From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: allowing for a completely cached umount(2) pathwalk
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:09:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3492fa76339672ccc48995ccf934744c63db4b80.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414-leihgabe-eisig-71fb7bb44d49@brauner>
On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 11:41 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 04:51:04AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 03:28:45AM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > > We already have support for directory file descriptors when mounting with move_mount(). Why not add a umountat() with similar support for the unmount side?
> > > Then add a syscall to allow users with (e.g.) the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE privilege to convert the mount-id into an O_PATH file descriptor.
> >
> > You can already do umount -l /proc/self/fd/69 if you have a descriptor.
>
> Way back when we put together stuff for [2] we had umountat() as an item
> but decided against it because it's mostely useful when used as AT_EMPTY_PATH.
>
> umount("/proc/self/fd/<nr>", ...) is useful when you don't trust the
> path and you need to resolve it with lookup restrictions. Then path
> resolution restrictions of openat2() can be used to get an fd. Which can
> be passed to umount().
>
> I need to step outside so this is a halfway-out-the-door thought but
> given your description of the problem Jeff, why doesn't the following
> work (Just sketching this, you can't call openat2() like that.):
>
> fd_mnt = openat2("/my/funky/nfs/share/mount", RESOLVE_CACHED)
> umount("/proc/self/fd/fd_mnt", MNT_DETACH)
Something like that might work. A RESOLVE_CACHED flag is something that
would involve more than just umount(2) though. That said, it could be
useful in other situations.
>
> > Converting mount-id to O_PATH... might be an interesting idea.
>
> I think using mount-ids would be nice and fwiw, something we considered
> as an alternative to umountat(). Not just can they be gotten from
> /proc/<pid>/mountinfo but we also do expose the mount id to userspace
> nowadays through:
>
> STATX_MNT_ID
> __u64 stx_mnt_id;
>
> which also came out of [2]. And it should be safe to do via
> AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC:
>
> statx(my_cached_fd, AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT|AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW|AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC)
>
> using STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT to identify a potential mountpoint. Then
> pass that mount-id to the new system call.
>
> [2]: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features
This is generating a lot of good ideas! Maybe we should plan to discuss
this further at LSF/MM?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 22:00 allowing for a completely cached umount(2) pathwalk Jeff Layton
2023-04-13 22:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2023-04-13 22:41 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-14 2:43 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 3:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 3:51 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 4:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 4:21 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 9:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 10:09 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-04-14 11:16 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 12:33 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 12:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-15 9:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-14 10:06 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 13:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 15:13 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 15:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 15:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 16:22 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 16:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2023-04-14 19:01 ` Benjamin Coddington
2023-04-17 8:22 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 16:32 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 2:32 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 10:01 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-14 12:18 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-14 14:57 ` Al Viro
2023-04-14 13:16 ` David Wysochanski
2023-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH/RFC] VFS: LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT should used cached info whenever possible NeilBrown
2023-04-17 11:55 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 12:25 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-17 14:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 15:21 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-17 21:34 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-18 8:10 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-18 3:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2023-04-18 8:04 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-20 13:05 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-20 15:41 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-17 21:26 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-20 21:35 ` Al Viro
2023-04-20 22:01 ` NeilBrown
2023-04-20 22:27 ` Al Viro
2023-04-17 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3492fa76339672ccc48995ccf934744c63db4b80.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox