From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
maz@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org, liaochang1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/38] arm64: replace local_daif helpers
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:07:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8f1e057-ef42-4673-9d7f-ee3bed005185@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96fc2985-a4a2-4f07-8f27-603d876e0fea@huawei.com>
On 9/17/26 09:14, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>
> 在 2026/9/14 18:20, Vladimir Murzin 写道:
>> From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>>
>> Replace existing `local_daif_...` usage with the new `local_all_irqs...`
>> helpers, adding the necessary save-state struct where required.
>>
>> Slightly rework `apei_claim_sea()`'s handling of interrupt masking to
>> fit with the new APIs. Currently, it saves the DAIF flags to restore
>> later and the `local_irq` ones to check if interrupts are disabled.
>> It then masks AIF to signal the SEA (forcing DAIF masking), and will
>> unmask to IF (re-enabling PMR masking if pseudo-NMIs are in use) if it
>> interrupted a task with interrupts unmaksed, restoring with the DAIF
>> flags from the beginning afterwards.
>>
>> As we want to preserve a "mask/unmask" process, change the logic from
>> "mask AIF/unmask A/unmask IF" to "mask IF/mask A/unmask A/unmask IF" :
>> first mask with `local_irq_save()`, mask/unmask further around the
>> SEA signaling, and restore at the end with `local_irq_restore()`.
>> Now that both APIs properly work with DAIF and PMR, this works
>> as expected and also removes the need for a "save flags without masking"
>> function for the new helpers, as this was the only user.
>>
>> Remove the use of GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET in `kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c`,
>> as we now check both PMR and DAIF everywhere and we don't need to signal
>> interrupts being masked in DAIF in the PMR anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 15 +++++++--------
>> arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++-----
>> arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c | 7 ++++---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 7 ++++---
>> 10 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> index 681aa2bbc399..ea9a9da7e412 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>> -#include <asm/daifflags.h>
>> +#include <asm/interrupts/masking.h>
>> #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>>
>> int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */
>> @@ -391,15 +391,14 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> int err = -ENOENT;
>> bool return_to_irqs_enabled;
>> unsigned long current_flags;
>> + arm64_exc_hwstates_t hwstate;
>>
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES))
>> return err;
>>
>> - current_flags = local_daif_save_flags();
>> -
>> - /* current_flags isn't useful here as daif doesn't tell us about pNMI */
>> - return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
>> + local_irq_save(current_flags);
>>
>> + return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(current_flags);
>> if (regs)
>> return_to_irqs_enabled = !regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
>>
>> @@ -407,10 +406,11 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> * SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
>> * that APEI defers the handling.
>> */
>> - local_daif_restore(DAIF_ERRCTX);
>> + hwstate = local_exceptions_save_mask(ERROR_CONTEXT);
>> nmi_enter();
>> err = ghes_notify_sea();
>> nmi_exit();
>> + local_exceptions_restore(hwstate);
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I think mixing local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore() and
> local_exceptions_save_mask()/local_exceptions_restore here may be
> problematic, because arch_local_irq_save() does not take into full
> account the state of DAIF and the pseudo-NMI. For example, when the
> pseudo-NMI is enabled, arch_local_irq_save() only sets PMR to
> GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF without taking DAIF into consideration, whereas
> local_exceptions_save_mask(NOIRQ_CONTEXT) additionally clears all the
> DAIF bits.
>
> But whereas local_exceptions_save_mask() returns exactly the current
> hwstate arch_local_irq_save() sets, and local_exceptions_restore() also
> needs to restore a unified state.
>
Hi Jinjie,
Yeah, that nesting makes my head spin. Would it be cleaner to apply
the masking sequentially, something like:
int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
arm64_exc_hwstates_t hwstate;
bool irqs_disabled;
int err = -ENOENT;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES))
return err;
/*
* SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
* that APEI defers the handling.
