Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] dt-binding: Add register-settings binding

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

Hi Rob, Krzysztof, Conor,

On 30/09/2025 16:01, Jon Hunter wrote:

...

>> Following your series, I would like to bring to your attention that
>> Texas Instruments SoCs also have a component which requires similar kind
>> of configuration, named Timesync Router(TSR). It enables the
>> multiplexing of M inputs to N outputs, where inputs can be selectively
>> driven based on N output configuration. A detailed explanation of the
>> TSR and our attempts we tried to implement TSR can be found in following
>> RFC series:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250605063422.3813260-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250205160119.136639-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
>>
>> To implement TSR, the relevant registers must be configured via the
>> device tree. We initially assumed that the device could be handled as a
>> mux-controller and could be extended in the same subsystem, but it was
>> ineffective. Having explored both the approaches, we now plan to
>> implement TSR within misc subsystem, which aligns with the dt-bindings
>> that you have proposed in this series.
>>
>> The purpose to replying over this series is to inform you that we also
>> have a component requiring configuration as outlined in this series. Let
>> us know if you have any suggestions for this.
> 
> That's great! Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> Rob, Krzysztof, Conor, have you guys had chance to look at this series 
> some more? We are open to re-working it as necessary to address any 
> concerns/comments you have. However, this appears to be stalled at the 
> moment and I am not sure what we should do next to push this forward.


Please can you respond to this? It is unclear if/how we can move forward 
on this.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic