Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:54:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917125445.1376493-13-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917125445.1376493-8-cassel@kernel.org>

When logical block provisioning is enabled, a command that writes user
data marks the region that it wrote in the provisioning map, so that
GET LBA STATUS reports the region as mapped. resp_write_dt0(),
resp_write_scat() and resp_write_same() all call map_region() for that.

resp_atomic_write() does not, so a WRITE ATOMIC (16) leaves the
provisioning map untouched, and GET LBA STATUS keeps reporting the
region as deallocated after it has been written. map_state(), which
GET LBA STATUS uses, is the only reader of the map, so that is the whole
of the effect.

Call map_region() the way resp_write_dt0() does, and take the zone
metadata write lock across the access as it does when logical block
provisioning is enabled. That lock is what serialises the provisioning
map against resp_unmap(), which holds it while unmap_region() clears map
bits and zeroes the data that they cover. resp_unmap() does nothing
unless logical block provisioning is enabled, so the lock is only needed
in that case.

Assisted-by: LLM
Fixes: 84f3a3c01d70 ("scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index 64f32d97455d..33f2df26e5af 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -6184,6 +6184,7 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
 	u8 *cmd = scp->cmnd;
 	u16 boundary, len;
 	u64 lba, lba_tmp;
+	bool meta_data_locked = false;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!scsi_debug_atomic_write()) {
@@ -6228,7 +6229,18 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (scsi_debug_lbp()) {
+		sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
+		meta_data_locked = true;
+	}
+
 	ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);
+	if (unlikely(scsi_debug_lbp()))
+		map_region(sip, lba, len);
+
+	if (meta_data_locked)
+		sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
+
 	if (unlikely(ret == -1))
 		return DID_ERROR << 16;
 	if (unlikely(ret != len * sdebug_sector_size))
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-17 13:12   ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260917125445.1376493-13-cassel@kernel.org \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox