From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH RFC v6 1/6] x86/entry: Add STACKLEAK erasing the kernel stack at the end of syscalls
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 00:54:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <221a291b-677a-1cc6-6270-bfc0a85ac225@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208114431.tzteuiovgnn53t5r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello Peter,
On 08.12.2017 14:44, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:33:42AM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
>> The STACKLEAK feature erases the kernel stack before returning from
>> syscalls. That reduces the information which kernel stack leak bugs can
>> reveal and blocks some uninitialized stack variable attacks. Moreover,
>> STACKLEAK provides runtime checks for kernel stack overflow detection.
>>
>> This commit introduces the architecture-specific code filling the used
>> part of the kernel stack with a poison value before returning to the
>> userspace. Full STACKLEAK feature also contains the gcc plugin which
>> comes in a separate commit.
>
> Have you looked at the entry rework in this series:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204140706.296109558@linutronix.de
Thanks for the link. I briefly looked through WIP.x86/pti branch. Should I
rebase STACKLEAK patch series onto it?
Although I don't fully understand some of the commits, I can suppose that
STACKLEAK stack erasing must be modified because of this trampoline stack
introduction:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=WIP.x86/pti&id=813b4125a835f2eb9aa6fb08dac0bc8eeadd69a1
Am I right? Are there other changes which I should consider?
May I also ask for your feedback on this version of the STACKLEAK patch series?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 23:33 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for it Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 1/6] x86/entry: Add STACKLEAK erasing the kernel stack at the end of syscalls Alexander Popov
2017-12-08 11:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 21:54 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2017-12-11 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 2/6] gcc-plugins: Add STACKLEAK plugin for tracking the kernel stack Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 18:57 ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2017-12-07 23:05 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-12 0:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " Dmitry V. Levin
2017-12-15 15:28 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 3/6] x86/entry: Erase kernel stack in syscall_trace_enter() Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 21:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2017-12-11 22:38 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 4/6] lkdtm: Add a test for STACKLEAK Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 19:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2017-12-06 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-06 23:06 ` Laura Abbott
2017-12-07 22:58 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-07 7:09 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-07 20:47 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 6/6] doc: self-protection: Add information about STACKLEAK feature Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=221a291b-677a-1cc6-6270-bfc0a85ac225@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox