From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: allowing for a completely cached umount(2) pathwalk
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:22:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414162253.GL3390869@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4F5C98-AA06-40FB-AE51-79E860CD1D76@hammerspace.com>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 03:57:34PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > Being able to convert into an O_PATH descriptor gives you more options than just unmounting. It should allow you to syncfs() before unmounting. It should allow you to call open_tree() so you can manipulate the filesystem that is no longer accessible by path walk (e.g. so you can bind it elsewhere or move it).
> >
>
> One more thing it might allow us to do, which I’ve been wanting for a while in NFS: allow us to flip the mount type from being “hard” to “soft” before doing the lazy unmount, so that any application that might still retry I/O after the call to umount_begin() completes will start timing out with an I/O error, and free up the resources it might otherwise hold forever.
>
s/lazy/forced/, surely? Confused...
Note, BTW, that hard vs. soft is a property of fs instance; if you have
it present elsewhere in the mount tree, flipping it would affect all
such places. I don't see any good way to make it a per-mount thing, TBH...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 22:00 allowing for a completely cached umount(2) pathwalk Jeff Layton
2023-04-13 22:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2023-04-13 22:41 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-14 2:43 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 3:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 3:51 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 4:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 4:21 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 9:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 10:09 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 11:16 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 12:33 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 12:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-15 9:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-14 10:06 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 13:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 15:13 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 15:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 15:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 16:22 ` Al Viro [this message]
2023-04-14 16:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 19:01 ` Benjamin Coddington
2023-04-17 8:22 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 16:32 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 2:32 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 10:01 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 12:18 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 14:57 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 13:16 ` David Wysochanski
2023-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH/RFC] VFS: LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT should used cached info whenever possible NeilBrown
2023-04-17 11:55 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 12:25 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-17 14:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 15:21 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-17 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-18 8:10 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-18 3:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2023-04-18 8:04 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-20 13:05 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-20 15:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 21:26 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-20 21:35 ` Al Viro
2023-04-20 22:01 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-20 22:27 ` Al Viro
2023-04-17 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414162253.GL3390869@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox