Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:03:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516cf877-6d6f-4cc8-b4bf-fe8e616e8a47@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706050412.999B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>


On 7/6/2026 1:04 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Events without preceding valid records in a corrupted PEBS buffer are permanently stalled.
> --
>
> commit e2dd3df4b73a7bfac8a1332ea38906750253ef38
> Author: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>
> perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size
>
> This patch adds a sanity check for corrupted PEBS fragment sizes to prevent
> potential infinite loops. If a corrupted fragment is detected, the entire
> PEBS record and all subsequent records are dropped to ensure data integrity.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> index b38aed4f62b4c..7a8e619055393 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -3244,7 +3261,8 @@ static __always_inline void
>>  __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
>>  				    struct pt_regs *regs,
>>  				    struct perf_sample_data *data,
>> -				    u64 mask, short *counts, void **last,
>> +				    u64 mask, short *counts,
>> +				    void **last, bool corrupted,
>>  				    setup_fn setup_sample)
>>  {
>>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>> @@ -3258,7 +3276,7 @@ __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
>>  		event = cpuc->events[bit];
>>  
>>  		__intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, last[bit],
>> -					    counts[bit], setup_sample);
>> +					    counts[bit], corrupted, setup_sample);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  }
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does this logic permanently stall PMU
> profiling for events without preceding valid records in a corrupted buffer?
>
> In arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c:__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(), we skip
> processing if the count is zero:
>
> 	for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> 		if (!counts[bit])
> 			continue;
> 		...
>
> If a corrupted PEBS record is detected (e.g., via the newly added at >= top
> bounds checks) and the code exits the drain loop early, events that had no
> valid records parsed prior to the corruption will have a count of zero.
>
> Because these events are skipped here, __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event() is never
> called, preventing intel_pmu_save_and_restart() from re-arming their hardware
> counters. Furthermore, since handle_pmi_common() explicitly masks PEBS events
> out of the global status, the generic NMI handler will also ignore them.
>
> Could this lead to the hardware counters remaining disabled, stopping
> profiling until the session is recreated?

The issue won't really happen on real hardware. Fixing it would introduce
large complexity and seems unworthy ...


>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  1:54 [Patch v9 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 01/24] perf/x86: Fix two error-path and hybrid PMU guard issues Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:05     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 02/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:33     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:43     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 07/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:09     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 08/24] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:15     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 09/24] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Consolidate PMU capability updates Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  9:59     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-08  0:56       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:13     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 14/24] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  6:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:27     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 15/24] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 16/24] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 17/24] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 19/24] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 20/24] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:51     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  5:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  2:03     ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516cf877-6d6f-4cc8-b4bf-fe8e616e8a47@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox