Add Panel Replay capability bits from DP2.1 specification Jouni Högander
2025-05-02 9:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-02 9:28 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-20 8:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 16:53 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/psr: Read both Panel Replay capability registers from DPCD Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 8:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 16:54 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/alpm: Add PR_ALPM_CTL register definitions Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 8:46 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/alpm: Write PR_ALPM_CTL register Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 8:49 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 16:55 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/psr: Add interface to check if AUXLess ALPM is needed by PSR Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 8:52 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 9:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 16:56 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/alpm: Add new interface to check if AUXLess ALPM is used Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 8:54 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 16:57 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/alpm: Move port alpm configuration Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 9:00 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-05-20 16:59 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/display: Add PHY_CMN1_CONTROL register definitions Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 9:01 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-02 8:59 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/display: Add function to configure LFPS sending Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 9:08 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-20 17:01 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-05-02 8:59 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/psr: Fix using wrong mask in REG_FIELD_PREP Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 9:09 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-02 8:59 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/psr: Do not disable Panel Replay in case VRR is enabled Jouni Högander
2025-05-20 9:13 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-02 13:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Panel Replay + Adaptive sync Patchwork
2025-05-02 13:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-05-02 13:30 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-05-02 18:19 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eae1ec28-109a-41c6-a17e-3a45b50e6a0e@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox