From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
<liaochang1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/38] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support for FEAT_NMI
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:22:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66da4eb2-b3ef-4786-a447-7c4508f97ab1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914102102.68597-24-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
在 2026/9/14 18:20, Vladimir Murzin 写道:
> From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>
> Use of FEAT_NMI requires that all the PEs in the system and the GIC
> have NMI support. This patch implements the PE part of that detection.
>
> In order to avoid problematic interactions between real and pseudo NMIs
> we disable the architected feature if the user has enabled pseudo NMIs
> on the command line. If this is done on a system where support for the
> architected feature is detected then a warning is printed during boot in
> order to help users spot what is likely to be a misconfiguration.
>
> As KVM does not care about the host kernel supporting FEAT_NMI or not
> to allow guests to use it, split the CPU cap in two : ARM64_HAS_NMI is
> the hardware support, ARM64_NMI is the kernel making use of it.
>
> Co-developed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 +++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> index 76350b38f0d7..1a4ef4e94997 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ cpucap_is_possible(const unsigned int cap)
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS);
> case ARM64_HAS_LSUI:
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_LSUI);
> + case ARM64_NMI:
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_NMI);
> }
>
> return true;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 09aa80df602a..c8b1bacdd161 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -809,6 +809,16 @@ static __always_inline bool system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
> return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING);
> }
>
> +static __always_inline bool system_supports_nmi(void)
> +{
> + return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_NMI);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool system_uses_nmi(void)
> +{
> + return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_NMI);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool system_supports_mte(void)
> {
> return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_MTE);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 32102c3912fa..f9fe7a875f85 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -83,13 +83,14 @@
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupts/common_flags.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/mpam.h>
> #include <asm/mte.h>
> -#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> @@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr1[] = {
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE_IF_IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_GCS),
> FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_GCS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_NMI_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE_IF_IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME),
> FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_SME_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MPAM_frac_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> @@ -2341,6 +2343,51 @@ static bool has_gic_prio_relaxed_sync(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_NMI
> +static bool can_use_nmi(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope)
> +{
> + /*
> + * ARM64_HAS_NMI has a lower index, and is a boot CPU
> + * feature, so will be detected earlier.
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARM64_NMI <= ARM64_HAS_NMI);
> + if (!cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_NMI))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Having both real and pseudo NMIs enabled simultaneously is
> + * likely to cause confusion. Since pseudo NMIs must be
> + * enabled with an explicit command line option, if the user
> + * has set that option on a system with real NMIs for some
> + * reason assume they know what they're doing.
> + *
> + * ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING has a lower index, and is a boot CPU
> + * feature, so will be detected earlier.
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) &&
> + (ARM64_NMI <= ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING));
> + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING)) {
> + pr_info_once("Pseudo NMI enabled, not using architected NMI\n");
> + return false;
Hi, Vladimir,
The user's actual requirement may be to use FEAT_NMI by default when it
is available, and fall back to pseudo-NMI otherwise, since pseudo-NMI
has inherent noise and is only a second choice when there is no hardware
support. Can we design it this way?
Best regards,
Jinjie
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void nmi_enable(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Enable use of NMIs controlled by ALLINT, SPINTMASK should
> + * be clear by default but make it explicit that we are using
> + * this mode. Ensure that ALLINT is clear first in order to
> + * avoid leaving things masked.
> + */
> + _allint_clear();
> + sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, SCTLR_EL1_SPINTMASK, SCTLR_EL1_NMI);
> + isb();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static bool can_trap_icv_dir_el1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
> int scope)
> {
> @@ -3233,6 +3280,25 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1, LSUI, IMP)
> },
> +#endif
> + {
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_NMI,
> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, NMI, IMP)
> + },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_NMI
> + /*
> + * Depends on ARM64_HAS_NMI
> + * Checks for conflict with pseudo-NMIs, giving them priority.
> + */
> + {
> + .desc = "Non-maskable Interrupts",
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
> + .capability = ARM64_NMI,
> + .matches = can_use_nmi,
> + .cpu_enable = nmi_enable,
> + },
> #endif
> {},
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index 2775ba3359cf..531583822ec2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ HAS_LS64_V
> HAS_LSUI
> HAS_MOPS
> HAS_NESTED_VIRT
> +HAS_NMI
> HAS_NV2P1
> HAS_NV3
> HAS_PAN
> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ MTE
> MTE_ASYMM
> MTE_FAR
> MTE_STORE_ONLY
> +NMI
> SME
> SME_FA64
> SME2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 10:20 [PATCH 00/38] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 01/38] arm64: irqflags: Introduce arm64-specific irqflags type Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 02/38] arm64: irqflags: save and use both DAIF and PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 03/38] arm64: interrupts: Add common exception state helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 8:58 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-17 9:10 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:10 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-21 23:13 ` Ashok Raj
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 04/38] arm64: process: Lift check for exception state to generic infrastructure Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 05/38] arm64: entry: Introduce entry specific exception masking helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 9:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:15 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 06/38] arm64: entry: replace DAIF helpers with entry helpers Vladimir Murzin
[not found] ` <15bc779f-e6f5-4c2a-a629-cb020f12a41a@huawei.com>
2026-09-21 14:01 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 07/38] arm64: interrupts: Introduce exception masking save/restore helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 08/38] arm64: interrupts: introduce a helper for GIC priority initialization Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 09/38] arm64: replace local_daif helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 8:14 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:07 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 10/38] arm64: cpuidle: use new helpers to bypass interrupt priority masking Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 11/38] arm64: remove daifflags.h Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 12/38] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 13/38] arm64: cpufeature: Remove system_has_prio_mask_debugging() Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 14/38] arm64: irqflags: Switch to CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 15/38] arm64: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 16/38] efi/runtime-wrappers: Permit architectures to override IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 17/38] arm64/efi: Implement override for " Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 18/38] arm64: booting: Document boot requirements for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 19/38] arm64: sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 20/38] arm64: probes: Reject stepping over ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 8:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 21/38] arm64: ptrace: Add PSR_ALLINT_BIT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 22/38] arm64: idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 23/38] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support " Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:22 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-21 13:53 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 24/38] arm64: nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 25/38] arm64: irq: Report FEAT_NMI masking local IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 26/38] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:16 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 27/38] arm64: suspend: Always initialise PSTATE.ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 28/38] arm64/efi: Add ALLINT to IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 29/38] arm64: kprobes: Disable NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 30/38] arm64: smp: Abstract SGI and LPI operations Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 13:44 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 31/38] arm64: smp: Fall back to IRQ when IPI NMI request fails Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 32/38] arm64: nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 13:47 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 33/38] irqchip/gic-v3: Rename nmi to pseudo_nmi Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 34/38] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 35/38] arm64: smp: Add NMI support for LPI-backed IPIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 36/38] genirq: Trust local irqchip when considering IRQ for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 12:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 37/38] genirq: Do not call add_interrupt_randomness() in NMI context Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 38/38] irqchip/gic-v5: Add NMI support Vladimir Murzin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66da4eb2-b3ef-4786-a447-7c4508f97ab1@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox