Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:28:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGhgGB5icVpDxnQ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arE1KVBNtkEWJDvN@LeoBrasDK>

Hi Leo,

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > +static void compute_s2_permissions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
> > +				   struct s2_walk_step *ws, struct kvm_s2_trans *trans)
> > +{
> > +	u8 s2ap = FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP, ws->desc);
> > +	u8 xn = FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN, ws->desc);
> > +
> > +	if (!kvm_has_xnx(vcpu->kvm))
> > +		xn &= 0b10;
> > +
> > +	switch (xn) {
> > +	case 0b00:
> > +		trans->px = trans->ux = true;
> > +		break;
> > +	case 0b01:
> > +		trans->px = false;
> > +		trans->ux = true;
> > +		break;
> > +	case 0b10:
> > +		trans->px = trans->ux = false;
> > +		break;
> > +	case 0b11:
> > +		trans->px = true;
> > +		trans->ux = false;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> Nit: couldn't the above be summarized as below?
> 
> 	trans->ux = !(xn & BIT(1));
> 
> 	if (kvm_has_xnx(vcpu->kvm) && xn & BIT(0)) 
> 		trans->px = !trans->ux;
> 	else
> 		trans->px = trans->ux;
> 					
> 
> or maybe even skip the FIELD_GET and do:
> 
> 	trans->ux = !(ws->desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S1_UXN);
> 
> 	if (kvm_has_xnx(vcpu->kvm) &&
> 	    ws->desc & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S1_PXN) 
> 		trans->px = !trans->ux;
> 	else
> 		trans->px = trans->ux;
> 
> 
> Maybe it's just me, but that looks easier to understand what each bit does 
> based on the feature.

I had opted for a switch statement because I think it's a direct
translation of the truth table in R_STCTY.

> FWIW:
> Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>

Thanks!

Best,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 11:30   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 13:46   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-21 21:28     ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 16:18   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-21 16:51   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-21 21:39     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 17:28   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-21 21:45     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-22 14:24       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-09-22 16:14   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-22 16:31     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08  7:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 14:09   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 16:46     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 14:38   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 17:16     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-24 17:22       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 15:47   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 16:21   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 20:37     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 11:10       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-09-23 17:03   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-23 20:23     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 11:20       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 14:35   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-25 15:07   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 15:18   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-09-25 15:51   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 15:53   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:33   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 14:40   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:42   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 16:01   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-28 17:06   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33     ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02  6:50       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-28 17:21   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29     ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-18 14:55 ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arGhgGB5icVpDxnQ@kernel.org \
    --to=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox