Re: [PATCH v3 37/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Add GCC CX power domain

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The `power-domains` property is added to the GCC device tree node, but it is not documented in the corresponding `qcom,sdx75-gcc.yaml` device tree binding schema.
--

--- Patch [37]: [PATCH v3 37/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Add GCC CX power domain ---
commit 31a230bc14fd1ed4b8fc915db1a0015701f6c99b
Author: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>

arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: Add GCC CX power domain

This commit adds a reference to the RPMh CX power domain in the SDX75 GCC
node. This allows consumers of GCC-provided GDSCs to propagate their local
domain votes to the required CX state.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> index 85cc9c6e6f83f..d4ef90c4a8db2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi
> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ gcc: clock-controller@80000 {
>  			#clock-cells = <1>;
>  			#reset-cells = <1>;
>  			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +			power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;

[Severity: Low]
Will adding this property cause a dtbs_check validation regression?

The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdx75-gcc.yaml schema
does not appear to document the power-domains property, and it enforces
unevaluatedProperties: false.

Does the schema need to be updated alongside this change to prevent
validation errors?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-0-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com?part=37