* [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
@ 2013-03-19 10:41 Paul Bolle
2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2013-03-19 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel
Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro was
removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that macro
was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can now be removed
too, as it is unused.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
Eyeball tested.
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 92ed969..006b714 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -298,14 +298,6 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt to control the type and
amount of debug output.
-config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
- bool "Additionally enable ACPI function tracing"
- default n
- depends on ACPI_DEBUG
- help
- ACPI Debug Statements slow down ACPI processing. Function trace
- is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
-
config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
bool "PCI slot detection driver"
depends on SYSFS
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-03-19 10:41 [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE" Paul Bolle
@ 2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-04 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-03-26 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle, Lv Zheng; +Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:41:01 AM Paul Bolle wrote:
> Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro was
> removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that macro
> was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can now be removed
> too, as it is unused.
Lv, can you please comment here?
Rafael
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Eyeball tested.
>
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 92ed969..006b714 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -298,14 +298,6 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt to control the type and
> amount of debug output.
>
> -config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
> - bool "Additionally enable ACPI function tracing"
> - default n
> - depends on ACPI_DEBUG
> - help
> - ACPI Debug Statements slow down ACPI processing. Function trace
> - is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
> -
> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> depends on SYSFS
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-04-04 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-04-04 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lv Zheng; +Cc: Paul Bolle, Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 02:34:25 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:41:01 AM Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro was
> > removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that macro
> > was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can now be removed
> > too, as it is unused.
>
> Lv, can you please comment here?
Lv, I'm still waiting for your comment regarding the commit mentioned above.
Thanks,
Rafael
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> > ---
> > Eyeball tested.
> >
> > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 8 --------
> > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > index 92ed969..006b714 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > @@ -298,14 +298,6 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt to control the type and
> > amount of debug output.
> >
> > -config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
> > - bool "Additionally enable ACPI function tracing"
> > - default n
> > - depends on ACPI_DEBUG
> > - help
> > - ACPI Debug Statements slow down ACPI processing. Function trace
> > - is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
> > -
> > config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> > bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> > depends on SYSFS
> >
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-04 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 7:07 ` Zheng, Lv
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zheng, Lv @ 2013-04-07 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Paul Bolle
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro was
> > removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that macro
> > was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can now be
> > removed too, as it is unused.
>
> Lv, can you please comment here?
Sorry for the delayed reply.
The commit should have done something that already have been done in the ACPICA.
I'll take a look at this.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
@ 2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 8:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 7:07 ` Zheng, Lv
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zheng, Lv @ 2013-04-07 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zheng, Lv, Rafael J. Wysocki, Paul Bolle
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moore, Robert
> > > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro
> > > was removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that
> > > macro was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can
> now
> > > be removed too, as it is unused.
> >
> > Lv, can you please comment here?
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> The commit should have done something that already have been done in the
> ACPICA.
> I'll take a look at this.
The original commit deleted CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE from acmacros.h as it is in the __wrong__ place.
CONFIG_xxx is linux specific codes thus should appear in OSL layer - aclinux.h.
ACPICA specific codes should only use selective definitions in #ifdef ACPI_xxx style and such codes should be merged into ACPICA rather than being merged into Linux ACPI.
Now we have two choices:
Re-implement it in the aclinux.h using "ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT" defined/undefined or delete this kernel configuration item temporarily.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
@ 2013-04-07 7:07 ` Zheng, Lv
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zheng, Lv @ 2013-04-07 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Paul Bolle
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moore, Robert
> > > > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > > > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro
> > > > was removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > > > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > > > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that
> > > > macro was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can
> > now
> > > > be removed too, as it is unused.
> > >
> > > Lv, can you please comment here?
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed reply.
> >
> > The commit should have done something that already have been done in
> > the ACPICA.
> > I'll take a look at this.
>
> The original commit deleted CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE from
> acmacros.h as it is in the __wrong__ place.
> CONFIG_xxx is linux specific codes thus should appear in OSL layer - aclinux.h.
> ACPICA specific codes should only use selective definitions in #ifdef ACPI_xxx
> style and such codes should be merged into ACPICA rather than being merged
> into Linux ACPI.
>
> Now we have two choices:
> Re-implement it in the aclinux.h using "ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT"
> defined/undefined or delete this kernel configuration item temporarily.
Sorry, I made a mistake here.
ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT is already covered by the CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG.
The corrected statement should be:
If we want to fine tune the output, then the codes might be implemented in ACPICA first and then get utilized in Linux using the new ACPICA feature.
Best regards
-Lv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
@ 2013-04-07 8:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-04-07 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zheng, Lv
Cc: Paul Bolle, Len Brown, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moore, Robert
On Sunday, April 07, 2013 07:00:34 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > > > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > > > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro
> > > > was removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > > > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > > > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that
> > > > macro was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can
> > now
> > > > be removed too, as it is unused.
> > >
> > > Lv, can you please comment here?
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed reply.
> >
> > The commit should have done something that already have been done in the
> > ACPICA.
> > I'll take a look at this.
>
> The original commit deleted CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE from acmacros.h as it is in the __wrong__ place.
> CONFIG_xxx is linux specific codes thus should appear in OSL layer - aclinux.h.
> ACPICA specific codes should only use selective definitions in #ifdef ACPI_xxx style and such codes should be merged into ACPICA rather than being merged into Linux ACPI.
>
> Now we have two choices:
> Re-implement it in the aclinux.h using "ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT" defined/undefined or delete
> this kernel configuration item temporarily.
OK
I'll apply the Paul's patch then and we'll decide what to do with that config
option later.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-07 8:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-19 10:41 [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE" Paul Bolle
2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-04 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 8:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 7:07 ` Zheng, Lv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox