Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:28:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824122825.06D6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-14-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Low] Missing DT Binding Update for `power-domains` property.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] System crash (synchronous external abort) due to unclocked register access during `clk_round_rate()` on DFS clocks.
- [High] System crash due to missing PM Runtime protection in reset operations.
--

--- Patch [14]: [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller ---
commit 51623b28802cf5aef15aece18cd9939c8e2691bb
Author: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>

clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller
    
Enable runtime PM for the controller, allowing CX to be powered down
once all GCC consumers have released their clocks and GDSCs.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> index 915bb9b4ff813..172303ac4c9bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> @@ -2649,6 +2649,7 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_qdu1000_desc = {
>  	.num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qdu1000_resets),
>  	.gdscs = gcc_qdu1000_gdscs,
>  	.num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qdu1000_gdscs),
> +	.use_rpm = true,

[Severity: Low]
Does enabling runtime PM here introduce a dependency on a power-domains
property that needs to be documented in the controller's specific binding?
Without updating qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml, might this lead to missing DT
constraints or dtbs_check warnings?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but enabling runtime PM for this
controller exposes a pre-existing issue in the DFS clocks implementation.

When a consumer driver calls clk_round_rate() on an unprepared DFS clock,
the CCF clk_round_rate() API calls determine_rate() without holding a PM
runtime reference.

If the GCC device is suspended (CX domain off), can this sequence cause a
synchronous external abort due to unclocked register access?

drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:clk_rcg2_dfs_determine_rate() {
    ...
    ret = clk_rcg2_dfs_populate_freq_table(rcg);
    ...
}

drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:clk_rcg2_dfs_populate_freq_table() {
    ...
    regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr + SE_PERF_DFSR(l), &cfg);
    ...
}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but enabling runtime PM on the QDU1000
controller also exposes a vulnerability in the reset operations.

The reset functions appear to access hardware registers directly without
using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() on the GCC device.

If a consumer asserts or deasserts a reset while the GCC provider is
runtime suspended, will this unclocked register access crash the system?

drivers/clk/qcom/reset.c:qcom_reset_set_assert() {
    ...
    regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, assert ? mask : 0);
    ...
}

>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id gcc_qdu1000_match_table[] = {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-0-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com?part=14

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 11:53 [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sdm845: Add CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 20:39   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25  7:30     ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-25  7:34       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25  8:01         ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: qcs615-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8550-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8650-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8750-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/47] clk: qcom: gcc-eliza: Tie the CX power domain to controller Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 11/47] clk: qcom: gcc-kaanapali: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sa8775p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7280: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm845: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 21/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 22/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 23/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 24/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 25/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 26/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 27/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 28/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 29/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 30/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 31/47] clk: qcom: gcc-x1e80100: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 32/47] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add GCC CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 33/47] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 34/47] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 35/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 36/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 37/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 38/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 39/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 40/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 41/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 42/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 43/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 44/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 45/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 46/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 47/47] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Vinod Koul
2026-08-25  7:32   ` Abel Vesa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260824122825.06D6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox