Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] dt-binding: Add register-settings binding

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

Hi Chintan,

On 29/09/2025 05:39, Chintan Vankar wrote:

...

> Following your series, I would like to bring to your attention that
> Texas Instruments SoCs also have a component which requires similar kind
> of configuration, named Timesync Router(TSR). It enables the
> multiplexing of M inputs to N outputs, where inputs can be selectively
> driven based on N output configuration. A detailed explanation of the
> TSR and our attempts we tried to implement TSR can be found in following
> RFC series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250605063422.3813260-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250205160119.136639-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
> 
> To implement TSR, the relevant registers must be configured via the
> device tree. We initially assumed that the device could be handled as a
> mux-controller and could be extended in the same subsystem, but it was
> ineffective. Having explored both the approaches, we now plan to
> implement TSR within misc subsystem, which aligns with the dt-bindings
> that you have proposed in this series.
> 
> The purpose to replying over this series is to inform you that we also
> have a component requiring configuration as outlined in this series. Let
> us know if you have any suggestions for this.

That's great! Thanks for the feedback.

Rob, Krzysztof, Conor, have you guys had chance to look at this series 
some more? We are open to re-working it as necessary to address any 
concerns/comments you have. However, this appears to be stalled at the 
moment and I am not sure what we should do next to push this forward.

Thanks!
Jon

-- 
nvpublic