*/
hwstate = local_exceptions_save_mask(ERROR_CONTEXT);
nmi_enter();
err = ghes_notify_sea();
nmi_exit();
local_exceptions_restore(hwstate);
if (err)
return err;
/*
* APEI NMI-like notifications are deferred to irq_work. Unless
* we interrupted irqs-masked code, we can do that now.
*/
irqs_disabled = regs ? regs_irqs_disabled(regs) : arch_irqs_disabled_flags(hwstate.saved.flags);
if (!irqs_disabled) {
hwstate = local_exceptions_save_mask(NOIRQ_CONTEXT);
__irq_enter();
irq_work_run();
__irq_exit();
local_exceptions_restore(hwstate);
} else {
pr_warn_ratelimited("APEI work queued but not completed\n");
err = -EINPROGRESS;
}
return err;
}
Cheers
Vladimir
> Best regards,
> Jinjie
>
>>
>> /*
>> * APEI NMI-like notifications are deferred to irq_work. Unless
>> @@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> */
>> if (!err) {
>> if (return_to_irqs_enabled) {
>> - local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
>> __irq_enter();
>> irq_work_run();
>> __irq_exit();
>> @@ -428,7 +427,7 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - local_daif_restore(current_flags);
>> + local_irq_restore(current_flags);
>>
>> return err;
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 10:20 [PATCH 00/38] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 01/38] arm64: irqflags: Introduce arm64-specific irqflags type Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 02/38] arm64: irqflags: save and use both DAIF and PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 03/38] arm64: interrupts: Add common exception state helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 8:58 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-17 9:10 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:10 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-21 23:13 ` Ashok Raj
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 04/38] arm64: process: Lift check for exception state to generic infrastructure Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 05/38] arm64: entry: Introduce entry specific exception masking helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 9:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:15 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 06/38] arm64: entry: replace DAIF helpers with entry helpers Vladimir Murzin
[not found] ` <15bc779f-e6f5-4c2a-a629-cb020f12a41a@huawei.com>
2026-09-21 14:01 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 07/38] arm64: interrupts: Introduce exception masking save/restore helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 08/38] arm64: interrupts: introduce a helper for GIC priority initialization Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 09/38] arm64: replace local_daif helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 8:14 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:07 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 10/38] arm64: cpuidle: use new helpers to bypass interrupt priority masking Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 11/38] arm64: remove daifflags.h Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 12/38] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 13/38] arm64: cpufeature: Remove system_has_prio_mask_debugging() Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 14/38] arm64: irqflags: Switch to CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 15/38] arm64: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 16/38] efi/runtime-wrappers: Permit architectures to override IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 17/38] arm64/efi: Implement override for " Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 18/38] arm64: booting: Document boot requirements for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 19/38] arm64: sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 20/38] arm64: probes: Reject stepping over ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 8:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 21/38] arm64: ptrace: Add PSR_ALLINT_BIT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 22/38] arm64: idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 23/38] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support " Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:22 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 13:53 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 24/38] arm64: nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 25/38] arm64: irq: Report FEAT_NMI masking local IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 26/38] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 14:16 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 27/38] arm64: suspend: Always initialise PSTATE.ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 28/38] arm64/efi: Add ALLINT to IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 29/38] arm64: kprobes: Disable NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 30/38] arm64: smp: Abstract SGI and LPI operations Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 13:44 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 31/38] arm64: smp: Fall back to IRQ when IPI NMI request fails Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 32/38] arm64: nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-16 9:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-21 13:47 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 33/38] irqchip/gic-v3: Rename nmi to pseudo_nmi Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 34/38] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:20 ` [PATCH 35/38] arm64: smp: Add NMI support for LPI-backed IPIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 36/38] genirq: Trust local irqchip when considering IRQ for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 12:06 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 37/38] genirq: Do not call add_interrupt_randomness() in NMI context Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-17 11:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 38/38] irqchip/gic-v5: Add NMI support Vladimir Murzin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8f1e057-ef42-4673-9d7f-ee3bed005185@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox