Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Colton Lewis" <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/22] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:55:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924175515.68D951F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924172928.2110956-18-coltonlewis@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: arm64: PMU hardware permanently frozen after live migration
--

commit 458afe99983a6c37492623080fcc934e4e368118
Author: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>

KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps
    
This patch implements lazy PMU context swapping to avoid the overhead of
reserving hardware counters on every vCPU load and put. It introduces per-vCPU
PMU ownership tracking, transitioning to GUEST_OWNED only when the guest
actively enables PMU counters or interrupts.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-direct.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-direct.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-direct.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-direct.c
> @@ -336,7 +342,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * If we aren't guest-owned then we know the guest isn't using
>  	 * the PMU anyway, so no need to bother with the swap.
>  	 */
> -	if (!kvm_pmu_is_partitioned(vcpu->kvm))
> +	if (!kvm_pmu_is_partitioned(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +	    kvm_pmu_get_access(vcpu) != VCPU_PMU_ACCESS_GUEST_OWNED ||
> +	    vcpu->arch.pmu.loaded_on_cpu)

[Severity: High]
Does this logic cause the PMU hardware to remain permanently frozen after a
live migration?

When userspace restores the PMU state via KVM_SET_ONE_REG (which routes
through set_pmcr() and set_pmreg() in arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c), it
bypasses pmu_reg_write() and assigns the system registers directly. Because
the state is never transitioned to VCPU_PMU_ACCESS_GUEST_OWNED on this
restore path, it remains VCPU_PMU_ACCESS_FREE.

Later, when kvm_pmu_load() runs, it aborts early due to the access state
being FREE, meaning the physical counters are never configured or started.
Although kvm_pmu_part_overflow_status() acts as a fallback to catch state
restoration, it explicitly requires an overflow to be pending:

arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-direct.c:kvm_pmu_part_overflow_status() {
    ...
    if (overflow && kvm_pmu_get_access(vcpu) == VCPU_PMU_ACCESS_FREE)
        kvm_pmu_set_guest_owned(vcpu);
    ...
}

If the guest is migrated while actively counting but no overflow is pending,
the counters will never tick, will never overflow, and this fallback will
never trigger. Could the restore paths be updated to ensure the ownership
transitions correctly?

>  		return;
>  
>  	preempt_disable();

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924172928.2110956-1-coltonlewis@google.com?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 17:29 [PATCH v9 00/22] ARM64 PMU Partitioning Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 01/22] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0 Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 02/22] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU includes Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 03/22] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU functions Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 04/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Generalize counter bitmasks Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 05/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Move counter allocation mask to per-CPU struct pmu_hw_events Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 06/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Check cntr_mask before using pmccntr Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 07/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Allocate counter indices from high to low Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 08/22] KVM: arm64: Add initial scaffolding for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 09/22] KVM: arm64: Set up FGT " Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 10/22] KVM: arm64: Add Partitioned PMU register trap handlers Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 11/22] KVM: arm64: Set up MDCR_EL2 to handle a Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 12/22] KVM: arm64: Context swap Partitioned PMU guest registers Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 13/22] KVM: arm64: Enforce PMU event filter at vcpu_load() Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 14/22] perf: Add perf_pmu_resched_update() Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 15/22] KVM: arm64: Allow kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0() to resync filters in process context Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 16/22] KVM: arm64: Apply dynamic guest counter reservations Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 15:28   ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33     ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 17/22] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 18/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Handle IRQs for Partitioned PMU guest counters Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 18:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 19/22] KVM: arm64: Detect overflows for the Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 18:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 20/22] KVM: arm64: Add vCPU device attr to partition the PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 15:27   ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:21     ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 21/22] KVM: selftests: Add find_bit to KVM library Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 22/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add test case for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 17:30 ` [PATCH] target/arm: Enable KVM PMU partitioning and counter limit Colton Lewis
2026-09-28 14:01   ` Peter Maydell
2026-09-29 21:21     ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 11:35       ` Peter Maydell
2026-10-01 21:34         ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 15:25 ` [PATCH v9 00/22] ARM64 PMU Partitioning James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33   ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 15:26 ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33   ` Colton Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924175515.68D951F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox