[PATCH 0/9] s390: Exception based WARN() / WARN_ONCE()

[PATCH 0/9] s390: Exception based WARN() / WARN_ONCE()

[Heiko Carstens]

Use the generic infrastructure introduced by Peter Zijlstra [1] to implement
an exception based WARN() and WARN_ONCE() similar to x86.

Due to some compiler oddities on s390 this requires to raise the minimum gcc
version to 9. Maybe there are ways to avoid this, but I failed to find a
working solution. Details are in the patch descriptions.

Just posting this now to also get some compile bot testing, since I'm afraid
there might be some compiler version / config option around where even this
new approach breaks.

Peter, since you were wondering: your generic infrastructure pieces work very
nice. Looking at the x86 and s390 implementation: it might be possible to make
things even more generic since both __WARN_printf(), and WARN_ONCE() are
identical; it looks like only __WARN_print_arg() needs to be provided.

Arnd, just adding you so you know that there may be an architecture
which requires gcc-9 instead of gcc-8 in the near future.

Series is based on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features

...and not yet meant to be included anywhere.

Thanks,
Heiko

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251110114633.202485143@infradead.org/

Heiko Carstens (9):
  kbuild: Require gcc-9 for s390
  s390/bug: Convert to inline assembly with input operands
  s390/bug: Use BUG_FORMAT for DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_DETAILED
  s390/bug: Introduce and use monitor code macro
  s390/traps: Copy monitor code to pt_regs
  s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()
  s390/bug: Implement WARN_ONCE()
  s390/bug: Skip __WARN_trap() in call traces
  s390/bug: Prevent tail-call optimization

 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h    | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h |   5 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.S       |   7 ++
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c       |  42 +++++++++-
 scripts/min-tool-version.sh    |   2 +
 5 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

base-commit: 70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 1/9] kbuild: Require gcc-9 for s390

[Heiko Carstens]

Upcoming changes to s390 specific inline assemblies require the usage of
strings as immediate input operands. This works only with gcc-9 and newer
compilers. With gcc-8 this leads to a compile error:

void bar(void) { asm volatile("" :: "i" ("foo")); }

Results in:

In function 'bar':
 warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn't match constraints
  asm volatile("" :: "i" ("foo"));
  ^~~
 error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

Bump the minimal gcc version from gcc-8 to gcc-9 for s390 to solve this
problem.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 scripts/min-tool-version.sh | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/min-tool-version.sh b/scripts/min-tool-version.sh
index 99b5575c1ef7..1cacd389f29b 100755
--- a/scripts/min-tool-version.sh
+++ b/scripts/min-tool-version.sh
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ binutils)
 gcc)
 	if [ "$ARCH" = parisc64 ]; then
 		echo 12.0.0
+	elif [ "$ARCH" = s390 ]; then
+		echo 9.1.0
 	else
 		echo 8.1.0
 	fi
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 2/9] s390/bug: Convert to inline assembly with input operands

[Heiko Carstens]

Rewrite the bug inline assembly so it uses input operands again instead of
pure macro replacements. This more or less reverts the conversion done when
'cond_str' support was added [1].

Reason for this is that the upcoming __WARN_printf() implementation
requires an inline assembly with an output operand. At the same time input
strings (format specifier and condition string) may contain the special '%'
character. As soon as an inline assembly is specified to have input/output
operands the '%' has a special meaning: e.g. converting the existing

 #define __BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags) \
   asm_inline volatile(__stringify(ASM_BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)));

to

 #define __BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags) \
   asm_inline volatile(__stringify(ASM_BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags))::);

will result in a compile error as soon as 'cond_str' contains a '%'
character:

net/core/neighbour.c: In function ‘neigh_table_init’:
././include/linux/compiler_types.h:546:20: error: invalid 'asm': invalid %-code
...
net/core/neighbour.c:1838:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
 1838 |                 WARN_ON(tbl->entry_size % NEIGH_PRIV_ALIGN);
      |                 ^~~~~~~

Convert the code, use immediate operands, and also add comments similar to
x86 which are emitted to the generated assembly file, which makes debugging
much easier.

[1] 6584ff203aec ("bugs/s390: Use 'cond_str' in __EMIT_BUG()")

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 71 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index ee9221bb5d18..61496143a382 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -2,55 +2,44 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_S390_BUG_H
 #define _ASM_S390_BUG_H
 
-#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BUG
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
-#define _BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
+#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(file, line)					\
+	"	.long	" file " - .	# bug_entry::file\n"		\
+	"	.short	" line "	# bug_entry::line\n"
 #else
-#define __BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)			\
-		.pushsection .rodata.str, "aMS", @progbits, 1;	\
-		.align 2;					\
-	10002:	.ascii file "\0";				\
-		.popsection;					\
-								\
-		.long 10002b - .;				\
-		.short line;
-#define _BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line) __BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)
+#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(file, line)
 #endif
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
-#define __BUG_ENTRY(cond_str, flags)
-#else
-#define __BUG_ENTRY(cond_str, flags)				\
-		.pushsection __bug_table, "aw";			\
-		.align 4;					\
-	10000:	.long 10001f - .;				\
-		_BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) __FILE__, __LINE__) \
-		.short flags;					\
-		.popsection;					\
-	10001:
-#endif
-
-#define ASM_BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)				\
-	__BUG_ENTRY(cond_str, flags)				\
-	mc		0,0
-
-#define ASM_BUG()	ASM_BUG_FLAGS("", 0)
-
-#define __BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)				\
-	asm_inline volatile(__stringify(ASM_BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)));
-
-#define __WARN_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)				\
-do {								\
-	__BUG_FLAGS(cond_str, BUGFLAG_WARNING|(flags));		\
+#define __BUG_ASM(cond_str, flags)					\
+do {									\
+	asm_inline volatile("\n"					\
+		"0:	mc	0,0\n"					\
+		"	.section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"			\
+		"1:	.long	0b - .	# bug_entry::bug_addr\n"	\
+		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE("%[file]", "%[line]")		\
+		"	.short	%[flgs]	# bug_entry::flags\n"		\
+		"	.org	1b+%[size]\n"				\
+		"	.previous"					\
+		:							\
+		: [file] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) __FILE__),	\
+		  [line] "i" (__LINE__),				\
+		  [flgs] "i" (flags),					\
+		  [size] "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)));		\
 } while (0)
 
-#define BUG()							\
-do {								\
-	__BUG_FLAGS("", 0);					\
-	unreachable();						\
+#define BUG()								\
+do {									\
+	__BUG_ASM("", 0);						\
+	unreachable();							\
+} while (0)
+
+#define __WARN_FLAGS(cond_str, flags)					\
+do {									\
+	__BUG_ASM(cond_str, BUGFLAG_WARNING | (flags));			\
 } while (0)
 
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 3/9] s390/bug: Use BUG_FORMAT for DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_DETAILED

[Heiko Carstens]

This is just the s390 variant of commit 4f1b701f24be ("x86/bug: Use
BUG_FORMAT for DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_DETAILED").

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index 61496143a382..5a635158cbad 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -7,11 +7,18 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_BUG
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
-#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(file, line)					\
+#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(format, file, line)				\
+	"	.long	" format " - .	# bug_entry::format\n"		\
 	"	.long	" file " - .	# bug_entry::file\n"		\
 	"	.short	" line "	# bug_entry::line\n"
 #else
-#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(file, line)
+#define __BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(format, file, line)
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_DETAILED
+#define WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) cond_str
+#else
+#define WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) ""
 #endif
 
 #define __BUG_ASM(cond_str, flags)					\
@@ -20,12 +27,13 @@ do {									\
 		"0:	mc	0,0\n"					\
 		"	.section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"			\
 		"1:	.long	0b - .	# bug_entry::bug_addr\n"	\
-		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE("%[file]", "%[line]")		\
+		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE("%[frmt]", "%[file]", "%[line]")	\
 		"	.short	%[flgs]	# bug_entry::flags\n"		\
 		"	.org	1b+%[size]\n"				\
 		"	.previous"					\
 		:							\
-		: [file] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) __FILE__),	\
+		: [frmt] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str)),		\
+		  [file] "i" (__FILE__),				\
 		  [line] "i" (__LINE__),				\
 		  [flgs] "i" (flags),					\
 		  [size] "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)));		\
@@ -43,6 +51,7 @@ do {									\
 } while (0)
 
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
+#define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_BUG */
 
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 4/9] s390/bug: Introduce and use monitor code macro

[Heiko Carstens]

The first operand address of the monitor call (mc) instruction is the
monitor code. Currently the monitor code is ignored, but this will
change. Therefore add and use MONCODE_BUG instead of a hardcoded zero.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++--
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c    |  5 +++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index 5a635158cbad..1e1dece0eee4 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -3,7 +3,11 @@
 #define _ASM_S390_BUG_H
 
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/const.h>
 
+#define	MONCODE_BUG	_AC(0, U)
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
 #ifdef CONFIG_BUG
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
@@ -24,7 +28,7 @@
 #define __BUG_ASM(cond_str, flags)					\
 do {									\
 	asm_inline volatile("\n"					\
-		"0:	mc	0,0\n"					\
+		"0:	mc	%[monc](%%r0),0\n"			\
 		"	.section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"			\
 		"1:	.long	0b - .	# bug_entry::bug_addr\n"	\
 		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE("%[frmt]", "%[file]", "%[line]")	\
@@ -32,7 +36,8 @@ do {									\
 		"	.org	1b+%[size]\n"				\
 		"	.previous"					\
 		:							\
-		: [frmt] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str)),		\
+		: [monc] "i" (MONCODE_BUG),				\
+		  [frmt] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str)),		\
 		  [file] "i" (__FILE__),				\
 		  [line] "i" (__LINE__),				\
 		  [flgs] "i" (flags),					\
@@ -54,6 +59,7 @@ do {									\
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_BUG */
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
 
 #include <asm-generic/bug.h>
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
index 19687dab32f7..de63e98e724b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -258,11 +258,12 @@ static void __init test_monitor_call(void)
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG))
 		return;
 	asm_inline volatile(
-		"	mc	0,0\n"
+		"	mc	%[monc](%%r0),0\n"
 		"0:	lhi	%[val],0\n"
 		"1:\n"
 		EX_TABLE(0b, 1b)
-		: [val] "+d" (val));
+		: [val] "+d" (val)
+		: [monc] "i" (MONCODE_BUG));
 	if (!val)
 		panic("Monitor call doesn't work!\n");
 }
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 5/9] s390/traps: Copy monitor code to pt_regs

[Heiko Carstens]

In case of a monitor call program check the CPU stores the monitor code to
lowcore. Let the program check handler copy it to the pt_regs structure so
it can be used by the monitor call exception handler.

Instead of increasing the pt_regs size add a union which contains both
orig_gpr2 and monitor_code, since orig_gpr2 is not used in case of a
program check.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++++-
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c       | 1 +
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 962cf042c66d..f3c3a4ee263c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -120,7 +120,10 @@ struct pt_regs {
 			unsigned long gprs[NUM_GPRS];
 		};
 	};
-	unsigned long orig_gpr2;
+	union {
+		unsigned long orig_gpr2;
+		unsigned long monitor_code;
+	};
 	union {
 		struct {
 			unsigned int int_code;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
index de63e98e724b..b2d6d7cc3b17 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ void noinstr __do_pgm_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	teid.val = lc->trans_exc_code;
 	regs->int_code = lc->pgm_int_code;
 	regs->int_parm_long = teid.val;
+	regs->monitor_code = lc->monitor_code;
 	/*
 	 * In case of a guest fault, short-circuit the fault handler and return.
 	 * This way the sie64a() function will return 0; fault address and
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()

[Heiko Carstens]

This is the s390 variant of commit 5b472b6e5bd9 ("x86_64/bug: Implement
__WARN_printf()"). See the x86 commit for the general idea; there are only
implementation details which are different.

With the new exception based __WARN_printf() implementation the generated
code for a simple WARN() is simplified.

For example:

void foo(int a) { WARN(a, "bar"); }

Before this change the generated code looks like this:

0000000000000210 <foo>:
 210:   c0 04 00 00 00 00       jgnop   210 <foo>
 216:   ec 26 00 06 00 7c       cgijne  %r2,0,222 <foo+0x12>
 21c:   c0 f4 00 00 00 00       jg      21c <foo+0xc>
                        21e: R_390_PC32DBL      __s390_indirect_jump_r14+0x2
 222:   eb ef f0 88 00 24       stmg    %r14,%r15,136(%r15)
 228:   b9 04 00 ef             lgr     %r14,%r15
 22c:   e3 f0 ff e8 ff 71       lay     %r15,-24(%r15)
 232:   e3 e0 f0 98 00 24       stg     %r14,152(%r15)
 238:   c0 20 00 00 00 00       larl    %r2,238 <foo+0x28>
                        23a: R_390_PC32DBL      .LC48+0x2
 23e:   c0 e5 00 00 00 00       brasl   %r14,23e <foo+0x2e>
                        240: R_390_PLT32DBL     __warn_printk+0x2
 244:   af 00 00 00             mc      0,0
 248:   eb ef f0 a0 00 04       lmg     %r14,%r15,160(%r15)
 24e:   c0 f4 00 00 00 00       jg      24e <foo+0x3e>
                        250: R_390_PC32DBL      __s390_indirect_jump_r14+0x2

With this change the generated code looks like this:

0000000000000210 <foo>:
 210:   c0 04 00 00 00 00       jgnop   210 <foo>
 216:   ec 26 00 06 00 7c       cgijne  %r2,0,222 <foo+0x12>
 21c:   c0 f4 00 00 00 00       jg      21c <foo+0xc>
                        21e: R_390_PC32DBL      __s390_indirect_jump_r14+0x2
 222:   c0 20 00 00 00 00       larl    %r2,222 <foobar+0x12>
                        224: R_390_PC32DBL      __bug_table+0x2
 228:   c0 f4 00 00 00 00       jg      228 <foobar+0x18>
                        22a: R_390_PLT32DBL     __WARN_trap+0x2

Downside is that the call trace now starts at __WARN_trap():

------------[ cut here ]------------
bar
WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at 0x0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
...
Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003ffe0f6a3b4 (__WARN_trap+0x4/0x10)
...
Krnl Code: 000003ffe0f6a3ac: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f6a3ae: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
          *000003ffe0f6a3b0: af000001            mc      1,0
          >000003ffe0f6a3b4: 07fe                bcr     15,%r14
           000003ffe0f6a3b6: 47000700            bc      0,1792
           000003ffe0f6a3ba: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f6a3bc: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f6a3be: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
Call Trace:
 [<000003ffe0f6a3b4>] __WARN_trap+0x4/0x10
([<000003ffe185a54c>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x5d8)
 [<000003ffe010002e>] startup_continue+0x2e/0x40

Which isn't too helpful. This can be addressed by just skipping __WARN_trap(),
which will be addressed in a later patch.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.S    |  7 +++++
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c    | 34 +++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index 1e1dece0eee4..f3aca691bae2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/const.h>
 
 #define	MONCODE_BUG	_AC(0, U)
+#define	MONCODE_BUG_ARG _AC(1, U)
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
 #ifdef CONFIG_BUG
@@ -25,16 +26,20 @@
 #define WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) ""
 #endif
 
+#define __BUG_ENTRY(format, file, line, flags, size)			\
+		"	.section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"			\
+		"1:	.long	0b - .	# bug_entry::bug_addr\n"	\
+		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE(format, file, line)			\
+		"	.short	"flags"	# bug_entry::flags\n"		\
+		"	.org	1b+"size"\n"				\
+		"	.previous"
+
 #define __BUG_ASM(cond_str, flags)					\
 do {									\
 	asm_inline volatile("\n"					\
 		"0:	mc	%[monc](%%r0),0\n"			\
-		"	.section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"			\
-		"1:	.long	0b - .	# bug_entry::bug_addr\n"	\
-		__BUG_ENTRY_VERBOSE("%[frmt]", "%[file]", "%[line]")	\
-		"	.short	%[flgs]	# bug_entry::flags\n"		\
-		"	.org	1b+%[size]\n"				\
-		"	.previous"					\
+		__BUG_ENTRY("%[frmt]", "%[file]", "%[line]",		\
+			    "%[flgs]", "%[size]")			\
 		:							\
 		: [monc] "i" (MONCODE_BUG),				\
 		  [frmt] "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str)),		\
@@ -55,8 +60,53 @@ do {									\
 	__BUG_ASM(cond_str, BUGFLAG_WARNING | (flags));			\
 } while (0)
 
+#define __WARN_bug_entry(flags, format)					\
+({									\
+	struct bug_entry *bug;						\
+									\
+	asm_inline volatile("\n"					\
+		"0:	larl	%[bug],1f\n"				\
+		__BUG_ENTRY("%[frmt]", "%[file]", "%[line]",		\
+			    "%[flgs]", "%[size]")			\
+		: [bug] "=d" (bug)					\
+		: [frmt] "i" (format),					\
+		  [file] "i" (__FILE__),				\
+		  [line] "i" (__LINE__),				\
+		  [flgs] "i" (flags),					\
+		  [size] "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)));		\
+	bug;								\
+})
+
+/*
+ * Variable Argument List (va_list) as defined in ELF Application
+ * Binary Interface s390x Supplement documentation.
+ */
+struct arch_va_list {
+	long __gpr;
+	long __fpr;
+	void *__overflow_arg_area;
+	void *__reg_save_area;
+};
+
+struct bug_entry;
+struct pt_regs;
+
+void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs);
+void __WARN_trap(struct bug_entry *bug, ...);
+
+#define __WARN_print_arg(flags, format, arg...)				\
+do {									\
+	int __flags = (flags) | BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ARGS;		\
+									\
+	__WARN_trap(__WARN_bug_entry(__flags, format), ## arg);		\
+} while (0)
+
+#define __WARN_printf(taint, fmt, arg...) \
+	__WARN_print_arg(BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint), fmt, ## arg)
+
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT
+#define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT_ARGS
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_BUG */
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index b7f1553d9ee5..23ff05746aa6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/sigp.h>
+#include <asm/bug.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/fpu-insn.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
@@ -173,6 +174,12 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__switch_to_asm)
 	BR_EX	%r14
 SYM_FUNC_END(__switch_to_asm)
 
+SYM_FUNC_START(__WARN_trap)
+	mc	MONCODE_BUG_ARG(%r0),0
+	BR_EX	%r14
+SYM_FUNC_END(__WARN_trap)
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__WARN_trap)
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
 /*
  * __sie64a calling convention:
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
index b2d6d7cc3b17..8aca5858b403 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/entry-common.h>
 #include <linux/kmsan.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
 #include <asm/irqflags.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -220,11 +221,42 @@ static void space_switch_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	do_trap(regs, SIGILL, ILL_PRVOPC, "space switch event");
 }
 
+void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct stack_frame *stack_frame;
+
+	/*
+	 * Generate va_list from pt_regs. See ELF Application Binary Interface
+	 * s390x Supplement documentation for details.
+	 *
+	 * - __overflow_arg_area needs to point to the parameter area, which
+	 *   is right above the standard stack frame (160 bytes)
+	 *
+	 * - __reg_save_area needs to point to a register save area where
+	 *   general registers (%r2 - %r6) can be found at offset 16. Which
+	 *   means that the gprs save area of pt_regs can be used
+	 *
+	 * - __gpr must be set to one, since the first parameter has been
+	 *   processed (pointer to bug_entry)
+	 */
+	stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15];
+	args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
+	args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
+	args->__gpr = 1;
+	return args;
+}
+
 static void monitor_event_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	enum bug_trap_type btt;
+
 	if (user_mode(regs))
 		return;
-	switch (report_bug(regs->psw.addr - (regs->int_code >> 16), regs)) {
+	if (regs->monitor_code == MONCODE_BUG_ARG)
+		btt = report_bug_entry((struct bug_entry *)regs->gprs[2], regs);
+	else
+		btt = report_bug(regs->psw.addr - (regs->int_code >> 16), regs);
+	switch (btt) {
 	case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE:
 		fixup_exception(regs);
 		break;
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 7/9] s390/bug: Implement WARN_ONCE()

[Heiko Carstens]

This is the s390 variant of commit 11bb4944f014 ("x86/bug: Implement
WARN_ONCE()").

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index f3aca691bae2..e6e8b492c0e7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -104,6 +104,17 @@ do {									\
 #define __WARN_printf(taint, fmt, arg...) \
 	__WARN_print_arg(BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint), fmt, ## arg)
 
+#define WARN_ONCE(cond, format, arg...)					\
+({									\
+	int __ret_warn_on = !!(cond);					\
+									\
+	if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) {					\
+		__WARN_print_arg(BUGFLAG_ONCE|BUGFLAG_TAINT(TAINT_WARN),\
+				format, ## arg);			\
+	}								\
+	__ret_warn_on;							\
+})
+
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT
 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_FORMAT_ARGS
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 8/9] s390/bug: Skip __WARN_trap() in call traces

[Heiko Carstens]

In order to avoid rather pointless warning disassemblies of __WARN_trap()
set the PSW address to the return address of the function which called
__WARN_trap(). This is the address to which __WARN_trap() would return
in any case.

The result is a disassembly of the function which called __WARN_trap(),
which is much more helpful.

Before:

WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x2c/0x20, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
...
Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003ffe0f675f4 (__WARN_trap+0x4/0x10)
...
Krnl Code: 000003ffe0f675ec: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f675ee: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
          *000003ffe0f675f0: af000001            mc      1,0
          >000003ffe0f675f4: 07fe                bcr     15,%r14
           000003ffe0f675f6: 47000700            bc      0,1792
           000003ffe0f675fa: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f675fc: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0f675fe: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
Call Trace:
 [<000003ffe0f675f4>] __WARN_trap+0x4/0x10
 [<000003ffe185bc2e>] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x26/0x60
 [<000003ffe185654c>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x5d8
 [<000003ffe010002e>] startup_continue+0x2e/0x40

Afterwards:

WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x12/0x30, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
...
Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003ffe185bc2e (arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x26/0x60)
...
Krnl Code: 000003ffe185bc1c: e3f0ff98ff71        lay     %r15,-104(%r15)
           000003ffe185bc22: e3e0f0980024        stg     %r14,152(%r15)
          *000003ffe185bc28: c0e5ff45ed94        brasl   %r14,000003ffe0119750
          >000003ffe185bc2e: c0e5ffa052b9        brasl   %r14,000003ffe0c661a0
           000003ffe185bc34: c020fffe86d6        larl    %r2,000003ffe182c9e0
           000003ffe185bc3a: e548f0a80006        mvghi   168(%r15),6
           000003ffe185bc40: e548f0a00005        mvghi   160(%r15),5
           000003ffe185bc46: a7690004            lghi    %r6,4
Call Trace:
 [<000003ffe185bc2e>] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x26/0x60
 [<000003ffe185654c>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x5d8
 [<000003ffe010002e>] startup_continue+0x2e/0x40

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
index 8aca5858b403..5ed6ebe823bd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -252,10 +252,12 @@ static void monitor_event_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	if (user_mode(regs))
 		return;
-	if (regs->monitor_code == MONCODE_BUG_ARG)
+	if (regs->monitor_code == MONCODE_BUG_ARG) {
+		regs->psw.addr = regs->gprs[14];
 		btt = report_bug_entry((struct bug_entry *)regs->gprs[2], regs);
-	else
+	} else {
 		btt = report_bug(regs->psw.addr - (regs->int_code >> 16), regs);
+	}
 	switch (btt) {
 	case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE:
 		fixup_exception(regs);
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 9/9] s390/bug: Prevent tail-call optimization

[Heiko Carstens]

For the exception based __WARN_trap() implementation it is technically not
necessary to prevent tail-call optimization, however it may be confusing to
see warning messages like:

WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x2c/0x50, CPU#0: swapper/0/0

together with a disassembly of a different function caused by tail-call
optimaziation for the __WARN_trap() call. Prevent that by adding an empty
asm statement. This generates slightly worse code, but should hopefully
avoid confusion.

With this the output looks like:

WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x2c/0x50, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
...
Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003ffe0119788 (foobar+0x38/0x50)
...
Krnl Code: 000003ffe0119776: e3e0f0980024        stg     %r14,152(%r15)
           000003ffe011977c: c02000b8992a        larl    %r2,000003ffe182c9d0
          *000003ffe0119782: c0e5007270b7        brasl   %r14,000003ffe0f678f0
          >000003ffe0119788: ebeff0a00004        lmg     %r14,%r15,160(%r15)
           000003ffe011978e: 07fe                bcr     15,%r14
           000003ffe0119790: 47000700            bc      0,1792
           000003ffe0119794: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
           000003ffe0119796: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
Call Trace:
 [<000003ffe0119788>] foobar+0x38/0x50
 [<000003ffe185bc2e>] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x26/0x60
 [<000003ffe185654c>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x5d8
 [<000003ffe010002e>] startup_continue+0x2e/0x40

A better solution would be to replace or patch the branch instruction to
__WARN_trap() with the monitor call instruction, similar to what is done
for x86 [1]. However s390 does not support static_cond_calls(). Therefore
use the simple approach for the time being.

[1] commit 860238af7a33 ("x86_64/bug: Inline the UD1")

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
index e6e8b492c0e7..89187ec6f6b0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ do {									\
 	int __flags = (flags) | BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ARGS;		\
 									\
 	__WARN_trap(__WARN_bug_entry(__flags, format), ## arg);		\
+	/* prevent tail-call optimization */				\
+	asm("");							\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __WARN_printf(taint, fmt, arg...) \
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> +#define __WARN_print_arg(flags, format, arg...)				\
> +do {									\
> +	int __flags = (flags) | BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ARGS;		\
> +									\
> +	__WARN_trap(__WARN_bug_entry(__flags, format), ## arg);		\
> +} while (0)

So on x86 I had to add:

	asm("");

after the __WARN_trap() call above, to inhibit tail call optimization,
because:

> +void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct stack_frame *stack_frame;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Generate va_list from pt_regs. See ELF Application Binary Interface
> +	 * s390x Supplement documentation for details.
> +	 *
> +	 * - __overflow_arg_area needs to point to the parameter area, which
> +	 *   is right above the standard stack frame (160 bytes)
> +	 *
> +	 * - __reg_save_area needs to point to a register save area where
> +	 *   general registers (%r2 - %r6) can be found at offset 16. Which
> +	 *   means that the gprs save area of pt_regs can be used
> +	 *
> +	 * - __gpr must be set to one, since the first parameter has been
> +	 *   processed (pointer to bug_entry)
> +	 */
> +	stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15];
> +	args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
> +	args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
> +	args->__gpr = 1;
> +	return args;
> +}

that would affect the stack layout here. You don't suffer this because
you have a link register like setup?

Re: [PATCH 9/9] s390/bug: Prevent tail-call optimization

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> For the exception based __WARN_trap() implementation it is technically not
> necessary to prevent tail-call optimization, however it may be confusing to
> see warning messages like:
> 
> WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x2c/0x50, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
> 
> together with a disassembly of a different function caused by tail-call
> optimaziation for the __WARN_trap() call. Prevent that by adding an empty
> asm statement. This generates slightly worse code, but should hopefully
> avoid confusion.

Aah, because:

	bar()
	  foo()
	    __WARN_trap()


when foo() does a tail-call, your link reg points to bar() and not the
expected foo().

And at this point you don't have enough clues to conditionally do that
psw/r14 fixup either.

Oh well.

> With this the output looks like:
> 
> WARNING: arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:1017 at foobar+0x2c/0x50, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
> ...
> Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000003ffe0119788 (foobar+0x38/0x50)
> ...
> Krnl Code: 000003ffe0119776: e3e0f0980024        stg     %r14,152(%r15)
>            000003ffe011977c: c02000b8992a        larl    %r2,000003ffe182c9d0
>           *000003ffe0119782: c0e5007270b7        brasl   %r14,000003ffe0f678f0
>           >000003ffe0119788: ebeff0a00004        lmg     %r14,%r15,160(%r15)
>            000003ffe011978e: 07fe                bcr     15,%r14
>            000003ffe0119790: 47000700            bc      0,1792
>            000003ffe0119794: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
>            000003ffe0119796: 0707                bcr     0,%r7
> Call Trace:
>  [<000003ffe0119788>] foobar+0x38/0x50
>  [<000003ffe185bc2e>] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x26/0x60
>  [<000003ffe185654c>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x5d8
>  [<000003ffe010002e>] startup_continue+0x2e/0x40
> 
> A better solution would be to replace or patch the branch instruction to
> __WARN_trap() with the monitor call instruction, similar to what is done
> for x86 [1]. However s390 does not support static_cond_calls(). Therefore
> use the simple approach for the time being.

Right, and no objtool for you either :/ Because all you need is
something to find all the __WARN_trap() callsites and stick them in a
section.

> [1] commit 860238af7a33 ("x86_64/bug: Inline the UD1")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
> index e6e8b492c0e7..89187ec6f6b0 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ do {									\
>  	int __flags = (flags) | BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ARGS;		\
>  									\
>  	__WARN_trap(__WARN_bug_entry(__flags, format), ## arg);		\
> +	/* prevent tail-call optimization */				\
> +	asm("");							\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define __WARN_printf(taint, fmt, arg...) \
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/9] s390: Exception based WARN() / WARN_ONCE()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:16:52PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Use the generic infrastructure introduced by Peter Zijlstra [1] to implement
> an exception based WARN() and WARN_ONCE() similar to x86.
> 
> Due to some compiler oddities on s390 this requires to raise the minimum gcc
> version to 9. Maybe there are ways to avoid this, but I failed to find a
> working solution. Details are in the patch descriptions.
> 
> Just posting this now to also get some compile bot testing, since I'm afraid
> there might be some compiler version / config option around where even this
> new approach breaks.
> 
> Peter, since you were wondering: your generic infrastructure pieces work very
> nice. Looking at the x86 and s390 implementation: it might be possible to make
> things even more generic since both __WARN_printf(), and WARN_ONCE() are
> identical; it looks like only __WARN_print_arg() needs to be provided.

Nice! and yeah, perhaps we can unify that later.

Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()

[Heiko Carstens]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:35:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > +#define __WARN_print_arg(flags, format, arg...)				\
> > +do {									\
> > +	int __flags = (flags) | BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ARGS;		\
> > +									\
> > +	__WARN_trap(__WARN_bug_entry(__flags, format), ## arg);		\
> > +} while (0)
> 
> So on x86 I had to add:
> 
> 	asm("");
> 
> after the __WARN_trap() call above, to inhibit tail call optimization,
> because:
> 
> > +void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	struct stack_frame *stack_frame;
...
> > +	stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15];
> > +	args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
> > +	args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
> > +	args->__gpr = 1;
> > +	return args;
> > +}
> 
> that would affect the stack layout here. You don't suffer this because
> you have a link register like setup?

Yes, in case of tail call optimization everything which needs to be known to
setup va_list is passed in registers. __overflow_arg_area will then point to
garbage, but it doesn't matter since it is unused for such cases.

Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()

[kernel test robot]

Hi Heiko,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Heiko-Carstens/kbuild-Require-gcc-9-for-s390/20251209-202647
base:   70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209121701.1856271-7-hca%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()
config: s390-randconfig-r062-20251210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102049.3FCpsgLh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102049.3FCpsgLh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512102049.3FCpsgLh-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:26: warning: 'struct arch_va_list' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
     224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:7: warning: no previous prototype for '__warn_args' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
         |       ^~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c: In function '__warn_args':
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:243:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     243 |         args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
         |             ^~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:244:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     244 |         args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
         |             ^~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:245:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     245 |         args->__gpr = 1;
         |             ^~


vim +224 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c

   223	
 > 224	void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
   225	{
   226		struct stack_frame *stack_frame;
   227	
   228		/*
   229		 * Generate va_list from pt_regs. See ELF Application Binary Interface
   230		 * s390x Supplement documentation for details.
   231		 *
   232		 * - __overflow_arg_area needs to point to the parameter area, which
   233		 *   is right above the standard stack frame (160 bytes)
   234		 *
   235		 * - __reg_save_area needs to point to a register save area where
   236		 *   general registers (%r2 - %r6) can be found at offset 16. Which
   237		 *   means that the gprs save area of pt_regs can be used
   238		 *
   239		 * - __gpr must be set to one, since the first parameter has been
   240		 *   processed (pointer to bug_entry)
   241		 */
   242		stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15];
   243		args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
   244		args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
   245		args->__gpr = 1;
   246		return args;
   247	}
   248	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Re: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()

[kernel test robot]

Hi Heiko,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Heiko-Carstens/kbuild-Require-gcc-9-for-s390/20251209-202647
base:   70075e3d0ca0b72cc983d03f7cd9796e43492980
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251209121701.1856271-7-hca%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 6/9] s390/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()
config: s390-randconfig-r062-20251210 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251210/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512102243.DTSqDkfQ-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:26: warning: 'struct arch_va_list' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
     224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:224:7: warning: no previous prototype for '__warn_args' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     224 | void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
         |       ^~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c: In function '__warn_args':
>> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:243:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     243 |         args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
         |             ^~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:244:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     244 |         args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
         |             ^~
   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:245:13: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arch_va_list'
     245 |         args->__gpr = 1;
         |             ^~


vim +243 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c

   223	
 > 224	void *__warn_args(struct arch_va_list *args, struct pt_regs *regs)
   225	{
   226		struct stack_frame *stack_frame;
   227	
   228		/*
   229		 * Generate va_list from pt_regs. See ELF Application Binary Interface
   230		 * s390x Supplement documentation for details.
   231		 *
   232		 * - __overflow_arg_area needs to point to the parameter area, which
   233		 *   is right above the standard stack frame (160 bytes)
   234		 *
   235		 * - __reg_save_area needs to point to a register save area where
   236		 *   general registers (%r2 - %r6) can be found at offset 16. Which
   237		 *   means that the gprs save area of pt_regs can be used
   238		 *
   239		 * - __gpr must be set to one, since the first parameter has been
   240		 *   processed (pointer to bug_entry)
   241		 */
   242		stack_frame = (struct stack_frame *)regs->gprs[15];
 > 243		args->__overflow_arg_area = stack_frame + 1;
   244		args->__reg_save_area = regs->gprs;
   245		args->__gpr = 1;
   246		return args;
   247	}
   248	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki