From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: "Iddamsetty, Aravind" <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
Cc: "Bommu, Krishnaiah" <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Ursulin, Tvrtko" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:24:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87leflhfc4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08824c36-4692-64aa-1774-d20a8c7d89eb@intel.com>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 20:11:12 -0700, Iddamsetty, Aravind wrote:
>
> On 12-07-2023 04:40, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:19:24 -0700, Iddamsetty, Aravind wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> Please let me know if you have any more questions around this.
> >
> > I've asked. But you probably know that since this is uapi, to merge this we
> > would need a fully reviewed UMD (non IGT) merge request which consumes what
> > we are exposing. So while we are reviewing this maybe let's ask L0 etc. for
> > the merge request. I looked at xpumanager but didn't see it consuming what
> > we are exposing via PMU here.
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> For the UAPI consumption we can use the linux generic perf tool, won't
> it be agreeable.
We can check with Joonas or Matt Roper, but afaiu because the linux generic
perf tool has nothing specific about what we are exposing it will not be
enough, we will need a L0 or another "approved" UMD merge request (I
believe L0 is approved).
> >
> > Maybe we'll need an ack from someone like Joonas too.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 12:21 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface Aravind Iddamsetty
2023-06-27 12:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Get GT clock to nanosecs Aravind Iddamsetty
2023-07-04 9:29 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-07-04 10:14 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-07-05 4:46 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-06 0:55 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-06-27 12:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface Aravind Iddamsetty
2023-06-30 13:53 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-07-03 5:11 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-04 3:34 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-07-05 4:52 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-04 9:10 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-07-05 4:42 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-06 2:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-06 13:42 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-07 2:18 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-07 3:53 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-07 6:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-07 10:42 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-07 21:25 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-10 6:05 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-10 8:12 ` Ursulin, Tvrtko
2023-07-11 16:19 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-11 23:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-12 3:11 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-12 5:24 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2023-07-11 22:58 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-09 0:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-10 4:13 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-10 5:57 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-18 5:07 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-19 6:59 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-06 2:40 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-07-06 13:06 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-21 1:02 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-21 11:51 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-21 23:36 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-22 6:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-24 8:03 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-24 9:00 ` Ursulin, Tvrtko
2023-07-24 15:52 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-24 15:52 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-24 16:05 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-24 16:31 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-25 11:38 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-08-07 21:16 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-07 22:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08 13:45 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-08-08 15:18 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-09 4:26 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-08-09 5:02 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-24 9:38 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-07-22 14:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-07-24 8:02 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-06-27 13:04 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-27 13:05 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-06-27 13:06 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-06-27 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-06-27 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87leflhfc4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox