From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
x86@kernel.org, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH RFC v6 5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:09:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fb044ec-cf1e-6281-01a9-c845b738914e@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7c64050-bbb6-be37-ec09-cb757bad116a@redhat.com>
Hello Laura and Kees,
[adding Tobin C. Harding]
On 06.12.2017 22:22, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 12/05/2017 03:33 PM, Alexander Popov wrote:
>> Introduce CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS providing STACKLEAK information about
>> tasks via the /proc file system. In particular, /proc/<pid>/lowest_stack
>> shows the current lowest_stack value and its final value from the previous
>> syscall. That information can be useful for estimating the STACKLEAK
>> performance impact for different workloads.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
>> ---
>> arch/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 4 ++++
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 4 ++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 +++
>> fs/proc/base.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
[...]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
>> +static int proc_lowest_stack(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>> + struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
>> +{
>> + seq_printf(m, "prev_lowest_stack: %pK\nlowest_stack: %pK\n",
>> + (void *)task->thread.prev_lowest_stack,
>> + (void *)task->thread.lowest_stack);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS */
>> +
>
> This just prints the hashed value with the new pointer leak work.
> I don't think we want to print the fully exposed value via %px so
> it's not clear how valuable this proc file is now.
Yes, I tested that before sending the patch. I was confused when I saw the
hashed values. But setting kptr_restrict to 1 fixed that for me:
root@hobbit:~# cat /proc/2627/lowest_stack
prev_lowest_stack: 00000000ed8ca991
lowest_stack: 0000000040579d76
root@hobbit:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
root@hobbit:~# cat /proc/2627/lowest_stack
prev_lowest_stack: ffffc9000094fdb8
lowest_stack: ffffc9000094f9e0
However, Documentation/printk-formats.txt and Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt
don't specify that behaviour.
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 23:33 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for it Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 1/6] x86/entry: Add STACKLEAK erasing the kernel stack at the end of syscalls Alexander Popov
2017-12-08 11:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 21:54 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-11 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 2/6] gcc-plugins: Add STACKLEAK plugin for tracking the kernel stack Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 18:57 ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2017-12-07 23:05 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-12 0:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " Dmitry V. Levin
2017-12-15 15:28 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 3/6] x86/entry: Erase kernel stack in syscall_trace_enter() Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 21:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2017-12-11 22:38 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 4/6] lkdtm: Add a test for STACKLEAK Alexander Popov
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system Alexander Popov
2017-12-06 19:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2017-12-06 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-06 23:06 ` Laura Abbott
2017-12-07 22:58 ` Alexander Popov
2017-12-07 7:09 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2017-12-07 20:47 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-05 23:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH RFC v6 6/6] doc: self-protection: Add information about STACKLEAK feature Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5fb044ec-cf1e-6281-01a9-c845b738914e@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox